Digital Ventriculography: Valid On-Line Calculation of Cardiac Volumes by Corrected Computer Densitometry in Coronary Artery Disease

Abstract

Cardiac catheterization facilitates the assessment of left ventricular function in coronary artery disease (CAD). Digital left ventriculography offers the potential for an on-line quantitative determination of left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) and left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV). These are routinely evaluated by the area- length method (ALM), which is considered as a standard. Densitometry (DENS) is an alternative method but may lead to calculated underestimations.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy of corrected DENS for LVEDV and LVESV in comparison with ALM in single-plane 30° right anterior oblique (RAO) projection. The computer densitometric correction equation was adapted from the linear regression analysis (y=0.86x+2.73) in cardiac models and applied to the analysis of digital left ventriculograms in patients suffering from CAD.

The study of cardiac models yielded highly significant correlations (r≥ 0.9; P≤ 0.001) between true volumes and both DENS and ALM. DENS and ALM correlated highly signif icantly (r≥ 0.9; P ≤ 0.001) with a low standard error of estimate (SEE) of ±9.5 mL.

The comparison of DENS and ALM in 44 patients' digital ventriculograms exhibited highly significant (r=0.74; P ≤ 0.001) correlations for noncorrected and corrected LVEDV. Systematic underestimation by DENS of LVEDV disappeared after correction and SEE decreased from ±23.7 to ±19.2 mL. DENS and ALM correlated highly significantly for LVESV (r=0.78; P ≤ 0.001; SEE ± 15.6 mL ± 13.5 mL, respectively) after correction. Following correction, mean values for DENS increased from 116 ±32 to 132 ±37 mL (LVEDV) and 50 ±22 to 55 ±25 mL (LVESV). For ALM, mean values decreased from 159 ±35 to 127 ±28 mL (LVEDV) and 55 ±25 to 46 ±21 mL (LVESV).

This study shows that LVEDV and LVESV can be reliably analyzed on-line by corrected computer densitometry. Method-related errors of both DENS and ALM are present and account for minor volume deviations.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Hammermeister KE , De Rouen DA , Dodge HT : Variables predictive of survival in patients with coronary artery disease Circulation 59:421-430, 1979.

Battler A. , Slutsky R. , Karliner J., et al : Left ventricular ejection fraction and first-third ejection fraction early after myocardial infarction: A predictive value for mortality and survival Am J Cardiol 45:197-202, 1980.

Sanz G. , Castaner A. , Betriu A. : Determinants of prognosis in survivors of myocardial infarction: A prospective clinical angiographic study N Engl J Med 306:1065-1070, 1982.

Serota H. , Deligonul U. , Lee WH, et al : Predictors of cardiac survival after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction Am J Cardiol 67:367-372, 1991.

Odemuyiwa O. , Malik M. , Farrell T., et al : Comparison of the predictive characteristics of heart rate variability index and left ventricular ejection fraction for all-cause mortality, arrhythmic events and sudden death after acute myocardial infarction Am J Cardiol 68:434-439, 1991.

Kruger RA , Mistretta CA , Riederer SJ : Physical and technical considerations of computerized fluoroscopy difference imaging IEEE Trans Nucl Sci NS-28:205, 1981.

Tobis J. , Nalcioglu O. , Johnston WD, et al : Left ventricular imaging with digital subtraction angiography using intravenous contrast injection and fluoroscopic exposure levels. Am Heart J 104:20, 1982.

Kennedy JW , Trenholm SE , Kasser IS : Left ventricular volume and mass from single-plane cineangiograms : A comparison of the anteroposterior and right anterior oblique methods Am Heart J 80 :343-352, 1970.

Dodge HT , Sandler H. , Baxley WA, et al : Usefulness " and limitations of radiographic methods for determining left ventricular volume. Am J Cardiol 18:10-24, 1966.

10.

Sandler H. , Dodge HT : The use of single-plane angiocardiograms for the calculation of left ventricular volume Am Heart J 75:325-334, 1968.

11.

Cohn PF , Levine JA , Bergeron GA, et al : Reproducibility of the angiographic left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with coronary artery disease Am Heart J 88:713-720, 1974.

12.

Nissen SE , Booth DC , Waters J., et al : Evaluation of left ventricular contractile pattern by intravenous digital subtraction angiography: Comparison with cineangiography and assessment of interobserver variability Am J Cardiol 52:1293-1298, 1983.

13.

Erikson V. , Bjork L. , Cullhed I., et al : Left ventricular function evaluated by densitometry in patients with coronary heart disease Acta Radiol Diagn 19:737-746, 1978.

14.

Detrano R. , MacIntyre WJ , Salcedo E., et al : Videodensitometric ejection fraction from intravenous digital subtraction left ventriculograms: Correlation with conventional direct contrast and radionuclide ventriculography Radiology 155:19-23, 1985.

15.

Dodge HT , Sheehan FH , Stewart DK : Estimation of ventricular volume, fractional ejected volumes, stroke volume and quantitation of regurgitant flow In: Angiography: Current Status and Future Developments, ed. by Just H, Heintzen PH. Berlin: Springer, 1986, p 99.

16.

Lehmkuhl H. , Machnig T. , Eicker B., et al : Digital subtraction angiography: Feasibility of densitometric evaluation of left ventricular volumes and comparison to measurements obtained by the mono-plane area-length-method IEEE Proc Comput Cardiol, 1993, pp 29-32.

17.

Report of the Working Group of Arteriosclerosis of the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Vol. 2. DHEW Publication No. (NIH) 82-2035, Washington D.C., U.S. Government Printing Office, 1981.

18.

Tobis J. , Nalcioglu O. , Henry WL : Digital angiography: The implementation of computer technology for cardiovascular imaging Prog Cardiovasc Dis 18:195, 1985.

19.

Jones JW , Rackley CE , Bruce RA, et al : Left ventricular volumes in valvular heart disease Circulation 29:887-891, 1964.

20.

Hugenholtz PG , Wagner HR , Sandler H. : The in-vivo determination of left ventricular volume: Comparison of the fiberoptic-indicator dilution and the angiocardiographic methods Circulation 37:489, 1968.

21.

Tobis J. , Nalcioglu O. , Seibert JA, et al : Measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction by videodensitometric analysis of digital subtraction angiograms Am J Cardiol 52:871-875, 1983.

22.

Nissen SE , Elion JL , Grayburn P., et al : Determination of left ventricular ejection fraction from computer densitometric analysis of digital subtraction angiography : Experimental validation and correlation with area-length method Am J Cardiol 675-680, 1987.

23.

24.

Bartle SH , Sanmarco ME : Comparison of angiographic and thermal wash-out techniques for left ventricular volume measurements Am J Cardiol 18:235-252, 1966.

25.

Erikson V. , Helmius G. , Pavek K., et al : Videodensitometry and thermodilution for measuring left ventricular function Acta Radiol Diagn 21:621-625, 1980.

26.

Nissen SE , Elion JL , DeMaria AN : Value and limitations of densitometry in the calculation of right and left ventricular ejection fraction from digital subtraction angiography In: Clinical Applications of Cardiac Digital Angiography, ed. by Macini J. New York: Raven Press , 1988, pp 115-129.

27.

Nalcioglu O. , Seibert JA , Boone JM, et al : The effect of physical problems on the determination of ventricular ejection fraction by videodensitometry In: Digital Imaging in Cardiovascular Radiology, ed. by Heintzen PH, Brennecke R. Stuttgart : Georg Thieme Verlag, 1983, p 104.

28.

Nissen SE , Booth DC , Smith M., et al : Sources of error in videodensitometric calculation of ejection fraction Circulation 68(suppl II):350, 1983.

29.

Pfaff JM , Whiting JS , Eigler NE : Accurate videodensitometric quantification requires strict attention to the physical characteristics of x-ray imaging In: New Developments in Quantitative Coronary Angiography, ed. by Reiber JHC, Serruys PW. Kluwer Academic Publischers, 1988, pp 22-33.

30.

Shaw CG , Ergun DL , Myerowitz PD, et al : A technique of scatter and glare correction for videodensitometric studies in digital subtraction videoangiography. Radiology 142:209-213, 1982.

31.

Seibert JA , Boone JM : X-ray scatter removal by deconvolution Med Phys 15:567-575, 1988.

32.

Seibert JA , Nalcioglu O. , Roeck WW : Removal of image intensifier veiling glare by mathematical deconvolution techniques Med Phys 12:281-288, 1985.

33.

Tehrani S. , LeFree MT , Sitomer M. : High-speed digital radiographic pincushion distortion correction using an array processor IEEE Proc Comput Cardiol, 1986, pp 615-618.

34.

van Lysel MS , Miller WP , Fuerst TP, et al : Improved densitometric measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction using dual-energy digital subtraction angiography. Int J Card Imaging 10:113-121, 1994.