Abstract
Background:
The role of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) in diagnosing parotid tumors remains debated due to varying accuracy. This study evaluates FNA’s accuracy in diagnosing Warthin’s tumor (WT) and its safety in guiding observational management.
Study design:
Retrospective cohort study.
Setting:
Single institution, Tertiary referral center.
Methods:
Data from 2010 to 2022 including demographics, cytology, pathology, and surgical outcomes were extracted. Accuracy was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV).
Results:
Among 808 patients with parotid tumors, 234 were WTs. Seventy-eight patients underwent surgery with pathology while 156 underwent observation. FNA sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for WTs were 98.2%, 98.1%, 91.8%, and 99.6% respectively. No observational patients developed clinical signs of malignancy, and the median change in tumor size was 0 cm (range −3.1 to 2.1).
Conclusions:
FNA is highly specific for WT but limited by nondiagnostic results. Observation is a safe approach with minimal risk of growth, malignancy, or infection.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
