FinleyCFWilsonBSWhiteM. Models of neural responsiveness to electrical stimulation. In: MillerJMSpelmanFA, eds. Cochlear implants: model of the electrically stimulated ear. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, 1990: 55–93.
2.
FrijnsJHde SnooSLSchoonhovenR. Potential distributions and neural excitation patterns in a rotationally symmetric model of the electrically stimulated cochlea. Hear Res1995; 87: 170–86.
3.
JollyCNCloptonBMSpelmanFALineaweaverS. Guinea pig auditory nerve response triggered by a high density electrode array. Med Prog Technol1997; 21(suppl): 13–23.
4.
ShepherdRKHatsushikaSClarkGM. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: The effect of electrode position on neural excitation. Hear Res1993; 66: 108–20.
5.
WilsonB. The future of cochlear implants. Br JAudiol1997; 31: 205–25.
6.
AriyasuLGaleyFRHilsingerRJrBylFM. Computer-generated three-dimensional reconstruction of the cochlea. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg1989; 100: 87–91.
7.
KawanoASeldonHLClarkGM. Computer-aided three-dimensional reconstruction in human cochlear maps: Measurement of the lengths of organ of Corti, outer wall, inner wall, and Rosenthal's canal. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol1996; 105: 701–9.
8.
HelmsJMullerJSchonF. Evaluation of performance with the COMBI 40 cochlear implant in adults: A multicentric clinical study. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec1997; 59: 23–35.
9.
PeltonARHodgstonDDuerigT, eds. SMST-94: the proceedings of the International Conference on Shape Memory and Superelastic Technology. SMST, Santa Clara, Calif, 1994: 561–626.
10.
GstöttnerWPlenkHFranzP. Cochlear implant deep electrode insertion: Extent of insertional trauma. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh)1997; 117: 274–7.
