The view is expressed that many hearing-impaired individuals are not deriving maximum benefit from amplification or are not using amplification at all because of failure of professionals to keep in mind certain uses and abuses. Some of the specific uses are for minimal and profound hearing losses, adaptation with special earmold modifications, chronic or recurrent conductive losses, part-time use, and binaural listening. Some specific abuses include: unrealistic expectations, overlooking the role of motivation, pressuring persons to try/wear amplification, overamplification, Y cord, inappropriate binaural fittings, and failure to alternate a hearing aid between ears in symmetrical hearing losses.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
RossMBarrettLSTrierTR. Ear-level hearing aids for motivated patients with minimal hearing losses. Laryngoscope1966; 76: 1555–61.
2.
RossM. Changing concepts in hearing aid candidacy. Eye Ear Nose Throat Mon1969; 48: 27–34.
3.
HarfordEBarryJA. A rehabilitative approach to the problem of unilateral hearing impairment: The contralateral routing of signals (CROS). J Speech Hear Disord1965; 30: 121–38.
4.
HarfordEDoddsE. The clinical application of CROS: A hearing aid for unilateral deafness. Arch Otolaryngol1966; 83: 455–64.
5.
GreenDSRossM. The effect of a conventional versus a nonoccluding (CROS-type) earmold upon the frequency response of a hearing aid. J Speech Hear Res1968; 11: 638–47.
6.
GreenDS. Non-occluding ear molds with CROS and IROS hearing aids. Arch Otolaryngol1969; 89: 512–22.
7.
HarfordE. Bilateral CROS: Two-sided listening with one hearing aid. Arch Otolaryngol1966; 84: 426–32.
8.
HarrisJD. Monaural and binaural speech intelligibility and the stereophonic effect based upon temporal cues. Laryngoscope1965; 75: 428–46.
9.
LickliderJCR. Basic correlates of the auditory stimulus. In: StevensSS, ed. Handbook of experimental psychology. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1951.
10.
RossM. Classroom acoustics and speech intelligibility. In: KatzJ, ed. Handbook of clinical audiology. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1972.
11.
KeithRWSinigerL. Changing concepts in hearing aid selection. Hear Instr1978; 29: 6–8, 34.
12.
WaldenBESchuchmanGISedgeRK. The reliability and validity of the comfort level method of setting hearing aid gain. J Speech Hear Disord1977; 42: 455–61.
13.
RossJHuntMFKesslerMHenigesMP. The use of a rating scale to compare binaural and monaural amplification with hearing impaired children. Volta Rev1974; 76: 93–9.
