The influence of general anesthesia (GA) on transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) was studied in 19 normally hearing women undergoing surgery. Emissions were measured on the day before the operation, after premedication but before the beginning of the operation, and during and after the operation. There were no significant differences in TEOAE amplitude or in reproducibility between results obtained the day before the operation and after premedication. Ten patients received nitrous oxide (N2O) during GA (N2O group), and 9 patients did not (non-N2O group). The amplitude of TEOAEs was reduced during GA in 9 of 10 patients in the N2O group and in 7 of 9 patients in the non-N2O group. However, the average decrease of amplitude after the first 10 minutes was greater in the N2O group (4 ± 3.4 dB) than in the non-N2O group (0.18 ± 1.4 dB). The corresponding mean reproducibility of the response decreased in 9 of 10 patients of the N2O group (29% ± 24%) and was nearly unchanged in the non-N2O group (2.3% ± 7.2%). The time course of the amplitude reduction was similar in both groups. The smallest amplitudes were reached on an average by 19.3 ± 11.4 minutes in the N2O group and by 17 ± 13.6 minutes in the non-N2O group. Preoperative and postoperative TEOAEs were comparable in level and reproducibility. Differential frequency effects imply a middle ear effect for the greater reduction of TEO AE amplitudes in the N2O group due to gas diffusion into the middle ear. The decreases in the amplitudes of TEOAEs in patients not receiving N2O indicate the presence of additional factors affecting the response during GA.
ProbstR., CoatsA.C., MartinG.K., Lonsbury-MartinB.L.Spontaneous, click-, and toneburst-evoked otoacoustic emissions from normal ears.Hear Res1986; 21: 261–75.
4.
StevensJ.C., WebbH.D., SmithM.F., BuffinJ.T., RuddyH.A comparison of oto-acoustic emissions and brain stem electric response audiometry in the normal newborn and babies admitted to a special care baby unitClin Phys Physiol Meas1987; 8: 95–104.
5.
StevensJ.C.Click-evoked oto-acoustic emissions in normal and hearing-impaired adults.Br J Audiol1988; 22: 42–9.
6.
BonfilsP., UzielA., PujolR.Evoked oto-acoustic emissions from adults and infants: clinical applications.Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh)1988; 105: 445–9.
7.
KempD.T., RyanS., BrayP.A guide to the effective use of otoacoustic emissions.Ear Hear1990; 11: 93–104.
8.
ColletL., VeuilletE., DuclauxR., MorgonA.Influence of contralateral auditory stimulation on evoked otoacoustic emissions. In: GrandoriF., CianfroneG., KempD.T., eds. Cochlear mechanisms and otoacoustic emissions.Basel, Switzerland: Kargerv, 1990: 164–70. (Advances in audiology; vol 7.)
9.
ColletL., KempD.T., VeuilletE., DuclauxR., MoulinA., MorgonA.Effect of contralateral auditory stimuli on active cochlear micro-mechanical properties in human subjects.Hear Res1990b; 43: 251–62.
10.
VeuilletE., ColletL., DuclauxR.Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects: dependence on stimulus variables.J Neurophysiol1991; 65: 724–35.
GalleyN., KlinkeR., OertelW., PauseM., StorchW.H.The effect of intracochlearly administered acetylcholine-blocking agents on the efferent synapses of the cochlea.Brain Res1973; 64: 55–63.
13.
KlinkeR., OertelW.Evidence that GABA is not the afferent transmitter in the cochlea.Exp Brain Res1977; 28: 311–31.
14.
FexJ., AltschulerR.A.Enkephalin-like immunoreactivity of olivocochlear nerve fibers in cochlea of guinea pig and rat.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA1981; 78: 1255–9.
15.
AltschulerR.A., FexJ.Efferent neurotransmitters. In: AltschulerR.A., BobbinR.P., HoffmanD.W., eds. Neurobiology of hearing: the cochlea.New York, NY: Raven Press, 1986: 383–97.
16.
HoffmanD.W.Opioid mechanisms in the inner ear. In: AltschulerR.A., BobbinR.P., HoffmanD.W., eds. Neurobiology of hearing: the cochlea.New York, NY: Raven Press, 1986: 371–82.
17.
KlinkeR.Neurotransmission in the inner ear.Hear Res1986; 22: 235–43.
18.
EybalinM., ParnaudC., GeffardM., PujolR.Immuno-electron microscopy identifies several types of GABA-containing efferent synapses in the guinea pig organ of Corti.Neuroscience1988; 24: 29–38.
19.
MöhlerH., OkadaT.Benzodiazepine receptor: demonstration in the central nervous system.Science1977; 198: 849–51.
20.
SchochP., RichardsJ.G., HäringP.Co-localization of GABAA receptors and benzodiazepine receptors in the brain shown by monoclonal antibodies.Nature1985; 314: 168–71.
YatesG.K., BishopP.Cochlear echos in guinea pigs. Annual report 3. Nottingham, England: Institute of Hearing Research, 1979: 14.
23.
WitH.P., RitsmaR.J.Stimulated acoustic emissions from the human ear.J Acoust Soc Am1979; 66: 911–3.
24.
WitH.P., KahmannH.F.Frequency analysis of stimulated cochlear acoustic emissions in monkey ears.Hear Res1982; 8: 1–11.
25.
WilsonJ.P., EvansE.F.Effects of furosemide, flaxedil, noise and tone over-stimulation on the evoked otoacoustic emission in cats.Proc Int Union Physiol1983: 100.
26.
SchmiedtR.A., AdamsJ.C.Stimulated acoustic emissions in the ear canal of the gerbil.Hear Res1981; 5: 295–305.
27.
ZwickerE., ManleyG.Acoustical responses and suppression-period patterns in guinea pigs.Hear Res1981; 4: 43–52.
28.
PalmerA.R., WilsonJ.P.Spontaneous and evoked acoustic emissions in the frog Rana esculenta.J Physiol (Lond)1982; 324: 66.
29.
ManleyG.A., SchulzeM., OeckinghausH.Otoacoustic emissions in a song bird.Hear Res1987; 26: 257–66.
ProbstR., BeckD.Influence of general anesthesia on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. Abstracts of the 10th Midwinter Research Meeting, St Petersburg, Fla: Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 1987: 17.
33.
SchlothE.Akustische Aussendungen des menschlichen Ohres (oto-akustische Emissionen) [Dissertation].Munich, Federal Republic of Germany: Technical University, 1982.
34.
DallmayrC.Spontane oto-akustische Emissionen: Statistik und Reaktion auf akustische Störtöne.Acustica1985; 59: 67–75.
35.
FrickL.R., MatthiesM.L.Effects of external stimuli on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.Ear Hear1988; 9: 190–7.
HauserR., ProbstR., HarrisF.P.Effects of variation in atmospheric pressure on the amplitude of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans. Abstracts of the 14th Midwinter Research Meeting, St Petersburg, Fla: Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 1991: 66.
43.
QuarantaA., SalonnaI.Evoked otoacoustic emissions and cochlear psychoacoustic tests: effects of atropine. In: GrandoriF., CianfroneG., KempD.T., eds. Cochlear mechanisms and otoacoustic emissions.Basel, Switzerland: Karger, 1990: 171–9. (Advances in audiology; vol 7.)
