Aural Rehabilitation in a Teaching Hospital: Evaluation and Results

Abstract

More than 1,000 hearing-impaired adults who underwent hearing aid evaluations in a teaching hospital were followed for a minimum of 1 year. Questionnaires, which included over 300 clinical items, were developed for computer entry by audiological staff. This data was analyzed to obtain demographic information about the population and the effectiveness of the intervention. The program was evaluated in terms of criteria ranging from simple compliance with the recommendation to purchase an aid, attendance at scheduled follow-up appointments, adequacy of the amplification system, patient competence in handling the aid, frequency and duration of aid use, and benefit in specific listening situations. It can be concluded that simple compliance figures overestimate program success. Even 1 year after purchase many patients still had practical difficulties with the aid, and use and benefit patterns were still developing. Directions for program change have been determined as measurement of success has been more critically defined and goals for rehabilitation have broadened.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Garstecki

. Aural rehabilitation for the aging adult. In: Beasley

Davis

, eds. Aging communication processes and disorders. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1980.

Garstecki

. Rehabilitation of hearing-handicapped elderly adults. Ear Hear 1982; 3: 167–72.

Goldstein

Stephens

SDG

. Audiological rehabilitation: Management model I. Audiology 1981; 20: 432–52.

Rupp

Heavenrich

. Positive communicative game rules. I. Auditory reach. Hear Instr 1982; 32: 34, 64.

Rupp

Heavenrich

. Positive communicative game rules. II. The cooperative other communicator. Hear Instr 1982; 33: 18, 19. 56.

Rupp

Heavenrich

. Positive communicative game rules. III. Self defeating behaviors. Hear Instr 1982; 33: 20, 22.

Berger

Abel

Hagberg

. Successes and problems of hearing aid users. Hear Aid J 1982; 35:(Dec) 26–30.

Peck

. Uses and abuses of hearing aids. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1980; 89 (suppl 74) :70–3.

Hyde

Pattison

Sherman

. Survey of the perceived needs of hearing-impaired adults in Queensland. Aust J Audiol 1981; 3: 5–10.

10.

Ward

. Effectiveness of aftercare for older people prescribed a hearing aid for the first time. Scand Audiol 1981; 10: 99–106.

11.

Hartford

. Hearing aid amplification for adults. Monogr Contemp Audiol 1979; 1(4).

12.

Stephens

SDG

. Hearing aid use by adults: A survey of surveys. Clin Otolaryngol 1977; 2: 385–402.

13.

Surr

Schuchman

Montgomery

. Factors influencing use of hearing aids. Hear Instr 1979; 30: 19–21, 48.

14.

Owens

Gerber

Uken

. Two years of a program in hearing-aid-related services. Arch Otolaryngol 1978; 104: 495–500.

15.

Stroup

. A hearing aid program. 1. Patient ratings and clinical practicalities. Audiol Hear Educ 1977; June-July: 19, 20, 22, 24.

16.

Stroup

. A hearing aid program. 2. Patient ratings and clinical practicalities. Audiol Hear Educ 1977; Aug-Sept:6, 21.

17.

Alberti

. Hearing aids and aural rehabilitation in a geriatric population. J Otolaryngol 1977; 6(suppl 4).

18.

Pichora-Fuller

Hyde

Alberti

. A hearing aid and aural rehabilitation follow-up program. Human Commun Canada 1983; 7: 446–8.

19.

Alberti

Hyde

. A computer data bank system for otolaryngologic and audiologic data. Arch Otolaryngol 1983; 109: 245–51.

20.

Alberti

Brown

. The effectiveness of a hearing aid delivery system. J Otolaryngol 1980; 9: 266–70.

21.

Jerger

Hayes

. Hearing aid evaluation: Clinical experience with a new philosophy. Arch Otolaryngol 1976; 102: 214–24.

22.

Otto

Rose

Jones

. Evaluation of a hearing aid consultation and referral program. Audiol Hear Educ 1977; 3: 14–6.

23.

Ross

. Hearing aid evaluation. In: Katz

, ed. Handbook of clinical audiology. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1977.

24.

Kapteyn

. Satisfaction with fitted hearing aids. II. An investigation into the influence of psycho-social factors. Scand Audiol 1977; 6: 147–56.

25.

Schow

Tannahill

. Hearing handicap scores and categories for subjects with normal and impaired hearing sensitivity. J Am Audiol Soc 1977; 3: 134–9.

26.

Weinstein

Ventry

. Audiometric correlates of the hearing handicap inventory for the elderly. J Speech Hear Disord 1983; 48: 379–84.

27.

Giolas

Owens

Lamb

Schubert

. Hearing performance inventory. J Speech Hear Disord 1979; 44: 169–95.

28.

Giolas

. The self-assessment approach in audiology: State of the art. Audiology 1983; 8: 157–71.

29.

McCarthy

Alpiner

. The McCarthy-Alpiner scale of hearing handicap. In: Alpiner

, ed. Handbook of adult rehabilitative audiology (revised). Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1981.

30.

Pichora-Fuller

. Questionnaires in aural rehabilitation assessment. Presented at the Annual Convention of the Canadian Speech and Hearing Association, Montreal, May 1983.

31.

Giolas

. Hearing-handicapped adults. Toronto: Prentice Hall, 1982.

32.

Wang

Erdman

. Development of the communication profile for the hearing-impaired. Poster Session, American Speech and Hearing Association Convention, November 1982, Toronto.

33.

Pichora-Fuller

Corbin

Riko

Alberti

. A review of current approaches to aural rehabilitation. Int Rehab Med 1983; 5: 58–66.