LaurianNZoharYTuraniH. Histologic findings in a larynx reconstructed by a nasoseptal autograft after partial laryngectomy. Laryngoscope1983; 93: 1481–2.
2.
LaurianNZoharY. Laryngeal reconstruction by composite nasal mucoseptal graft after partial laryngectomy. Three years follow-up. Laryngoscope1981; 91: 609–15.
3.
ToohillRJMartinelliDLJanowakMC. Repair of laryngeal stenosis with nasal septal grafts. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol1976; 85: 600–8.
4.
DuncavageJToohillRIsertD. Composite nasal septal graft reconstruction of the partial laryngectomized canine. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol1978; 86: 285–90.
5.
LaurianNZoharYTuraniH. Histologic findings in a larynx reconstructed by a nasoseptal autograft after partial laryngectomy. Laryngoscope1983; 93: 1481–2.
6.
LaurianNZoharY. Laryngeal reconstruction by composite nasal mucoseptal graft after partial laryngectomy. Three years follow-up. Laryngoscope1981; 91: 609–15.
7.
ToohillRJMartinelliDLJanowakMC. Repair of laryngeal stenosis with nasal septal grafts. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol1976; 85: 600–8.
8.
DuncavageJToohillRIsertD. Composite nasal septal graft reconstruction of the partial laryngectomized canine. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol1978; 86: 285–90.
RussellGO. Speech and voice. New York, NY: Macmillan, 1931: 239–40.
11.
BooneDMcFarlaneS. The voice and voice therapy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1988.
12.
BzochK. Measurement and assessment of categorical aspects of cleft palate language, voice, and speech disorders. In: BzochK, ed. Communicative disorders related to cleft lip and palate. Boston, Mass: College-Hill Press, 1989: 137–73.
13.
NetsellR. Velopharyngeal dysfunction. In: YoderDKentR, eds. Decision making in speech-language pathology. Philadelphia, Pa: BC Decker, 1988: 150–1.
14.
NicolosiLHarrymanEKresheckJ. Terminology of communication disorders. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins, 1983.
15.
Peterson-FalzoneS. Speech disorders related to craniofacial structural defects: Part 1. In: LassNMcReynoldsLNorthernJYoderD, eds. Handbook of speech-language pathology and audiology. Philadelphia, Pa: BC Decker, 1988: 442–76.
16.
EmerickIHattenJ. Diagnosis and evaluation in speech pathology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1974.
17.
LandisPFlemingJ. The interrelationship of speech therapy and prostheses for the handicapped child. Dent Clin North Am1974; 18: 723–4.
18.
MollK. Speech characteristics of individuals with cleft lip and palate. In: SpriestersbachDShermanD, eds. Cleft palate and communication. New York, NY: Academic Press, 1968: 61–118.
19.
SpriestersbachDMollKMorrisH. Heterogeneity of the cleft palate population and research designs. Cleft Palate J1964; 1: 210–6.
20.
GarciaMII. Observations of the human voice. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. London, England; 1855: 399–410.
21.
HelmholtzHLF. On the sensations of tone (Trans. MorgenauHenry). 2nd ed.New York, NY: Dover Publications, 1954.
RussellGO. Speech and voice. New York, NY: Macmillan, 1931: 239–40.
24.
BartholonewWT. A physical definition of “good voice quality” in the male voice. J Acoust Soc Am1934; 6: 25–33.
25.
LichteWH. Attributes of complex tones. J Exp Psychol1941; 28: 455–80.
26.
Van den BergJ. Vennard W. Toward an objective vocabulary for voice pedagogy. NATS Bull1959;Feb: 10–15.
27.
SundbergJ. Articulatoy interpretation of the “singing formant”. J Acoust Soc Am1974; 55: 838–44.
28.
ColtonRHEstillJA. Elements of voice quality: Perceptual, acoustic, and physiologic aspects. In: LassNJ, ed. Speech and language: Advances in basic research and practice. New York. NY: Academic Press. 1981: 311–403.
29.
LaverJ. The phonetic description of voice quality. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1980: 68, 86, 150.
30.
TitzeI. Nasality in vowels. NATS J1987; 43: 34, 35, 37.
31.
YanagisawaEKmuchaSTEstillJ. Role of the soft palate in laryngeal functions and selected voice qualities. Simultaneous velolaryngeal videoendoscopy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol1990; 99: 18–28.
32.
YanagisawaEEstillJKmuchaSTLederSB. The contribution of aryepiglottic constriction to “ringing” voice quality — A videolaryngoscopic study with acoustic analysis. J Voice1989; 3: 342–50.