The response characteristics of auditory-nerve fibers in normal cats are compared with those in cats exposed to kanamycin and high-intensity sounds. The pathophysiology is characterized by an elevation of the tuning-curve “tips,” which is sometimes associated with hypersensitivity of the “tails.” Plots of unit thresholds are correlated with patterns of sensory-cell losses in the cochlea. There can be significant shifts in unit threshold without significant loss of hair cells; however, significant hair cell loss is always accompanied by highly abnormal unit thresholds. The presence of inner hair cells seems to be essential for the long-term survival of spiral ganglion cells. An incidental observation is that in the “normal” animal there is almost always a prominent “notch” at 3–4 kHz in the plots of threshold at characteristic frequency, which may have been produced by environmental noise.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
LurieMHDavisHHawkinsJEJr.: Acoustic trauma of the organ of Corti in the guinea pig. Laryngoscope54: 375–386, 1944.
2.
HawkinsJEJr.: The ototoxicity of kanamycin. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol68: 698–715, 1959.
KellerhalsB: Acoustic trauma and cochlear microcirculation. Adv Otorhinolaryngol18: 91–168, 1972.
5.
MatzGJ: Toxic cochlear and vestibular disorders, in TowerDB, (ed): The Nervous System, Vol 3: Human Comunication and Its Disorders. New York: Raven Press, 1975, pp 333–349.
6.
KiangNYSMoxonECLevineRA: Auditory-nerve activity in cats with normal and abnormal cochleas, in WolstenholmeGEWKnightJ, (eds): Sensorineural Hearing Loss. London: J & A Churchill, 1970, pp 241–268.
7.
SchuknechtHF: Techniques for study of cochlear function and pathology in experimental animals. Arch Otolaryngol58: 377–397, 1953.
8.
SpoendlinH: Innervation densities of the cochlea. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh)73: 235–248, 1972.
9.
KiangNYSWatanabeTThomasEC: Discharge Patterns of Single Fibers in the Cat's Auditory Nerve. Research Monograph No. 35, Cambridge, Mass., M.I.T. Press, 1965.
10.
LindsayJRProctorLRWorkWP: Histopathologic inner ear changes in deafness due to neomycin in the human. Laryngoscope70: 382–392, 1960.
11.
KerrASchuknechtHF: The spiral ganglion in profound deafness. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh)65: 586–598, 1968.
12.
HouseWFUrbanJ: Long term results of electrode implantation and electronic stimulation of the cochlea in man. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol82: 504–510, 1973.
13.
MerzenichMMMichelsonRPSchindlerRA: Neural encoding of sound sensation evoked by electrical stimulation of the acoustic nerve. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol82: 486–503, 1973.
14.
KiangNYSMoxonEC: Physiological considerations in artificial stimulation of the inner ear. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol81: 714–730, 1972.
15.
WardWD: Acoustic trauma and noise-induced hearing loss, in TowerDB, (ed): The Nervous System, “Vol 3: Human Communication and Its Disorders. New York: Raven Press, 1975, pp 221–229.
16.
TaylorWPearsonJMairA: Study of noise and hearing in jute weaving. J Acoust Soc Am38: 113–120, 1965.
17.
MillerJDWatsonCSCovellWP: Deafening effects of noise on the cat. Acta Otolaryngol [Suppl] (Stockh)176, 1963.
18.
WeinerFMPfeifferRRBackusASN: On the sound pressure transformation by the head and auditory meatus of the cat. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh)61: 255–269, 1965.
ZwickerE: On a psychoacoustical equivalent of tuning curves, in ZwickerETerhardtE, (eds): Facts and Models in Hearing. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1974, pp 132–141.
21.
HoutgastT: Lateral Suppression in Hearing, doctoral dissertation. Institute for Perception TNO, University of Amsterdam, 1974.
22.
VogtenLLM: Pure-tone masking; a new result from a new method, in ZwickerETerhardtE, (eds): Facts and Models in Hearing. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1974, pp 142–155.
23.
SalmivalliA: Acoustic trauma in regular army personnel. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh)Suppl 222, 1967.
24.
KiangNYS: Stimulus representation in the discharge patterns of auditory neurons, in TowerDB, (ed): The Nervous System, Vol 3: Human Communication and Its Disorders. New York: Raven Press, 1975, pp 81–96.
25.
SchuknechtHF: Neuroanatomical correlates of auditory sensitivity and pitch discrimination in the cat, in RasmussenGLWindleWF, (eds): Neural Mechanisms of the Auditory and Vestibular Systems. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas, 1960, pp 76–90.
26.
DolanTRAdesHWBredbergG: Inner ear damage and hearing loss after exposure to tones of high intensity. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh)80: 343–352, 1975.
27.
KiangNYSMoxonEC: Tails of tuning curves of auditory-nerve fibers. J Acoust Soc Am55: 620–630, 1974.
28.
RobertsonD: Cochlear neurons: Frequency selectivity altered by perilymph removal. Science186: 153–155, 1974.
29.
EvansEF: Auditory frequency selectivity and the cochlear nerve, in ZwickerETerhardtE, (eds): Facts and Models in Hearing. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1974, pp 118–129.
30.
EvansEFWilsonJP: The frequency selectivity of the cochlea, in MøllerAR, (ed): Basic Mechanisms in Hearing. New York: Academic Press, 1973, pp 519–551.
31.
EvansEFWilsonJP: Cochlear tuning properties: Concurrent basilar membrane and single nerve fiber measurements. Science190: 1218–1221, 1975.
32.
KohllöffelLUE: A study of basilar membrane vibrations III. The basilar membrane frequency response curve in the living guinea pig. Acustica27: 82–89, 1972.
33.
WilsonJPJohnstoneJR: Basilar membrane and middle-ear vibration in guinea pig measured by capacitive probe. J Acoust Soc Am57: 705–723, 1975.
34.
RhodeWS: Observations of the vibration of the basilar membrane in squirrel monkeys using the Mössbauer technique. J Acoust Soc Am49: 1218–1231, 1971.
35.
JohnstoneBMYatesGK: Basilar membrane tuning curves in the guinea pig. J Acoust Soc Am55: 584–587, 1974.
36.
HelfensteinWM: Beitrag zur messung der akustisch bedingten bewegungen und identifikation des mechanischen teils des Innenohrs der kotze, doctoral dissertation. Eid-genoessischen Technischen Hochschule Zurich, Institut für Automatik und Industrielle Elektronik, 1973.
37.
RyanADallosP: Effect of absence of cochlear outer hair cells on behavioural auditory threshold. Nature253: 44–46, 1975.
38.
ZwislockiJJSokolichWG: Neuro-mechanical frequency analysis in the cochlea. in ZwickerETerhardtE, (eds): Facts and Models in Hearing. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1974, pp 107–117.
39.
BeagleyHA: Acoustic trauma in the guinea pig II. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh)60: 480–495, 1965.
40.
SpoendlinH: Auditory, vestibular, olfactory and gustatory organs, in BischoffA, (ed): Ultrastructure of the Peripheral Nervous System and Sense Organs. St. Louis: CV Mosby Co., 1970, pp 173–337.
41.
EngströmHAdesHWBredbergG: Normal structure of the organ of Corti and the effect of noise-induced cochlear damage, in WolstenholmeGEWKnightJ, (eds): Sensorineural Hearing Loss. London: J & A Churchill, 1970, pp 127–152.
42.
LimDJMelnickW: Acoustic damage of the cochlea. Arch Otolaryngol94: 294–305, 1971.
43.
LindemanHHBredbergG: Scanning electron microscopy of the organ of Corti after intense auditory stimulation: Effects on stereocilia and cuticular surface of hair cells. Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd203: 1–15, 1972.
44.
BohneBAEldredgeDHMillsJH: Cochlear potentials and electron microscopy applied to the study of small cochlear lesions. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol82: 595–608, 1973.
45.
SpoendlinHBrunJP: Relation of structural damage to exposure time and intensity in acoustic trauma. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh)75: 220–226, 1973.
46.
WërsallJ: Problems and pitfalls in studies of cochlear hair cell pathology, in MøllerAR, (ed): Basic Mechanisms in Hearing. New York: Academic Press, 1973, pp 235–256.
47.
IuratoS: Fibre efferenti dirette e crociate alle cellule acustiche dell ‘organo del Corti. Monitore Zoologico ItalianoSuppl 72: 62–63, 1964.
48.
WiederholdML: Variations in the effects of electric stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on cat single auditory-nerve-fiber responses to tone bursts. J Acoust Soc Am48: 966–977, 1970.
49.
SpoendlinH: Neuroanatomy of the cochlea, in ZwickerETerhardtE, (eds): Facts and Models in Hearing. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1974, pp 18–32.
