Pericarbon Pericardial Valve Prosthesis: Midterm Results of the Aortic Valve Replacement

Abstract

This clinical study was undertaken to verify the encouraging results of experimental studies regarding a new pericardial bioprosthesis. From May 1989 to November 1993, 204 patients underwent an aortic valve replacement with the Pericarbon® (Sorin Biomedica Cardio S.p.A., Saluggia, Italy) prosthesis. A follow-up was 100% complete and extended to 65 months (total 408 patient-years, average 2.0 ±1.4 years). Mean age at the operation was 75.1 ± 5.5 years and 96% were in NYHA clinical stage III or IV. There were 86 men and 118 women; 73 patients had an isolated aortic valve disease, 131 had a concomitant cardiosurgical procedure (coronary artery bypass grafting in 106 patients).

The operative mortality (30-day mortality) rate was 11.8% (24/204). There were 24 late deaths (5.9 ±1.2% patient-year). The actuarial probability of survival was 68 ±5% at 5 years. Four patients died of valve-related causes (one thromboembolic complica tion, two endocarditis, one anticoagulant-related hemorrhage). Actuarial rate of freedom from valve-related death was 95 ±3% at 5 years. Valve-related morbidity included seven thromboembolic episodes (1.7% patient-year), four anticoagulant-related complications (0.9% patient-year), three endocarditis (0.7% patient-year) and one reoperation (0.2% patient-year). After 5 years freedom from thromboembolic events was 83 ±7%, from anticoagulant-related hemorrhage 96 ±2%, from endocarditis 97 ±2%, and from reop eration 99 ± 1 %.

Echocardiographic study performed in 30 patients showed a paraprosthetic leak in four patients, a central leak in two, and cusp thickening in another three. The clinical data showed that the Pericarbon prosthesis has valve-related morbidity. The echocardio graphic results suggest that the prosthesis can undergo a pathologic process during the first 5 years after implantation. This makes it necessary to continue the follow-up and include the larger number of patients in the echocardiographic investigation.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

lonescu MI , Tandon AP , Mary DA , et al: Heart valve replacement with Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenograft . J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 73:31-42, 1977.

Wheatley DJ , Fisher J. , Reece IJ , et al: Primary tissue failure in pericardial heart valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 94:367-374, 1987.

Masters RG , Pipe AL , Bedard JP , et al: Long-term clinical results with the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenograft. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 101:81-89, 1991.

Gallo I. , Nistal F. , Revuelta JM , et al: Incidence of primary valve failure with the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 90:278-280, 1985.

Valente M. , Laborde F. , Thiene G. , et al: Evaluation of Pericarbon valve prosthesis: In vitro, ultrastructural, and animal studies. J Cardiovasc Surg 4:79-88, 1989.

Thiene G. , Laborde F. , Valente M. , et al: Morphologic survey of a new pericardial valve prosthesis (Pericarbon) : Long-term animal experimental model. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 3:65-74, 1989.

Edmunds LH Jr, Clark RE , Cohn LH , et al: Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations. Ann Thorac Surg 46:257-259, 1988.

Grunkemeier GL , Starr A. : Actuarial analysis of surgical results: Rationale and method. Ann Thorac Surg 24:404-408, 1977.

Walker DK , Scotten LN , Brownlee RT : New generation tissue valves: Their in vitro function in mitral position . J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 88:573-582, 1984.

10.

Nistal F. , Garcia-Statue E. , Artinano E. , et al: Comparative study of primary tissue valve failure between Ionescu-Shiley pericardial and Hancock porcine valves in the aortic position. Am J Cardiol 57:161-164, 1986.

11.

Wallnberger E. , Jault F. , Fontanel M. , et al: Bioprothèses péricardiques de Sorin-Péricarbon: suivi à 4 ans. Arch Mal Coeur 87:325-328, 1994.

12.

Nguyen Van-Cao A. , Kucharsky K. , Veysslé L. , et al: The five years survival analysis of a new bioprothesis: The Pericarbon. Abstracts of the 42nd Annual Scientific Session American College of Cardiology, March 14-18 , 1993, Anaheim, CA. J Am Coll Cardiol 21:342A, 1993.

13.

Hamond GL , Geha AS , Hashim SW : Biological versus mechanical valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 93 :182-198, 1987.

14.

Lytle BW , Cosgrove DM , Taylor PC , et al: Primary isolated aortic valve replacement. Early and late results . J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 97:675-694, 1989.

15.

Morris JJ , Schaff HV , Mullany Chj , et al: Determinants of survival and recovery of left ventricular function after aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 56:22-30, 1993.

16.

Czer Lsc , Gray RJ , Stewart ME , et al: Reduction in sudden late death by concomitant revascularization with aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 95:390-401, 1988.

17.

Nunley DL , Grunkemeier GL , Starr A. : Aortic valve replacement with coronary bypass grafting. Significant determinants of ten-year survival. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 85:705-711, 1983.

18.

Jamieson Wre , Allen P. , Miyagishima RT , et al: The Carpentier-Edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis. A first-generation tissue valve with excellent long-term clinical performance. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 99:543-561, 1990.

19.

Aupart M. , Neville P. , Dreyfus X. , et al: The Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve: Intermediate results in 420 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 8:277-280, 1994.

20.

Grabenwöger M. , Grimm M. , Leukauf C. , et al: Failure mode of a new pericardial valve prosthesis (Sorin Pericarbon). A morphological study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 8:470-477, 1994.

21.

Frater RW , Salomon NW , Rainer WG , et al: The Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve: Intermediate results. Ann Thorac Surg 53:764-771, 1992.

22.

Gonzáles-Juanatey JR , Garcia Acuña JM , Amaro A. , et al: Doppler echocardiographic comparison of small (19 mm) bileaflet and pericardial heart valve prosthesis in aortic position. Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 29:29-35, 1995.

23.

Jamieson Wre , Burr LH , Munro AI , et al: Cardiac valve replacement in the elderly: Clinical performance of biological prostheses. Ann Thorac Surg 48:173-185, 1989.

24.

González-Lavin L. , González-Lavin J. , Chi S. , et al: The pericardial valve in the aortic position; ten years later. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 101:75-89, 1991.

25.

Wheatley DJ , Tolland MM , Pathi V. , et al: Randomized, prospective evaluation of a new pericardial heart valve: Outcome after seven years. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 9:259-268, 1995.