III The Relation between Hearing Loss for Specific Frequencies and the Distance at Which Speech Can Be Identified

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Fletcher

: Speech and Hearing, New York, D. Van Nostrand Co., Inc., 1936.

Fowler

E. P.

: Hearing Standards for Acceptance, Disability Rating and Discharge in the Military Service and in Industry, Laryngoscope 51:937–956 (Oct.) 1941.

Steinberg

J. C.

Gardner

M. B.

: On the Auditory Significance of the Term Hearing Loss, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 11:270–277 (Jan.) 1940.

Bunch

C. C.

: In Discussion in Military Symposium, Tr. Am. Laryng., Rhin. and Otol. Soc. 31:300–301, 1941.

Beasley

W. C.

: The National Health Survey; Hearing Studies Series, Bull. 2, U. S. Treas. Dept., Public Health Service, 1938.

Harris

J. D.

: Free Voice and Pure Tone Audiometer for Routine Testing of Auditory Acuity, Arch. Otolaryng. 44:452–467 (Oct.) 1946.

Goldman

J. L.

: A Comparative Study of Whisper Tests and Audiograms, Laryngoscope 54:559–572, 1944.

MacFarlan

: Speech Hearing and Speech Interpretation Testing, Arch. Otolaryng. 31:517–528, 1940.

Hughson

Thompson

: Correlation of Hearing Acuity for Speech with Discrete Frequency Audiograms, Arch. Otolaryng. 36:526–540, 1942.

10.

Fletcher

: Op. cit. p. 202–206.

11.

Edwards

: Statistical Analysis, New York, Rinehart & Co., 1946.

12.

Carter

H. A.

: Tentative Standard Procedure for Evaluating the Percentage Loss of Hearing in Medicolegal Cases, J. A. M. A. 133:396–397 (Feb.) 1947.

13.

Hughson

Thompson

: Op. cit. p. 534.

14.

Edwards

: Op. cit. p. 95.

15.

Edwards

: Op. cit. p. 98.