In Reference to Reflux Sign Assessment: Statistical Issue on Reliability to Avoid Misinterpretation

Sabour S. Reflux sign assessment; statistical issue on reliability to avoid misinterpretation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003489420931892.

Lechien JR Rodriguez Ruiz A Dequanter D , et al. Validity and reliability of the reflux sign assessment. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2020;129(4):313-325.

Riffenburgh RH . Chapter 15 - managing results of analysis. In: Riffenburgh RH (ed.) Statistics in Medicine. 3rd ed. Academic Press; 2012:325-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-384864-2.00015-9.Statistique Théorique et Appliquée. 3e Edition, De Boeck, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium. 2011.

Belafsky PC Postma GN Koufman JA. The validity and reliability of the reflux finding score (RFS). Laryngoscope. 2001;111(8):1313-1317.

Beaver ME Stasney CR Weitzel E , et al. Diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease with digital imaging. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;128(1):103-108.

Francis DO McPheeters ML Noud M Penson DF Feurer ID. Checklist to operationalize measurement characteristics of patient-reported outcome measures. Syst Rev. 2016;5(1):129.

Vakil NB Halling K Becher A Ryden A. Systematic review of patient-reported outcome instruments for gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;25(1):2-14.

Lechien JR Schindler A De Marrez LG , et al. Instruments evaluating the clinical findings of laryngopharyngeal reflux: a systematic review. Laryngoscope. 2019;129(3):720-736.