Virtual versus Conventional Laryngeal Endoscopy

Abstract

We have evaluated the capacity of virtual laryngoscopy and conventional laryngoscopy conducted with a rigid or flexible instrument to visualize laryngeal structures in 64 patients with normal endoluminal anatomy. Virtual laryngoscopy allowed total visualization of laryngeal structures, including those that could not be reached by a flexible instrument. There was good correlation between virtual laryngoscopy and “real” images, indicating satisfactory diagnostic accuracy (p > .05). Although virtual laryngoscopy does not provide histologic data, it is a fast and noninvasive technique that can be added to and integrated with conventional laryngoscopy, and it can be an alternative in cases in which conventional laryngoscopy is difficult, contraindicated, or impossible. It is particularly useful for the study of laryngeal narrow spaces and in the visualization of subglottic regions and of other more restricted areas (inferior tonsil region, posterior surface of the epiglottis, glossoepiglottic vallecula, Morgagni's ventricle, anterior commissure).