We present 2 patients who were identified with mutations in the GPR98 gene that causes Usher syndrome type 2 (USH2).
Methods:
One hundred ninety-four (194) Japanese subjects from unrelated families were enrolled in the study. Targeted genomic enrichment and massively parallel sequencing of all known nonsyndromic hearing loss genes were used to identify the genetic causes of hearing loss.
Results:
We identified causative mutations in the GPR98 gene in 1 family (2 siblings). The patients had moderate sloping hearing loss, and no progression was observed over a period of 10 years. Fundus examinations were normal. However, electroretinograms revealed impaired responses in both patients.
Conclusion:
Early diagnosis of Usher syndrome has many advantages for patients and their families. This study supports the use of comprehensive genetic diagnosis for Usher syndrome, especially prior to the onset of visual symptoms, to provide the highest chance of diagnostic success in early life stages.
KimberlingWJHildebrandMSShearerAE, et al. Frequency of Usher syndrome in two pediatric populations: implications for genetic screening of deaf and hard of hearing children. Genet Med. 2010;12(8):512-516.
2.
YanDLiuXZ. Genetics and pathological mechanisms of Usher syndrome. J Hum Genet. 2010;55(6):327-335.
3.
YoshimuraHIwasakiSKandaY, et al. An Usher syndrome type 1 patient diagnosed before the appearance of visual symptoms by MYO7A mutation analysis. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;77(2):298-302.
MiyagawaMNaitoTNishioSYKamataniNUsamiS. Targeted exon sequencing successfully discovers rare causative genes and clarifies the molecular epidemiology of Japanese deafness patients. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e71381.
6.
ShearerAEBlack-ZiegelbeinEAHildebrandMS, et al. Advancing genetic testing for deafness with genomic technology. J Med Genet. 2013;50(9):627-634.
7.
ShearerAEHildebrandMSSmithRJ. Solution-based targeted genomic enrichment for precious DNA samples. BMC Biotechnol. 2012;12(1):20.
8.
LiHDurbinR. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(14):1754-1760.
9.
McKennaAHannaMBanksE, et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010;20(9):1297-1303.
10.
FrommoltPAbdallahATAltmullerJ, et al. Assessing the enrichment performance in targeted resequencing experiments. Hum Mutat. 2012;33(4):635-641.
11.
WestonMDLuijendijkMWHumphreyKDMollerCKimberlingWJ. Mutations in the VLGR1 gene implicate G-protein signaling in the pathogenesis of Usher syndrome type II. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;74(2):357-366.
12.
JacobsonSGCideciyanAVAlemanTS, et al. Usher syndromes due to MYO7A, PCDH15, USH2A or GPR98 mutations share retinal disease mechanism. Hum Mol Genet. 2008;17(15):2405-2415.
13.
HilgertNKahriziKDieltjensN, et al. A large deletion in GPR98 causes type IIC Usher syndrome in male and female members of an Iranian family. J Med Genet. 2009;46(4):272-276.
14.
BesnardTVacheCBauxD, et al. Non-USH2A mutations in USH2 patients. Hum Mutat. 2012;33(3):504-510.
15.
MichalskiNMichelVBahloulA, et al. Molecular characterization of the ankle-link complex in cochlear hair cells and its role in the hair bundle functioning. J Neurosci. 2007;27(24):6478-6488.
16.
McGeeJGoodyearRJMcMillanDR, et al. The very large G-protein-coupled receptor VLGR1: a component of the ankle link complex required for the normal development of auditory hair bundles. J Neurosci. 2006;26(24):6543-6553.
17.
BonnetCGratiMMarlinS, et al. Complete exon sequencing of all known Usher syndrome genes greatly improves molecular diagnosis. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2011;6:21.
18.
Le Quesne StabejPSaihanZRangeshN, et al. Comprehensive sequence analysis of nine Usher syndrome genes in the UK National Collaborative Usher Study. J Med Genet. 2012;49(1):27-36.
19.
Garcia-GarciaGBesnardTBauxD, et al. The contribution of GPR98 and DFNB31 genes to a Spanish Usher syndrome type 2 cohort. Mol Vis. 2013;19:367-373.
NakanishiHOhtsuboMIwasakiS, et al. Identification of 11 novel mutations in USH2A among Japanese patients with Usher syndrome type 2. Clin Genet. 2009;76(4):383-391.
22.
AbadieCBlanchetCBauxD, et al. Audiological findings in 100 USH2 patients. Clin Genet. 2012;82(5):433-438.
23.
TsilouETRubinBICarusoRC, et al. Usher syndrome clinical types I and II: could ocular symptoms and signs differentiate between the two types?Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2002;80(2):196-201.
24.
LiuXZAngeliSIRajputK, et al. Cochlear implantation in individuals with Usher type 1 syndrome. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;72(6):841-847.
