Auditory Brainstem and Middle Latency Evoked Response Sensitivity near Threshold

Abstract

Auditory brainstem response (ABR) and middle latency evoked response (MLER) testing have been used successfully for assessing hearing sensitivity electrophysiologically. Though both procedures have their proponents, ABR seems to be the more popular of the two. However, this study shows that overall, MLER waves occur with greater frequency at low sensation levels than ABR waves. Specifically, MLER wave P_a was the most sensitive wave, followed by ABR wave V, MLER wave P_b, ABR wave III, MLER wave P_c, and ABR wave I. Latencies were more consistent and predictable for ABR than MLER. However, as expected, amplitudes for MLER waves were greater than those for ABR. Given these results, those involved in measuring hearing sensitivity electrophysiologically are encouraged to consider the potential of the MLER measure and not limit their scope of assessment to ABR.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Hecox

Galambos

Brainstem auditory evoked responses in human infants and adults. Arch Otolaryngol 1974; 99: 30–3.

Davis

Principles of electric response audiometry. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1976; 85 Suppl 28: 5–96.

Brackmann

Electric response audiometry in a clinical practice. Laryngoscope 1977; 87 Suppl 5.

Ruhm

Walker

Flanigan

Acoustically evoked potentials in man: mediation of early components. Laryngoscope 1967; 77: 806–22.

Mendel

Goldstein

Stability of early components of the average electroencephalic response. J Speech Hear Res 1969; 12: 351–61.

Thornton

Mendel

Anderson

Effects of stimulus frequency and intensity on the middle components of the average auditory electrocephalic response. J Speech Hear Res 1977; 20: 81–94.

Picton

Woods

Barbeau-Braum

Healey

Evoked potential audiometry. J Otolaryngol 1977; 6: 90–119.

McCandless

Neuroelectric measures of auditory function. In: Rose

Audiological assessment. Vol 2. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1978.

Carhart

Jerger

Preferred method for clinical determination of pure tone thresholds. J Speech Hear Disord 1959; 24: 330–45.

10.

Goldstein

Rodman

Early components of average evoked responses to rapidly repeated auditory stimuli. J Speech Hear Res 1967; 10: 697–705.

11.

McFarland

Vivion

Goldstein

Middle components of the AER to tone pips in normal hearing and hearing impaired subjects. J Speech Hear Res 1977; 20: 781–98.

12.

Starr

Achor

Auditory brain stem responses in neurological disease. Arch Neurol 1975; 32: 761–8.

13.

Kavanagh

Beardsley

Brain stem auditory evoked response. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1979; 88 Suppl 58: 1–28.

14.

Jewett

Williston

Auditory evoked far fields averaged from the scalp of humans. Brain 1971; 94: 681–96.

15.

Wolfe

Goldstein

Middle component averaged electrocephalic responses to tonal stimuli for normal neonates. Arch Otolaryngol 1978; 104: 508–18.

16.

Chiappa

Gladstone

Young

Brain stem auditory evoked responses: studies of waveform variations of 50 normal human subjects. Arch Neurol 1979; 36: 81–7.

17.

Gilroy

Lynn

Ristow

Pellerin

Auditory evoked brain stem potentials in case of locked-in syndrome. Arch Neurol 1977; 34: 492–5.

18.

Stockard

Rossiter

Clinical and pathological correlates of brain stem auditory response abnormalities. Neurology 1977; 27: 316–25.

19.

Madell

Goldstein

Relation between loudness and the amplitude of the early components of the averaged electroencephalic response. J Speech Hear Res 1972; 15: 134–41.

20.

Gutnick

Goldstein

Effect of contralateral noise on the middle components of the averaged electroencephalic response. J Speech Hear Res 1978; 21: 613–24.

21.

Zerlin

Naunton

Early and late averaged electroencephalic responses at low sensation levels. Audiology 1974; 13: 366–78.

22.

Jerger

Mauldin

Prediction of sensori-neural hearing level from the brainstem evoked response. Arch Otolaryngol 1978; 104: 456–61.