A protocol was established at our institution to compare a series of primary and secondary tracheoesophageal punctures using the Singer-Blom voice prosthesis. Over a 24-month period, 20 primary and 18 secondary punctures were performed. Voice production, fluency of voice, and functional use were graded. Our data support the use of both primary and secondary voice restoration following laryngectomy.
SingerMIBlomED. An endoscopic technique for restoration of voice after laryngectomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol1980; 89: 529–33
2.
Pardy-MitzellSAndrewsMLBowmanSA. Acceptability and intelligibility of tracheoesophageal speech. Arch Otolaryngol1985; 111: 213–5
3.
WetmoreSJKruegerKWessonKBlessingML. Long-term results of the Blom-Singer speech rehabilitation procedure. Arch Otolaryngol1985; 111: 106–9
4.
WilliamsSEWatsonJB. Speaking proficiency variations according to method of alaryngeal voicing. Laryngoscope1987; 97: 737–9
5.
WilliamsSEWatsonJB. Differences in speaking proficiencies in three laryngectomy groups. Arch Otolaryngol1985; 111: 216–9
6.
BlomEDSingerMIHamakerRC. A prospective study of tracheoesophageal speech. Arch Otolaryngol1986; 112: 440–7
7.
LopezMJKraybillWMcElroyTHGuerraO. Voice rehabilitation practices among head and neck surgeons. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol1987; 96: 261–3
8.
HamakerRCSingerMIBlomEDDanielsHA. Primary voice restoration and laryngectomy. Arch Otolaryngol1985; 111: 182–6
9.
StiernbergCMBaileyBJCalhounKHPerezDG. Primary tracheoesophageal fistula procedure for voice restoration: The University of Texas Medical Branch experience. Laryngoscope1987; 97: 820–4
