We tested the hypothesis that vocal fold paresis leads to a substantial reduction in activity from the internal branch of the superior laryngeal nerve (iSLN) during respiration and evoked vocalization. The iSLN afferent activity was measured before and after recurrent laryngeal nerve paresis by cold block in decerebrate cats during spontaneous respiration and electrically evoked vocalization. Response rate patterns of 33 iSLN single units from 11 cats were categorized into 5 groups based on responses to vocalization. Only 24% of single units during spontaneous respiration and 18% during evoked phonation displayed activity pattern changes as a result of paresis. Those fibers affected were heterogeneous in discharge pattern, but none of the units that followed voice frequency lost this characteristic when the motor nerve was cooled. The relative insensitivity of iSLN activity to motor paralysis suggests that the receptors studied are coupled to tissue such that passive interaction rather than active muscular contraction is the major stimulus.
NettervilleJLStoneRELukenESCivantosFJOssoffRH. Silastic medialization and arytenoid adduction: the Vanderbilt experience. A review of 116 phonosurgical procedures. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol1993;102: 413–24.
2.
BousheyHARichardsonPSWiddicombeJGWiseJCM.The response of laryngeal afferent fibres to mechanical and chemical stimuli. J Physiol (Lond)1974;240: 153–75.
3.
SampsonSEyzaguirreC.Some functional characteristics of mechanoreceptors in the larynx of the cat. J Neurophysiol1964;27: 464–80.
4.
Sant'AmbrogioGMathewOPFisherJTSant'AmbrogioFB. Laryngeal receptors responding to transmural pressure, airflow and local muscle activity. Respir Physiol1983;54: 317–30.
5.
WiddicombeJ.Reflexes from the upper respiratory tract. In: ChernaikNWiddicombeJ, eds. Handbook of physiology; section 3. The respiratory system; vol 2. Control of breathing; part 1. Washington, DC: The American Physiological Society, 1986: 363–94.
6.
MathewOPFarberJP. Effect of upper airway negative pressure on respiratory timing. Respir Physiol1983;54: 259–68.
7.
Sant'AmbrogioGTsuboneHSant'AmbrogioFB. Sensory information from the upper airway: role in the control of breathing. Respir Physiol1995;102: 1–16.
8.
KirchnerJASuzukiM.Laryngeal reflexes and voice production. Ann N Y Acad Sci1968;155: 98–109.
9.
ClarkKFFarberJP. Characterization of laryngeal receptors activated during phonation [Abstract]. Assoc Res Otolaryngol Abstracts1993;16:64.
10.
MiuraTSakamotoTShibaKNakajimaY.Activities of the laryngeal afferent discharges during electrically induced vocalization in cats [Abstract]. Jpn J Physiol1994;44(suppl):S115.
11.
MathewOP. Upper airway negative-pressure effects on respiratory activity of upper airway muscles. J Appl Physiol Respirat Environ Exercise Physiol1984;56: 500–5.
12.
MathewOPAbu-OsbaYKThachBT. Influence of upper airway pressure changes on respiratory frequency. Respir Physiol1982;49: 223–33.
13.
MathewOPSant'AmbrogioFBSant'AmbrogioG.Effects of cooling on laryngeal reflexes in dogs. Respir Physiol1986;66: 61–70.
DavisPJNailBS. Quantitative analysis of laryngeal mechanosensitivity in the cat and rabbit. J Physiol (Lond)1987;388: 467–85.
18.
StoreyAT. A functional analysis of sensory units innervating epiglottis and larynx. Exp Neurol1968;20: 366–83.
19.
TrappTKBerkeGSBellTSHansonDGWardPH. Effect of vocal fold augmentation on laryngeal vibration in simulated recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis: a study of Teflon and Phonogel. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol1989;98: 220–7.
20.
StoreyAT. A functional analysis of laryngeal and pharyngeal sensory units in the cat [Abstract]. Physiologist1962;5:218.
21.
TestermanRL. Modulation of laryngeal activity by pulmonary changes during vocalization in cats. Exp Neurol1970; 29: 281–97.
22.
GrachevaMS. Sensory innervation of locomotor apparatus of the larynx. Arch Anat Gistol Embriol1963;44:77.
23.
YoshidaYTanakaYMitsumasuTHiranoMKanasekiT.Peripheral course and intramucosal distribution of the laryngeal sensory nerve fibers of cats. Brain Res Bull1986;17: 95–105.
24.
BianconiRMolinariG.Electroneurographic evidence of muscle spindles and other sensory endings in the intrinsic laryngeal muscles of the cat. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1962;55: 253–9.
25.
WykeB.Reflexogenic contributions to vocal fold control systems. In: TitzeIRSchererRC, eds. Vocal fold physiology: biomechanics, acoustics and phonatory control. Denver, Colo: The Denver Center for the Performing Arts, 1985: 138–40.
26.
DavisPJZhangSPBandlerR.Pulmonary and upper airway afferent influences on the motor pattern of vocalization evoked by excitation of the midbrain periaqueductal gray of the cat. Brain Res1993;607: 61–80.
27.
GarrettJDLuscheiES. Subglottic pressure modulation during evoked phonation in the anesthetized cat. In: BaerTCSasakiCHarrisKS, eds. Laryngeal function in phonation and respiration.Boston, Mass: College-Hill, 1987: 139–53.
