The endolymphatic volume of the utricle and the saccule and the surface area of the saccular macula were measured in eight mammalian species, including humans. The results confirmed that all measurements increased slowly but consistently correlating with increases in body weight. However, differences in these endolymphatic volumes or macular surface areas might also be influenced by functional characteristics among different species rather than simply reflecting geometrical comparability.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ThompsonDW. On growth and form: A new edition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1943.
2.
TrembleGE. Size of bony labyrinth of human infant and adult compared to that in certain animals. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol1978; 87: 351–5.
3.
HadziselimovicHSavkovicLJAndelicM. On the labyrinth in certain mammals and in man. Folia Med Facult Med Univ Sarav1975; 10: 121–31.
4.
IgarashiMYoshinobuT. Comparative cochlear reconstruction in mammals. NSAM-931. Pensacola, Fla: US Naval School of Aviation Medicine, 1965.
5.
JonesGMSpellsKE. A theoretical and comparative study of the functional dependence of the semicircular canal upon its physical dimensions. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol]1963; 157: 403–19.
6.
GüntherB. Dimensional analysis and theory of biological similarity. Physiol Rev1975; 55: 659–99.
7.
AdolphEF. Quantitative relations in the physiological constitutions of mammals. Science1949; 109: 579–85.
8.
GouldSJ. Allometry and size in ontogeny and phylogeny. Biol Rev1966; 41: 587–640.
9.
StahlWRGummersonJY. Systematic allometry in five species of adult primates. Growth1967; 31: 21–34.
10.
IgarashiMO-UchiTAlfordBR. Volumetric and dimensional measurements of vestibular structures in the squirrel monkey. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh)1981; 91: 437–44.
11.
IgarashiMO-UchiTIsagoHWrightWK. Utricular and saccular volumetry in human temporal bones. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh)1983; 95: 75–80.
12.
AltmanPLDittmerDS. Biology data book. Washington, DC: Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 1964: 94–100.
13.
FrankDW. Physiological data of laboratory animals. In: MelbyECAltmanAH, eds. CRC handbook of laboratory animal science. Vol 3. Cleveland: CRC Press, 1976: 23–64.
14.
FernandezCValentinuzziM. A study on the biophysical characteristics of the cat labyrinth. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh)1968; 65: 293–310.
15.
IgarashiM. Dimensional study of the vestibular apparatus. Laryngoscope1967; 77: 1806–17.
16.
WattHJ. Dimensions of the labyrinth correlated. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol]1924; 96: 334–8.
17.
WestonJK. Notes on the comparative anatomy of the sensory areas of the vertebrate inner ear. J Comp Neurol1939; 70: 355–94.
18.
Melvill JonesG. The functional significance of semicircular canal size. In: KornhuberH, ed. Vestibular system. I. Basic mechanisms. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1984: 171–84. (KornhuberH, ed. Handbook of sensory physiology; vol 6.).
19.
HowlandHCMasciJ. The functional allometry of semicircular canals, fins, and body dimensions in the juvenile centrarchid fish, Lepomis gibbosus (L). J Embryol Exp Morphol1973; 29: 721–43.
20.
ClarkDL. Correlative postnatal vestibular development. RF project 2988. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University Research Foundation, 1973.
21.
JerisonHJ. Brain to body ratios and the evolution of intelligence. Science1955; 121: 447–9.
