Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective:

To determine the impact coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) will have on the 2020-2021 otolaryngology (OTO-HNS) resident application cycle.

Methods:

A cross-sectional survey targeting OTO-HNS program directors (PD) was created and disseminated via email to PDs on May 28th 2020. Descriptive analyses of the 19-question survey was performed, and free text responses for certain suitable questions were thematically categorized into groups determined to be relevant during analysis.

Results:

Twenty-nine of 123 solicited PDs (23.6%) completed the survey. Nineteen (65.5%) respondents indicated they would not host away rotations (AR) in 2020, and 9 (31.0%) reported that they would consider away rotators without home programs. Regarding the historical importance of AR, 21 (72.4%) PDs stated they were either “extremely” or “very” important in evaluating candidates. Sixteen (55.2%) PDs stated that virtual interviews would impact their ability to properly gauge candidates and 12 (41.4%) were unsure. Eight PDs (27.6%) stated their evaluation of candidates will likely change, with a shift toward an increased reliance on letters of recommendation, research involvement, and clerkship grades. The large majority of PDs—25 (86.2%)—were not worried that the COVID-19 pandemic would affect the abilities of new interns beginning in 2021.

Conclusion:

Virtual interviews and engagement activities will mostly supplant sub-Is and AR for the 2020-2021 OTO-HNS application cycle. Surveyed PDs largely believe these will be insufficient in providing a comprehensive assessment of candidates, and will similarly limit applicants’ ability to gauge residency programs. Criteria utilized to evaluate students is expected to change.

Keywords

medical student education Program Directors Survey otolaryngology applications COVID-19 virtual interviews

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

National Resident Matching Program. Results and Data: 2020 Main Residency Match^®. 2020. https://mk0nrmp3oyqui6wqfm.kinstacdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/MM_Results_and-Data_2020.pdf.

Kaplan

Riedy

Grundfast

KM.

Increasing competitiveness for an otolaryngology residency: where we are and concerns about the future. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;153(5):699-701.

Kramer

Is the program-specific paragraph responsible for declining application numbers? A commentary. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;158(2):215-216.

Thangamathesvaran

Patel

Siddiqui

, et al. The otolaryngology match: a bibliometric analysis of 222 first-year residents. Laryngoscope. 2019;129(7):1561-1566.

Bowe

Schmalbach

Laury

AM.

The state of the otolaryngology match: a review of applicant trends, “Impossible” qualifications, and implications. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;156(6):985-990.

Schmalbach

CE.

2017: the year otolaryngology had to “scramble”. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;156(6):975.

Stepan

Kaul

Raquib

, et al. An evaluation of the program-specific paragraph in the otolaryngology residency application. Laryngoscope. 2018;128:2508-2513.

Lee

Young

Liao

Reh

Best

SR.

I dream of Gini: quantifying inequality in otolaryngology residency interviews. Laryngoscope. 2019;129(3):627-633.

Chang

Erhardt

BF.

Rising residency applications: how high will it go?

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;153:702-705.

10.

Givi

Schiff

Chinn

, et al. Safety recommendations for evaluation and surgery of the head and neck during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;146(6):579-584.

11.

Kasle

Torabi

Savoca

, et al. Outpatient otolaryngology in the era of COVID-19: a data-driven analysis of practice patterns. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;163(1):138-144.

12.

Final Report and Recommendations for Medical Education Institutions of LCME-Accredited, U.S. Osteopathic, and Non-U.S. Medical School Applicants. Available at: https://www.aamc.org/system/files/2020-05/covid19_Final_Recommendations_Executive%20Summary_Final_05112020.pdf. May 2020.

13.

SUO/AADO/OPDO. SUO/AADO/OPDO Statement regarding Away Rotations. 2020. https://cdn.ymaws.com/suo-aado.org/resource/resmgr/covid-19/suo-aado-opdo_away_rotation_.pdf

14.

Wang

Pillutla

Tello

, et al. Competitiveness of otolaryngology residency applicants without a home program. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2020;129(5):462-468.

15.

Farlow

Marchiano

Fischer

Moyer

Thorne

Bohm

. Addressing the impact of COVID-19 on the residency application process through a virtual subinternship [Published online ahead of print June 09, 2020]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. doi: 10.1177/0194599820934775.

16.

Salehi

Benito

Michaelides

A novel approach to the National Resident Matching Program-The Star System. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;144(5):397-398.

17.

Salehi

Michaelides

Preference Signaling in the National Resident Matching Program-Reply. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;144(10):951-952.

18.

Mansi

Karam

Chaaban

MR.

Attitudes of residents and program directors towards research in otolaryngology residency. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2019;128(1):28-35.

19.

Boyd

Inglesby

Corey

, et al. Impact of COVID-19 on away rotations in surgical fields. J Surg Res. 2020;255:96-98.

20.

Quesada

Solis

Diaz

, et al. Otolaryngology residency application during the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;163(1):89-90.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.08 MB