Rehabilitation after laryngectomy includes more and more the use of airflow-regulating devices such as shunt valves (SVs), tracheostoma valves (TSVs), and heat and moisture exchange (HME) filters. In determining the quality of those devices, airflow resistance is a very important factor. It is currently defined as pressure drop divided by airflow. However, for most applications, this definition does not result in a pressure- and airflow-independent parameter. Therefore, a new set of parameters is defined and applied to pressure-airflow curves of airflow-regulating devices. Pressure drop over TSVs and HME filters appears to have a squared relationship with flow. In SVs, it has a linear relationship. The new set of parameters describes the pressure-airflow relationship properly for all considered devices. In conclusion, theoretical predictions of flow mechanics appear to be valid for SVs, TSVs, and HME filters. Only 2 coefficients are necessary to describe the pressure-flow characteristics of these airflow-regulating devices, independent of pressure drop over and flow through the device.
MahieuHF. Laryngectomee voice rehabilitation using the Groningen button voice prosthesis. Rev Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Bord)1987; 108: 113–9.
2.
HilgersFJCornelissenMWBalmAJ. Aerodynamic characteristics of the Provox low-resistance indwelling voice prosthesis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol1993; 250: 375–8.
3.
van Lith-BijlJTMahieuHFPatelPZijlstraRJ. Clinical experience with the low-resistance Groningen button. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol1992; 249: 354–7.
4.
BusscherHJGeertsema-DoornbuschGIvan der MeiHC. Adhesion to silicone rubber of yeasts and bacteria isolated from voice prostheses: Influence of salivary conditioning films. J Biomed Mater Res1997; 34: 201–9.
5.
ZijlstraRJMahieuHFvan Lith-BijlJTSchutteHK. Aerodynamic properties of the low-resistance Groningen button. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1991; 117: 657–61.
6.
GeertsemaAAde VriesMPSchutteHKLubbersJVerkerkeGJ. In vitro measurements of aerodynamic characteristics of an improved tracheostoma valve for laryngectomees. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol1998; 255: 244–9.
7.
GeertsemaAABoonstraCWSchutteHKVerkerkeGJ. Design and test of a new tracheostoma valve based on inhalation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1999; 125: 622–6.
8.
GrolmanWSchouwenburgPFde BoerMFKnegtPPSpoelstraHAMeeuwisCA. First results with the Blom-Singer adjustable tracheostoma valve. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec1995; 57: 165–70.
9.
HerrmannIFKossW. Experience with the ESKA-Herr-mann tracheostoma valve. In: HerrmannIFSpeech restoration via voice prostheses. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 1986: 184–6.
10.
van den HoogenFJAMeeuwisCOudesMJJanssenPManniJJ. The Blom-Singer tracheostoma valve as a valuable addition in the rehabilitation of the laryngectomized patient. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol1996; 253: 126–9.
11.
VerkerkeGJVeenstraASchutteHKHerrmannIFRakhorstG. Design and test of a hands-free tracheostoma valve to improve the rehabilitation process after laryngectomy. Int J Artif Organs1994; 17: 175–82.
12.
BalleVHRindsoLThomsenJ. Speech rehabilitation by Provox voice prosthesis combined with heat and moisture exchange filters. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl (Stockh)1997(suppl 529): 251–3.
13.
HilgersFJAaronsonNKAckerstaffAHSchouwenburgPFvan ZandwijkN. The influence of a heat and moisture exchanger (HME) on the respiratory symptoms after total laryngectomy. Clin Otolaryngol1991; 16: 152–6.
van den HoogenFJAVeenstraAVerkerkeGJSchutteHKManniJJ. In vivo aerodynamic characteristics of the Nijdam voice prosthesis. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh)1997; 117: 897–902.
16.
VeenstraAvan den HoogenFJASchutteHKNijdamHFManniJJVerkerkeGJ. Aerodynamic characteristics of the Nijdam voice prosthesis in relation to tracheo-esophageal wall thickness. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol1997; 254: 1–5.
17.
VerkerkeGJde VriesMPSchutteHKvan den HoogenFJRakhorstG. Analysis of the mechanical behavior of the Nijdam voice prosthesis. Laryngoscope1997; 107: 1656–60.
18.
WeinbergBMoonJ. Aerodynamic properties of four tracheoesophageal puncture prostheses. Arch Otolaryngol1984; 110: 673–5.
19.
ColePSavardPMiljeteigHHaightJSJ. Resistance to respiratory airflow of the extrapulmonary airways. Laryngoscope1993; 103: 447–50.
20.
McRaeRDRJonesASYoungPHamiltonJ. Resistance, humidity and temperature of the tracheal airway. Clin Otolaryngol1995; 20: 355–6.
21.
SmitheranJRHixonTJ. A clinical method for estimating laryngeal airway resistance during vowel production. J Speech Hear Disord1981; 46: 138–46.
22.
GrolmanWVan SteenwijkRPGrolmanESchouwenburgPF. Airflow and pressure characteristics of three different tracheostoma valves. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol1998; 107: 312–8.
23.
VerkerkeGJGeertsemaAASchutteHK. Airflow resistance of HME-filters with and without a tracheostoma valve. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol (in press).
24.
GrolmanWBlomEDBransonRDSchouwenburgPFHamakerRC. An efficiency comparison of four heat and moisture exchangers used in the laryngectomized patient. Laryngoscope1997; 107: 814–20.
25.
GrolmanW. Physical aspects of prosthetic voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy [Dissertation]. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: University of Amsterdam, 1998.
26.
FoxRFMcDonaldAT. Introduction to fluid mechanics. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, 1985.
27.
TimoshenkoSPGereJM. Mechanics of materials. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1973: 7–8.
