Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Intracochlear potential distributions were measured from subjects implanted with the Ineraid multichannel cochlear implant. The electrode array provided direct accessibility for obtaining measurements. Different modes of stimulation were used. The findings with intracochlear monopolar stimulation seem to confirm that significant low-resistance pathways, in which currents can flow into or out of the cochlea, are located in the basal turn. The results with extracochlear stimulation only show small intracochlear potential gradients. This finding suggests that no substantial currents flow along the auditory nerve fibers when extracochlear stimulation is used. These results concur with the electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses, in that intracochlear stimulation consistently elicited auditory brain stem responses, whereas responses elicited at or near the round window by extracochlear stimulation were weak or absent.

Keywords

cochlear implant electrical stimulation evoked auditory brain stem response intracochlear current flow

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Walsh

Leake-Jones

. Chronic electrical stimulation of auditory nerve in cat: physiological and histological results. Hear Res 1982; 7: 281–304.

Smith

Simmons

. Estimating eighth nerve survival by electrical stimulation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1983; 92: 19–23.

Shepherd

Clark

Black

. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in cats. Physiological and histopathological results. Acta Otolaryngol [Suppl] (Stockh) 1983 (suppl 399): 19–31.

Miller

Duckert

Malone

Pfingst

. Cochlear prostheses: stimulation-induced damage. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1983; 92: 599–609.

Steel

Bock

. Electrically-evoked responses in animals with progressive spiral ganglion degeneration. Hear Res 1984; 15: 59–67.

Hall

. Estimation of surviving spiral ganglion cells in the deaf rat using the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response. Hear Res 1990; 45: 123–36.

Simmons

Lusted

Meyers

Shelton

. Electrically induced auditory brainstem response as a clinical tool in estimating nerve survival. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1984; 93 (suppl 112): 97–100.

Pelizzone

Kasper

Montandon

. Electrically evoked responses in cochlear implant patients. Audiology 1989; 28: 230–8.

Kasper

Pelizzone

Montandon

. Brain activity evoked by a multichannel cochlear implant. In: Banfai

, ed. Cochlear implant: current situation. Erkelenz, Federal Republic of Germany: Rudolf Bermann, 1987: 463–5.

10.

Jewett

Williston

. Auditory-evoked far fields averaged from the scalp of humans. Brain 1971; 94: 681–96.

11.

Starr

Brackmann

. Brain stem potentials evoked by electrical stimulation of the cochlea in human subjects. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1979; 88: 550–6.

12.

Gardi

. Human brain stem and middle latency responses to electrical stimulation: preliminary observations. In: Schindler

Merzenich

, eds. Cochlear implants. New York, NY: Raven Press, 1985: 351–63.

13.

Van den Honert

Stypulkowski

. Characterization of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (ABR) in cats and humans. Hear Res 1986; 21: 109–26.

14.

Abbas

Brown

. Electrically evoked brainstem potentials in cochlear implant patients with multi-electrode stimulation. Hear Res 1989; 36: 153–62.

15.

Girzon

. Investigation of current flow in the inner ear during electrical stimulation of intracochlear electrodes [Thesis]. Cambridge, Mass: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1987.

16.

Kiang

NYS

Moxon

Kahn

. The relationship of gross potentials recorded from the cochlea to single unit activity in the auditory nerve. In: Ruben

Elberling

Salomon

, eds. Electrocochleography. Baltimore, Md: University Park Press, 1976: 95–115.

17.

Goldstein

Kiang

NYS

. Synchrony of neural activity on electric response evoked by transient acoustic stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am 1958; 30: 107–14.

18.

Wang

. The relation between the compound action potential and unit discharges of the auditory nerve [Thesis]. Cambridge, Mass: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1979.

19.

Sohmer

Feinmesser

. Cochlear action potentials recorded from the external ear in man. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1967; 76: 427–35.

20.

Buchwald

Huang

C-M

. Far field acoustic response: origins in the cat. Science 1975; 189: 382–4.

21.

Brummer

Turner

. Electrical stimulation with Pt electrodes: II — estimation of maximum surface redox (theoretical non-gassing) limits. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1977; 24: 440–3.

Intracochlear Potential Distribution with Intracochlear and Extracochlear Electrical Stimulation in Humans

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References