Results obtained with cochlear electrode implants in totally deaf patients indicate that this means of transmitting auditory information can be of great help in lipreading and remote sound contact. However, using an alternate approach involving fenestration of the labyrinth and acoustical stimulation of the vestibular nerve, we generated a signal in an animal model superior in quality to that generated by electrical stimulation of the cochlea of the cat. This communication raises the question of whether a vestibular signal could be processed so that a deaf person could hear and identify sounds.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
KeidelWD. The cochlear model in skin stimulation. In: GeldardFA ed. Proceedings of the conference on cutaneous communication systems and devices. US Dept of Defense publication No. (ONR) 76–12631. Government Printing Office, 1973: 27–32.
SpoendlinH. Retrograde degeneration of the cochlear nerve. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh)1975; 79: 266–75.
4.
Leake-JonesPAWalshSMMerzenichMM. Cochlear pathology following chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol1981; 90 (suppl 82) :6–8.
5.
KiangNYSMoxonEC. Physiological considerations in artificial stimulation of the inner ear. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol1972; 81: 714–30.
6.
BleekerJDWitHPSegenhoutJH. Evidence for sound perception with the labyrinth. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh)1980; 89: 76–84.
7.
WitHPBleekerJDSegenhoutJH. Vestibular and cochlear responses to acoustic transients; some properties of whole nerve action potentials in pigeons. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh)1981; 92: 409–23.
8.
WitHPBleekerJD. Sensitivity of the vestibular system to acoustic stimuli. Arch Otorhinolaryngol1982; 234: 205–11.
9.
WeverEG. The reptile ear. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1978: 975.
