BredbergG: Cellular pattern and nerve supply of the human organ of Corti. Acta OtolaryngSuppl 236, 1968.
2.
DavisH: Acoustic trauma in the guinea pig. J Acoust Soc Amer25: 1180–1189, 1953.
3.
DieroffHGBeckC: Experimentellmikroskopische Studie zur Frage der Lokalisation von bleibenden Hörschäden nach Industrielärmbelastung mit tonalen Geräuschanteilen. Arch Klin Exp Ohr Nas Kehlkopfheilk184: 33–45, 1964.
4.
DuvallAT: Ultrastructure of lateral cochlear wall following intermixing of fluids. Ann Otol77: 317–331, 1968.
5.
DuvallAJQuickCASutherlandCR: Transport of horseradish peroxidase in the lateral cochlear wall. Arch Otolaryng93: 304–316, 1971.
6.
DuvallAJRhodesVT: Ultrastructure of the organ of Corti following intermixing of cochlear fluids. Ann Otol76: 688–709, 1967.
7.
EldredgeDHBilgerRCDavisH: Factor analysis of cochlear injuries and changes in electrophysiological potentials following acoustic trauma in the guinea pig. J Acoust Soc Amer33: 152–159, 1961.
8.
EldredgeDHCovellWPDavisH: Recovery from acoustic trauma in the guinea pig. Laryngoscope67: 66–84, 1957.
9.
EldredgeDHMillerJD: Acceptable noise exposures—Damage risk criteria. In: WardWDFrickeJE (Ed.) Noise as a Public Health Hazard. ASHA Reports No. 4, 1969, pp 110–120.
10.
ElliottDNMcGeeTM: Effect of cochlear lesions upon audiograms and intensity discrimination in cats. Ann Otol74: 386–408, 1965.
11.
EngstromHAdesHW: Effect of high intensity noise on inner ear sensory epithelia. Acta Oto-laryng158: 219–229, 1960.
12.
EngstromHAdesHWAnderssonA: Cytoarchitecture of the normal and pathologically altered inner ear. Hals Nasen Ohrenheilk, Zwanglose Schriftenreihe20: 35–53, 1968.
13.
HabermanJ: Ueber die Schwerhörigkeit der Kesselschmiede. Arch Ohrenheilk30: 1–25, 1890.
14.
IgarashiMSchuknechtHFMyersEN: Cochlear pathology in humans with stimulation deafness. J Laryng78: 115–123, 1964.
15.
KohonenA: Effects of some ototoxic drugs upon the pattern and innervation of cochlear sensory cells in the guinea pig. Acta Oto-laryng208: 1–70, 1966.
16.
KoitchevKA: Electronmicroscopic study of Corti's organ under conditions of relative quiescence and after application of sound stimulation. Arkh Anat Gistol Embriol56: 45–53, 1969.
17.
LawrenceM: Histological evidence for localized radial flow of endolymph. Arch Otolaryng83: 24–30, 1966.
18.
LawrenceMYantisPS: Individual differences in functional recovery and structural repair following overstimulation of the guinea pig ear. Ann Otol66: 595–621, 1957.
19.
MillerJD: Audibility curve of the chinchilla. J Acoust Soc Amer48: 513–523, 1970.
20.
MillerJDWatsonCSCovellWE: Deafening effects of noise on the cat. Acta Oto-laryngSuppl 176, 1963.
21.
NakamuraS: Some of the basic problems in noise trauma. Jap J Otol (Tokyo)67: 1669–1684, 1964.
22.
PeyserA: Gesundheitswesen u. Krankenfürsorge. Theoretische und experimentelle Grundlagen des persönlichen Schallschutzes. Dtsch med Wochenschr56: 150–151, 1930.
23.
QuickCADuvallAJ: Early changes in the cochlear duct from ethacrynic acid: An electronmicroscopic evaluation. Laryngoscope80: 954–965, 1970.
24.
SchuknechtHF: Lesions of the organ of Corti. Trans AAOO57: 366–382, 1953.
25.
SchuknechtHFNeffWDPerlmanHB: An experimental study of auditory damage following blows to the head. Ann Otol60: 273–289, 1951.
26.
SpoendlinH: The organization of the cochlear receptor. In: Advances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Vol. 13, RuediL (Ed), Basel, S. Karger, 1966.
27.
StockwellCWAdesHWEngstromH: Patterns of hair cell damage after intense auditory stimulation. Ann Otol78: 1144–1168, 1969.
