Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Sinonasal Malignancies and Beyond

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Peterson

Miller

Ioerger

, et al. Most-cited patient-reported outcome measures within otolaryngology-revisiting the minimal clinically important difference: a review. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023;149(3):261-276. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2022.4703

Kean

. PROMS can help with patient outcomes and with patient-centered research. Triological Society. 2024. Accessed November 1, 2025. https://www.enttoday.org/article/proms-can-help-with-patient-outcomes-and-with-patient-centered-research/?singlepage=1

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Overview Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. 2025. Accessed December 13, 2025. https://mmshub.cms.gov/about-quality/types/proms/overview

Hopkins

Gillett

Slack

Lund

Browne

JP.

Psychometric validity of the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test. Clin Otolaryngol. 2009;34(5):447-454. doi:10.1111/j.1749-4486.2009.01995.x

Liu

Weitzel

Chen

PG.

The predictive utility of the 22-item sino-nasal outcome test (SNOT-22): a scoping review. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2022;12(1):83-102. doi:10.1002/alr.22888

Risoli

Kuchibhatla

Chan

Hachem

Jang

DW.

Symptom profile of chronic rhinosinusitis versus obstructive sleep apnea in a tertiary rhinology clinic. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2019;128(10):963-969. doi:10.1177/0003489419851527

Lal

Rounds

Rank

Divekar

Clinical and 22-item sino-nasal outcome test symptom patterns in primary headache disorder patients presenting to otolaryngologists with “sinus” headaches, pain or pressure. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2015;5(5):408-416. doi:10.1002/alr.21502

Liu

Gardner

Woodworth

, et al. Individual SNOT-22 items aid in differentiating between spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea and chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2023;132(6):698-704. doi:10.1177/00034894221111256

Liu

Woodworth

Kanaan

, et al. SNOT-22 quality of life scores improve after endoscopic endonasal repair of spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2023;132(9):1077-1084. doi:10.1177/00034894221133769

10.

Phillips

Hoehle

Caradonna

Gray

Sedaghat

AR.

Minimal clinically important difference for the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test in medically managed patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Clin Otolaryngol. 2018;43(5):1328-1334. doi:10.1111/coa.13177

11.

Phillips

Houssein

Boeckermann

Singerman

Liu

Sedaghat

AR.

Multi-institutional minimal clinically important difference of the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test in medically managed chronic rhinosinusitis. Rhinology. 2021;59(6):552-559. doi:10.4193/Rhin21.253

12.

Aboueisha

Fernández-Penny

Hodges

, et al. Patient factors influence minimal clinically important difference for the SNOT-22 in medically treated chronic rhinosinusitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2025;15(5):483-491. doi:10.1002/alr.23510

13.

Maoz

Wang

Hwang

, et al. Long-term quality of life after treatment in sinonasal malignancy: a prospective, multicenter study. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2023;13(11):2030-2042. doi:10.1002/alr.23171

14.

Jozaghi

Phan

Hanna

Kupferman

SY.

Functional outcomes and quality of life in patients with sinonasal, nasopharyngeal, and anterior skull base tumors. Curr Oncol Rep. 2022;24(6):775-781. doi:10.1007/s11912-022-01214-2

15.

Fleseriu

Beswick

Maoz

, et al. Predictive factors for decreased baseline quality of life in patients with sinonasal malignancies. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2024;14(4):775-785. doi:10.1002/alr.23261

16.

de Almeida

Vescan

Gullane

, et al. Development of a disease-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for anterior and central skull base pathology—The skull base inventory. Laryngoscope. 2012;122(9):1933-1942. doi:10.1002/lary.23426

17.

Forner

Hueniken

Yoannidis

, et al. Psychometric testing of the skull base inventory health-related quality of life questionnaire in a multi-institutional study of patients undergoing open and endoscopic surgery. Qual Life Res. 2021;30(1):293-301. doi:10.1007/s11136-020-02609-z

18.

Chow

Tsetsos

Poutoglidis

Georgalas

Quality of life in sinonasal tumors: an up-to-date review. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022;30(1):46-57. doi:10.1097/MOO.0000000000000774

19.

DeConde

Bodner

Mace

Smith

TL.

Response shift in quality of life after endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;140(8):712-719. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2014.1045

20.

Patel

Raza

McCoul

, et al. Long-term quality of life after endonasal endoscopic resection of adult craniopharyngiomas. J Neurosurg. 2015;123(3):571-580. doi:10.3171/2014.12.JNS141591

21.

Phillips

Sedaghat

AR.

Depression and anxiety: considerations for interpretation of the SNOT-22 (22-Item Sinonasal Outcome Test). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022;166(5):985-992. doi:10.1177/01945998211059732

22.

Hostetter

Klein

. Using patient-reported outcomes to improve health care quality. 2020. Accessed November 1, 2025. https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/newsletter-article/using-patient-reported-outcomes-improve-health-care-quality

23.

Amin

Davis

Thapa

, et al. Exploring completion rates of the SNOT-22 questionnaire. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2025;134(6):459-462. doi:10.1177/00034894251320303