FairbanksG.: Test of Phonomic Differentiation: The Rhyme Test. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer.30:596, 1958.
3.
Falbe-HansenJ.: Clinical and Experimental Histological Studies on Effects of Salicylate and Quinine on the Ear. Supp. 44, Acta Otolaryng., 1941.
4.
HarbertF.YoungI. M.: Threshold Auditory Adaptation. J. Aud. Res.2:229, 1962.
5.
HarrisJ. D.: Recovery Curves and Equinoxious Exposures in Reversible Auditory Fatigue Following Stimulation up to 140 db Plus. Laryngoscope63:660, 1953.
6.
HarrisJ. D.HainesH. L.KelseyP. A.ClackT. D.: The Relation Between Speech Intelligibility and the Electro-acoustic Characteristics of Low Fidelity Circuitry. J. Aud. Res.1:357, 1961.
7.
HarrisJ. D.HainesH. L.MyersC. K.: Brief Tone Audiometry: Temporal Integration in the Hypoacusic. Arch. Otolaryngol.67:699, 1958.
8.
HirshI. J.BilgerR. C.: Auditory Threshold Recovery After Exposure to Pure-tones. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer.27:1186, 1955.
9.
HirshI. J.WardW. D.: Recovery of the Auditory Threshold After Strong Acoustic Stimulation. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer.24:131, 1952.
10.
LightfootC.: Contribution to the Study of Auditory Fatigue. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer.27:356, 1955.
11.
Miskolczy-FodorF.: The Relation Between Hearing Loss and Recruitment and Its Practical Employment in the Determination of Receptive Hearing Losses. Acta Otolaryng.46:409, 1956.