Gender disparities in speech-evoked auditory brainstem response (speech-ABR) outcomes have been reported, but the literature is limited. The present study was performed to further verify this issue and determine the influence of head size on speech-ABR results between genders.
Methods:
Twenty-nine healthy Malaysian subjects (14 males and 15 females) aged 19 to 30 years participated in this study. After measuring the head circumference, speech-ABR was recorded by using synthesized syllable /da/ from the right ear of each participant. Speech-ABR peaks amplitudes, peaks latencies, and composite onset measures were computed and analyzed.
Results:
Significant gender disparities were noted in the transient component but not in the sustained component of speech-ABR. Statistically higher V/A amplitudes and less steeper V/A slopes were found in females. These gender differences were partially affected after controlling for the head size.
Conclusions:
Head size is not the main contributing factor for gender disparities in speech-ABR outcomes. Gender-specific normative data can be useful when recording speech-ABR for clinical purposes.
SkoeEKrausN.Auditory brain stem response to complex sounds: a tutorial. Ear Hear. 2010;31:1-23.
2.
GalbraithGCArbageyPWBranskiRComerciNRectorPM.Intelligible speech encoded in the human brainstem frequency-following response. Neuroreport. 1995;6:2363-2367.
3.
MaddiesonI.Patterns of Sounds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1984.
4.
HornikelJSkoeEKrausN.Subcortical laterality of speech encoding. Audiol Neurotol. 2008;14:198-207.
5.
AhadiMPourbakhtAJafariAHJalaieS.Effects of stimulus presentation mode and subcortical laterality in speech-evoked auditory brainstem responses. Int J Audiol. 2014;53:243-249.
6.
MusacchiaGSamsMNicolTKrausN.Seeing speech affects acoustic information processing in the human brainstem. Exp Brain Res. 2006;168:1-10.
7.
MusacchiaGSamsMSkoeEKrausN.Musicians have enhanced subcortical auditory and audiovisual processing of speech and music. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:15894-15898.
8.
FilippiniRBefi-LopesDMSchochatE.Efficacy of auditory training using the auditory brainstem response to complex sounds: auditory processing disorder and specific language impairment. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2012;64:217-226.
9.
KrishnamurtiSForresterJRutledgeCHolmesGW.A case study of the changes in the speech-evoked auditory brainstem response associated with auditory training in children with auditory processing disorders. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;77:594-604.
10.
CunninghamJNicolTZekerSGBradlowAKrausN.Neurobiologic responses to speech in noise in children with learning problems: deficits and strategies for improvement. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001;112:758-767.
11.
RussoNNicolTTrommerBZeckerSKrausN.Brainstem transcription of speech is disrupted in children with autism spectrum disorders. Dev Sci. 2009;12:557-567.
12.
BanaiKHornickelJSkoeENicolTZeckerSKrausN.Reading and subcortical auditory function. Cereb Cortex. 2009;19:2699-2707.
13.
JafariZMalayeriSRostamiR.Subcortical encoding of speech cues in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015;126:325-332.
14.
JergerJHallJ.Effects of age and sex on auditory brainstem response. Arch Otolarynngol. 1980;106:387-391.
15.
BurkardRFEggermontJJDonM.Auditory Evoked Potentials: Basic Principles and Application. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.
16.
HallJ.New Handbook of Auditory Evoked Responses. Boston: Pearson; 2007.
17.
KrizmanJSkoeEKrausN.Sex differences in auditory subcortical function. Clin Neurophysiol. 2012;123:590-597.
18.
AhadiMPourbakhtAJafariAHShirjianZJafarpishehAS.Gender disparity in subcortical encoding of binaurally presented speech stimuli: an auditory evoked potentials study. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2014;41:239-243.
19.
ContiGModicaVCastrataroAFileniAColosimoC.Latency of the auditory brainstem response and head size. Evidence of the relationship by means of radiographic data. Scand Audiol Suppl. 1988;30:219-223.
20.
AoyagiMKimYYokoyamaJKirenTSuzukiYKoikeY.Head size as a basis of gender difference in the latency of the brainstem auditory-evoked response. Audiology. 1990;29:107-112.
21.
KimmelSRRatliff-SchaubK. Growth and development. In: RakelRERakelDP, eds. Textbook of Family Medicine, 8th ed.Philadelphia: Saunders; 2011:421-441.
22.
TruneDRMitchellCPhillipsDS.The relative importance of head size, gender and age on the auditory brainstem response. Hear Res. 1998;32:165-174.
23.
DonMPontonCWEggermontJJMasudaA.Gender differences in cochlear response time: an explanation for gender amplitude differences in the unmasked auditory brainstem response. J Acoust Soc Am. 1993;94:2135-2148.
24.
TremereLAJeongJKPinaudR.Estradiol shapes auditory processing in the adult brain by regulating inhibitory transmission and plasticity-associated gene expression. J Neurosci. 2009;29:5949-5963.
25.
TremereLAPinaudR.Brain-generated estradiol drives long-term optimization of auditory coding to enhance the discrimination signals. J Neurosci. 2011;31:3271-3289.
26.
HultcrantzMSimonoskaRStenbergA.E.Estrogen and hearing: a summary of recent investigations. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh). 2006;126:10-14.
27.
WhartonJAChurchGT.Influence of menopause on the auditory brainstem response. Int J Audiol. 1990;29:196-201.
28.
HederstiernaCHultcrantzMRosenhallU.Estrogen and hearing from a clinical point of view; characteristics of auditory function in women with Turner syndrome. Hear Res. 2009;252:3-8.
29.
HoormannJFalkensteinMHohnsbeinJBlankeL.The human frequency following response (FFR): normal variability and relation to the click-evoked brainstem response. Hear Res. 1992;59:179-188.
30.
KouniSNGiannopoulosSZiavraNKoutsojannisC.Brainstem auditory evoked potentials with the use of acoustic clicks and complex verbal sounds in young adults with learning disabilities. Am J Otolaryngol. 2013;34:646-651.
31.
McCannBSRoy-ByrneP.Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and learning disabilities in adults. Semin Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2000;5:191-197.
32.
BellisTJBellisJD.Central auditory processing disorders in children and adults. Handb Clin Neurol. 2015;129:537-556.
33.
TallalPStarkRE.Speech acoustic-cue discrimination abilities of normally developing and language-impaired children. J Acoust Soc Am. 1981;69:568-574.
34.
de GelderBVroomenJ. Impaired speech perception in poor readers: evidence from hearing and speech reading. Brain Lang. 1998;64:269-281.
