Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Purpose:

To evaluate the recent Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (OTO-HNS) applicant characteristics, to identify which applicant characteristics are associated with successful match into OTO-HNS, and to compare OTO-HNS applicant trends and characteristics to that of peer surgical specialties (PS).

Materials and Methods:

Data were obtained from official reports by the National Residency Matching Program (NRMP) for OTO-HNS, plastic and reconstructive surgery, orthopedic surgery, neurosurgery, and dermatology from 2006 to 2019. Alpha Omega Alpha (AOA) membership, United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) scores, research productivity, graduation from a top-40 NIH-funded U.S. medical school, and additional graduate degree were recorded. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated to evaluate the relationship between applicant qualifications and match success.

Results:

From 2014 to 2018, the OTO-HNS applicant pool shrunk from 443 to 333, representing the largest drop of all PS. Furthermore, OTO-HNS reported the most unfilled positions and highest match rates in 2017 (n = 14; 92.1%) and 2018 (n = 12; 94.6%) among any PS. Despite recent trends, 2019 NRMP data revealed a 38.74% increase in OTO-HNS applicant numbers compared to 2018. AOA membership (OR, 7.3; P = .030), USMLE Step 2 scores between 241 and 260 (OR, 6.5; P = .009), and research productivity (OR, 5.6; P = .005) significantly increased the odds of matching into OTO-HNS.

Conclusions:

Despite recent fluctuations in application trends, OTO-HNS continues to successfully match highly qualified applicants, including applicants with AOA membership, high Step 2 scores, and high research productivity. An understanding of the qualifications used to evaluate residency applicants may be helpful to both applicants and residency programs of OTO-HNS.

Keywords

match residency USMLE residency selection otolaryngology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Salehi

Heiser

Salehi

, et al. Ideas and innovations to improve the otolaryngology-head and neck surgery residency application and selection process. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020:194599820961989. doi:10.1177/0194599820961989

National Resident Matching Program. Results and data: 2017 main residency match ®. The Match. https://mk0nrmp3oyqui6wqfm.kinstacdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Main-Match-Results-and-Data-2017.pdf. 2017. Accessed June 1, 2020.

National Resident Matching Program. Results and data: 2018 main residency match ®. The Match. https://mk0nrmp3oyqui6wqfm.kinstacdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Main-Match-Result-and-Data-2018.pdf. 2018. Accessed June 1, 2020.

National Resident Matching Program. Results and data: 2019 main residency match ®. The Match. https://mk0nrmp3oyqui6wqfm.kinstacdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/NRMP-Results-and-Data-2019_04112019_final.pdf. 2019. Accessed June 1, 2020.

Salehi

Benito

Michaelides

A novel approach to the national resident matching program-the star system. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;144(5):397-398. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2018.0068

Hauser

Gebhard

Blumhagen

Carlson

Cabrera-Muffly

Applicant characteristics associated with successful matching into otolaryngology. Laryngoscope. 2017;127(5):1052-1057. doi:10.1002/lary.26236

Cabrera-Muffly

Sheeder

Abaza

State of otolaryngology match: has competition increased since the “early” match?

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;152(5):838-842. doi:10.1177/0194599815571318

Salehi

Azizzadeh

Lee

YH.

Pass/fail scoring of USMLE step 1 and the need for residency selection reform. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020:194599820951166. doi:10.1177/0194599820951166

Abraham

Nguyen

Weber

RA.

Integrated plastic surgery residency applicant trends and comparison with other surgical specialties. Ann Plast Surg. 2018;80(2):164-170. doi:10.1097/SAP.0000000000001199

10.

McMackin

Caputo

Hoell

Trani

Carpenter

Lombardi

JV.

Trends in the 10-year history of the vascular integrated residency match: More work, higher cost, same result. J Vasc Surg. 2020;72(1):298-303. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2019.10.066

11.

Trikha

Keswani

Ishmael

Greig

Kelley

Bernthal

NM.

Current trends in orthopaedic surgery residency applications and match rates. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020;102(6):e24. doi:10.2106/JBJS.19.00930

12.

National Resident Matching Program. Results and data: 2006 main residency match ®. https://mk0nrmp3oyqui6wqfm.kinstacdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/resultsanddata2006.pdf. 2006. Accessed June 1, 2020.

13.

National Resident Matching Program. Results and data: 2007 main residency match ®. https://mk0nrmp3oyqui6wqfm.kinstacdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/resultsanddata2007.pdf. 2007. Accessed June 1, 2020.

14.

National Resident Matching Program. Results and data: 2008 main residency match ®. https://mk0nrmp3oyqui6wqfm.kinstacdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/resultsanddata2008.pdf. 2008. Accessed June 1, 2020.

15.

National Resident Matching Program. Results and data: 2009 main residency match ®. https://mk0nrmp3oyqui6wqfm.kinstacdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/resultsanddata2009.pdf. 2009. Accessed June 1, 2020.

16.

National Resident Matching Program. Results and data: 2010 main residency match ®. https://mk0nrmp3oyqui6wqfm.kinstacdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/resultsanddata2010.pdf. 2010. Accessed June 1, 2020.

17.

National Resident Matching Program. Results and data: 2011 main residency match ®. https://mk0nrmp3oyqui6wqfm.kinstacdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/resultsanddata2011.pdf. 2011. Accessed June 1, 2020.

18.

National Resident Matching Program. Results and data: 2012 main residency match ®. https://mk0nrmp3oyqui6wqfm.kinstacdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/resultsanddata20121.pdf. 2012. Accessed June 1, 2020.

19.

National Resident Matching Program. Results and data: 2013 main residency match ®. The Match. https://mk0nrmp3oyqui6wqfm.kinstacdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/resultsanddata2013.pdf. 2013. Accessed June 1, 2020.

20.

National Resident Matching Program. Results and data: 2014 main residency match ®. The Match. https://mk0nrmp3oyqui6wqfm.kinstacdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Main-Match-Results-and-Data-2014.pdf. 2014. Accessed June 1, 2020.

21.

National Resident Matching Program. Results and data: 2015 main residency match ®. The Match. https://mk0nrmp3oyqui6wqfm.kinstacdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Main-Match-Results-and-Data-2015_final.pdf. 2015. Accessed June 1, 2020.

22.

National Resident Matching Program. Results and data: 2016 main residency match ®. The Match. https://mk0nrmp3oyqui6wqfm.kinstacdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Main-Match-Results-and-Data-2016.pdf. 2016. Accessed June 1, 2020.

23.

Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 2007. https://mk0nrmp3oyqui6wqfm.kinstacdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/chartingoutcomes2007.pdf. 2007. Accessed June 1, 2020.

24.

Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 2009. http://www.nrmp.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/chartingoutcomes2009v3.pdf. 2009. Accessed June 1, 2020.

25.

Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 2011. http://www.nrmp.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/chartingoutcomes2011.pdf. 2011. Accessed June 1, 2020.

26.

Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 2014. https://www.nrmp.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Charting-Outcomes-2014-Final.pdf. 2014. Accessed June 1, 2020.

27.

Charting Outcomes in the Match for U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 2016. https://www.nrmp.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Charting-Outcomes-US-Allopathic-Seniors-2016.pdf. 2016:138. Accessed June 1, 2020.

28.

Charting Outcomes in the Match: U.S. Allopathic Seniors, 2018. https://www.nrmp.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Charting-Outcomes-in-the-Match-2018-Seniors.pdf. 2018. Accessed June 1, 2020.

29.

Whipple

Law

Bly

. A computer simulation model to analyze the application process for competitive residency programs. J Grad Med Educ. 2019;11(1):30-35. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-18-00397.1

30.

Salehi

Azizzadeh

Lee

YH.

Preference signaling for competitive residency programs in the NRMP. J Grad Med Educ. 12 2019;11(6):733-734. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-19-00695.1

31.

Chang

CWD

. Match 2017: blindsided or fumbled? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;158(4):594-597. doi:10.1177/0194599817751890

32.

Kramer

Is the program-specific paragraph responsible for declining application numbers? A commentary. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;158(2):215-216. doi:10.1177/0194599817751053

33.

Salehi

Michaelides

Preference signaling in the national resident matching program-reply. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;144(10):951-952. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2018.1559

34.

Bowe

Schmalbach

Laury

AM.

The state of the otolaryngology match: A review of applicant trends, “impossible” qualifications, and implications. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;156(6):985-990. doi:10.1177/0194599817695804

35.

Bowe

Schmalbach

Laury

AM.

Regarding “is the program-specific paragraph responsible for declining application numbers? A commentary”. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;158(6):1150-1151. doi:10.1177/0194599818771912

36.

Chang

CW.

Gift horse. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;140(7):677-678. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2014.939

37.

Chang

Erhardt

BF.

Rising residency applications: How high will it go?

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;153(5): 702-705. doi:10.1177/0194599815597216

38.

Naclerio

Pinto

Baroody

FM.

Drowning in applications for residency training: a program’s perspective and simple solutions. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014; 140(8):695-696. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2014.1127

39.

Stepan

Kaul

Raquib

, et al. An evaluation of the program-specific paragraph in the otolaryngology residency application. Laryngoscope. 2018;128(11):2508-2513. doi:10.1002/lary.27553

40.

Naples

Canfarotta

Tabtabai

Sparks

Parham

Falcone

Otolaryngology interest groups: a potential solution to the residency match crisis. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2019;4(1):24-29. doi:10.1002/lio2.234

41.

Ward

Pingree

Laury

Bowe

SN.

Applicant perspectives on the otolaryngology residency application process. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;143(8):782-787. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2017.0231

42.

Chang

CWD

Gray

Malekzadeh

, et al. Cultivating and recruiting future otolaryngology residents: shaping the tributary. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;160(1):8-10. doi:10.1177/0194599818797091

43.

Bowe

Laury

Gray

ST.

Associations between Otolaryngology Applicant Characteristics and Future Performance in Residency or Practice: A Systematic Review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Jun 2017;156(6):1011-1017. doi:10.1177/0194599817698430

44.

Villwock

Hamill

Sale

Sykes

KJ.

Beyond the USMLE: the STAR algorithm for initial residency applicant screening and interview selection. J Surg Res. 2019;235:447-452. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2018.07.057

45.

Mansi

Karam

Chaaban

MR.

Attitudes of residents and program directors towards research in otolaryngology residency. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2019;128(1):28-35. doi:10.1177/0003489418804565

46.

Rinard

Mahabir

RC.

Successfully matching into surgical specialties: an analysis of national resident matching program data. J Grad Med Educ. 2010;2(3):316-321. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-09-00020.1

47.

Kaplan

Riedy

Grundfast

KM.

Increasing competitiveness for an otolaryngology residency: where we are and concerns about the future. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;153(5):699-701. doi:10.1177/0194599815593734

48.

U.S. Medical School Enrollment Surpasses Expansion Goal Association of American Medical Colleges. https://www.aamc.org/news-insights/press-releases/us-medical-school-enrollment-surpasses-expansion-goal. 2019. Accessed June 1, 2020.

49.

Kay-Rivest

Varma

Scott

, et al. Securing an OTL-HNS residency: how competitive is it? Comparing medical student perceptions to actual Canadian statistics. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;46(1):16. doi:10.1186/s40463-017-0192-4

50.

Wang

Pillutla

Tello

, et al. Competitiveness of otolaryngology residency applicants without a home program. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2020;129(5):462-468. doi:10.1177/0003489419892016

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.08 MB

Otolaryngology Applicant Characteristics and Trends: Comparing OTO-HNS with Peer Specialties

Abstract

Purpose:

Materials and Methods:

Results:

Conclusions:

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material