Effects of Early Identification and Intervention on Language Development in Japanese Children with Prelingual Severe to Profound Hearing Impairment

Abstract

Objectives:

Early identification and intervention for prelingual bilateral severe to profound hearing loss is supposed to reduce the delay in language development. Many countries have implemented early detection and hearing intervention and conducted regional universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS). However, the benefits of UNHS in later childhood have not yet been confirmed, although language development at school age has a lifelong impact on children's future. Our Research on Sensory and Communicative Disorders project attempted to reveal the effects of UNHS and those of early intervention on the development of verbal communication in Japanese children.

Methods:

In this study, 319 children with prelingual bilateral severe to profound hearing loss, 4 to 10 years of age, were evaluated with the Test of Question-Answer Interaction Development used as an objective variable. Participation in UNHS and early intervention were used as explanatory variables. The adjusted odds ratio (AOR) was calculated after adjusting several confounding factors with use of logistic regression analysis. In addition, caregivers' answers were obtained by a questionnaire, and the process of diagnosis with and without UNHS was analyzed retrospectively.

Results:

Early intervention was significantly associated with better language development (AOR, 3.23; p < 0.01). Participation in UNHS may contribute to better language development to some extent (AOR, 1.32), but not one that was statistically significant (p = 0.37). However, UNHS was significantly associated with early intervention (AOR, 20.21; p < 0.001). The questionnaire results indicated a lag in treatment after UNHS in more than 40% of screened cases.

Conclusions:

Early intervention strongly influenced language development. It is necessary to ensure that early identification leads directly to early intervention.

Keywords

early identification early intervention hearing loss language development newborn hearing screening

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Fukushima

Mimaki

Fukuda

Nishizaki

. Pilot study of universal newborn hearing screening in Japan: District-based screening program in Okayama. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2008;117:166–71.

Yoshinaga-Itano

. Benefits of early intervention for children with hearing loss. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1999;32:1089–102.

Yoshinaga-Itano

Coulter

Thomson

. The Colorado Newborn Hearing Screening Project: Effects on speech and language development for children with hearing loss. J Perinatol 2000;20:S132–S137.

Yoshinaga-Itano

Coulter

Thomson

. Developmental outcomes of children with hearing loss born in Colorado hospitals with and without universal newborn hearing screening programs. Semin Neonatol 2001;6:521–9.

Fukuda

Fukushima

Toida

. Monosyllable speech perception of Japanese hearing aid users with prelingual hearing loss: Implications for surgical indication of cochlear implant. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2003;67:1061–7.

Yoshinaga-Itano

Baca

Sedey

. Describing the trajectory of language development in the presence of severe-to-profound hearing loss: A closer look at children with cochlear implants versus hearing aids. Otol Neurotol 2010;31:1268–74.

Fukuda

Fukushima

Maeda

. Language development of a multiply handicapped child after cochlear implantation. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2003;67:627–33.

Fukushima

Sugata

Kasai

. Better speech performance in cochlear implant patients with GJB2-related deafness. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2002;62:151–7.

Pressman

Pipp-Siegel

Yoshinaga-Itano

Deas

. Maternal sensitivity predicts language gain in preschool children who are deaf and hard of hearing. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 1999;4:294–304.

10.

Moeller

. Early intervention and language development in children who are deaf and hard of hearing. Pediatrics 2000;106:E43.

11.

Raven

. Guide to using the Coloured Progressive Matrices Sets A, Ab, B. London, England: Lewis, 1965.

12.

Uno

Haruhara

Kaneko

. Reading/writing screening test for school aged children: An approach to detect developmental dyslexia [in Japanese]. Tokyo, Japan: Interuna Publishers, 2006.

13.

Uno

Wydell

Haruhara

Kaneko

Shinya

. Relationship between reading/writing skills and cognitive abilities among Japanese primary-school children: Normal readers versus poor readers (dyslexics). Reading Writing 2009;22:755–89.

14.

Satake

Higashie

Chinen

. Manual for Test of Query-Answering Relationship [in Japanese]. Tokyo, Japan: Escor Co, 1996.

15.

Toyama

Hisano

Chinen

Satake

. Test of Query-Answering Relationship. Vol 1. Scope and data from normally developed children [in Japanese]. Jpn J Logoped Phoniatr 1994;35:338–48.

16.

http://benesse.jp/berd/center/open/report/kosodate/2007/hon/index.html. Benesse Educational Research and Development Center. 3rd Survey on Child Care [in Japanese]. 2008:34–51. Accessed April 27, 2011.

17.

Kamio

Yukihiro

Adachi

. Reliability and validity of the Pervasive Developmental Disorder (PDD)–Autism Society Japan Rating Scale (PARS): A behavior checklist for adolescents and adults with PDDs [in Japanese]. Clin Psychiatry (Seishin-Igaku) 2006;48:495–505.

18.

American Academy of Pediatrics, Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. Year 2007 position statement: Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Pediatrics 2007;120:898–921.

19.

Yoshinaga-Itano

Sedey

Coulter

Mehl

. Language of early- and later-identified children with hearing loss. Pediatrics 1998;102:1161–71.

20.

Watkin

Baldwin

. Identifying deafness in early childhood: Requirements after the newborn hearing screen. Arch Dis Child 2011;96:62–6.

21.

Fitzpatrick

Durieux-Smith

Eriks-Brophy

Olds

Gaines

. The impact of newborn hearing screening on communication development. J Med Screen 2007;14:123–31.

22.

Wolff

Hommerich

Riemsma

Antes

Lange

Kleijnen

. Hearing screening in newborns: Systematic review of accuracy, effectiveness, and effects of interventions after screening. Arch Dis Child 2010;95:130–5.