Compound action-potential tuning curves, using a forward-masking paradigm, were developed on both a control group and a group of acoustically traumatized cats. Differences observed between the two populations included a decrease in the sharpness of the tip, in the sensitivity of the tip, and/or in the sensitivity of the tail region. Phase-contrast light microscopy was performed on all exposed ears using a celloidin-embedding technique with horizontal sectioning. Whenever an abnormality in an action-potential tuning curve was seen, histological evidence of damage to the organ of Corti in an appropriate region corresponding to the signal frequency was observed. However, several cases of damage to the cochlea were observed with normal tuning curves. Whenever the tip region of the tuning curve was elevated, evidence of damage to all three rows of outer hair cells and to the inner hair cells was seen.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
TasakiI. Nerve impulses in individual auditory nerve fibers of guinea pig. J Neurophysiol1954; 17:97–122.
2.
KiangNYSWatanabeTThomasECClarkLF. Discharge patterns of single fibers in the cat's auditory nerve. Research Monograph No 35. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1965.
3.
KiangNYSMoxonEC. Tails of tuning curves of auditory nerve fibers. J Acoust Soc Am1974; 55:620–30.
4.
ChistovichLA. Frequency characteristics of masking effect. Biophysiology1957; 2:714–20.
5.
SmallAM. Pure tone masking. J Acoust Soc Am1959; 31:1619–25.
6.
ZwickerE. On a psychoacoustical equivalent of tuning curves. In: ZwickertETerhardtE, eds. Facts and models in hearing. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1974:132–41.
7.
HoutgastT. Psychophysical experiments on “tuning curves” and “two-tone inhibition”. Acoustica1973; 29:168–79.
8.
MooreBCJ. Psychophysical tuning curves measured in simultaneous and forward masking. J Acoust Soc Am1978; 63:524–32.
HarrisDM. Action potential suppression, tuning curves and thresholds: Comparison with single fiber data. Hear Res1979; 1:133–54.
11.
AbbasPJGorgaMP. AP responses in forward masking paradigms and their relationship to responses of auditory nerve fibers. J Acoust Soc Am1981; 69:492–9.
12.
HarrisonRV. Rate-versus-intensity functions and related AP responses in normal and pathological guinea pig and human cochleas. J Acoust Soc Am1981; 70:1036–44.
13.
EggermontJJ. Compound action potential tuning curves in normal and pathological human ears. J Acoust Soc Am1977; 62:1247–51.
14.
HarrisonRVAranJMErreJP. AP tunning curves from normal and pathological human and guinea pig cochleas. J Acoust Soc Am1981; 69:1374–85.
15.
WightmanFMcGeeTKramerM. Factors influencing frequency selectivity in normal and hearing-impaired listeners. In: EvansEFWilsonJP, eds. Psychophysics and physiology of hearing. New York: Academic Press, 1977.
16.
GorgaMPAbbasPJ. Forward-masking AP tuning curves in normal and in acoustically traumatized ears. J Acoust Soc Am1981; 70:1322–30.
17.
LibermanCMKiangNYS. Acoustic trauma in cats, cochlear pathology and auditory-nerve activity. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh)1978; 358:1–63.
18.
SoudijnER. Scanning electron microscopic study of the organ of Corti in normal and sound damaged guinea pigs. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol1976; 85:(suppl 29).
19.
WardWDDuvallAJ. Behavioral and ultrastructural correlates of acoustic trauma. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol1971; 80:881–96.
20.
HendersonDHHamernikRPSitlerRW. Audiometric and histological correlates of exposure to 1-msec noise-impulses in the chinchilla. J Acoust Soc Am1974; 56:1210–21.
21.
SchuknechtHF. Pathology of the ear. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1974.
22.
GuildSR. A graphic reconstruction method for the study of the organ of Corti. Anat Rec1921; 22:141–57.
23.
SchuknechtHF. Techniques for study of cochlear function and pathology in experimental animals. Arch Otolaryngol1953; 58:377–97.
24.
KiangNYSMoxonEC. Tails of tuning curves of auditory nerve fibers. J Acoust Soc Am1974; 55:620–30.
25.
PriceGR. Action potentials in the cat at low sound intensities: Thresholds, latencies, and rates of change. J Acoust Soc Am1978; 64:1400–5.
26.
SpoendlinHHBrunJP. Relation of structural damage to exposure time and intensity in acoustic trauma. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh)1973; 75:220–6.
27.
LimDJMelnickW. Acoustic damage of the cochlea. Arch Otolaryngol1971; 94:294–305.
28.
KiangNYSMoxonECLevineRA. Auditory-nerve activity in cats with normal and abnormal cochleas. In: WolstenholmeGEWKnightJ, eds. Sensorineural hearing loss, Ciba symposium. London: J & A Churchill, 1970:241–73.
29.
EvansEF. Auditory frequency selectivity and the cochlear nerve. In: ZwickerETerhart, eds. Facts and models in hearing. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1974:118–29.
