Pacing-Induced ST Segment Deviation in Patients with Unstable Angina: Clinical,Angiographic,and Hemodynamic Correlation

Abstract

To assess the clinical, coronary arteriographic, and hemodynamic differences between the unstable angina patients manifesting ST segment depression and those showing ST segment elevation as well as those demonstrating chest pain only without ST segment deviation during pacing, low-dose digital subtraction ventriculography was performed in 33 patients before and after abrupt cessation of atrial pacing during selective coronary arteriography. Transient ST segment depression during pacing was observed in 17 patients (52%), whereas 6 patients (18%) showed ST segment elevation; however, 10 patients (30%) did not manifest any ST segment deviation in spite of typical chest pain. Hypertension and a history of myocardial infarction were observed in a significantly higher (P < 0.05) proportion of patients with ST segment depression than in those with ST elevation. Patients who manifested ST segment depression during pacing had a higher incidence of triple-vessel disease (65 vs 17%; P < 0.05) as compared with the patients with ST segment elevation. Indirect evidence of intracoronary thrombi (complicated lesion, abrupt occlusion, and intraluminal filling defect) was noticed in a higher frequency (P < 0.05) in the group of patients with ST elevation during pacing. In patients with ST segment depression, no significant changes of global left ventricular (LV) func tional parameters were observed. However, the length of the LV severe hypokinetic region was increased significantly (6.2 ±3.1 vs 23.5 ±6.2%; P < 0.05) during pacing in this group of patients. The shortening of the affected segments of the left ventricle was decreased significantly (52.3 ±3.6 vs 38.3 ±4.9%; P < 0.05) in these patients during pacing. In the group of patients with ST segment elevation during pacing, decrease in ejection fraction was associated with significant (P < 0.01) increase in midwall equato rial diastolic stress as compared with the patients with pacing-induced ST segment depression as well as patients without ST segment deviation. In the group of patients without ST segment deviation during pacing there was no considerable aggravation of LV global or regional function. This distinction should be taken into consideration in evalu ating patients with unstable angina for diagnostic and therapeutic intervention.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cairns J. , Fantus J. , Klassen G. : Unstable angina pectoris. Am Heart J 92:373-386, 1976.

Conti C. , Brawley R. , Griffith L. , et al: Unstable angina pectoris: Morbidity and mortality in 57 consecutive patients evaluated angiographically. Am J Cardiol 32:745-750, 1973.

Scanlon P. : The intermediate coronary syndrome. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 23:351-364, 1981.

Plotnick G. , Fisher M. , Carliner N. , et al: Cardiac catheterization in patients with unstable angina. Recent onset vs crescendo angina. JAMA 244:574-576, 1980.

Betriu A. , Heras M. , Cohen M. , et al: Unstable angina: Outcome according to clinical presentation . J Am Coll Cardiol 19:1659-1663, 1992 .

Bertolet B. , Dinerman J. , Hartke R. , et al: Unstable angina: Relationship of clinical presentation, coronary artery pathology and clinical outcome. Clin Cardiol 16:116-122, 1993.

Figueras J. , Lidon R. : Coronary reserve, extent of coronary disease, recurrent angina and ECG changes during pain in the in-hospital prognosis of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 14:185-194,1993.

Demoulin J. , Bertholet M. , Chevigne M. , et al: Prognostic significance of electrocardiographic findings in angina at rest. Therapeutic implications. Br Heart J 46:320-324, 1981.

de Servi S. , Ghio S. , Ferrario M. , et al: Clinical and angiographic findings in angina at rest. Am Heart J 111:6-11, 1986.

10.

Takeuchi M. , Fujitani K. , Fukuzaki H. : The relation between left ventricular asynchrony, relaxation, outward wall motion and filling characteristics during control period and pacing-induced myocardial ischemia in coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiol 9:45-58, 1985.

11.

McLaurin L. , Rolet E. , Grossman W. : Impaired left ventricular relaxation during pacing-induced ischemia. Am J Cardiol 32:751-757, 1973.

12.

Dwyer E. : Left ventricular pressure. Volume alterations and regional disorders of contraction during myocardial ischemia induced by atrial pacing. Circulation 42:1111-1122, 1970.

13.

Braunwald E. : Unstable angina: A classification. Circulation 80:410-411, 1989.

14.

Kennedy P. , Kasser J. , Trehholme S. : Left ventricular volume and mass from single plane cineangiogram. Am Heart J 80:343-352, 1970.

15.

Pomerantsev E. , Savchenko A. , Domaradskaia A. , et al: Left ventriculography: Choice of an optimal method of analyzing segmental myocardial contractility in patients with ischemic heart disease. Vestn-Rentgenol-Radiol 1:18-23, 1988.

16.

Figueras J. , Cortadellas J. , Balda F. , et al: Noctural angina in patients with fixed coronary stenosis. Increased coronary vasoconstrictive sensitivity with independence of pacing ischaemic threshold. Eur Heart J 10:903-909, 1989.

17.

Berndt T. , Fitzgerald J. , Harrison D. , et al: Hemodynamic changes at the onset of spontaneous versus pacing-induced angina. Am J Cardiol 39:784-788, 1977.

18.

Linhart J. : Atrial pacing in coronary artery disease, including preinfarction angina and postoperative studies. Am J Cardiol 30:603-610, 1972.

19.

MacAlpin R. , Kattus A. , Alvaro A. : Angina pectoris at rest with preservation of exercise capacity. Prinzmetal's variant angina. Circulation 47:946-958, 1973.

20.

Papapietro S. , Niess G. , Paine T. , et al: Transient electrocardiographic changes in patients with unstable angina: Relation to coronary arterial anatomy. Am J Cardiol 46:28-33, 1980.

21.

Mark D. , Shaw L. , Harrell F. , et al: Prognostic value of a treadmill exercise score in outpatients with suspected coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 325:849-853, 1991.

22.

Podrid P. , Graboys T. , Lown B. : Prognosis of medically treated coronary disease patients with profound ST-segment depression during exercise testing. N Engl J Med 305:1111-1116, 1981.

23.

Tada M. , Yamagishi M. , Kodama K. , et al: Transient collateral augmentation during coronary arterial spasm associated with ST-segment depression. Circulation 67:693-698, 1983.

24.

Matsuda Y. , Ogawa H. , Moritani K. , et al: Transient appearance of collaterals during vasospastic occlusion in patients without obstructive coronary atherosclerosis. Am Heart J 109:759-763, 1985.

25.

Feldman R. , Hill J. , Whittle J. , et al: Electrocardiographic changes with coronary artery spasm. Am Heart J 106:1288-1297, 1983.

26.

Hoffman J. : Why is myocardial ischemia so often subendocardial? Clin Sci 61:657-662, 1981.

27.

MacAlpin R. : Contribution of dynamic vascular wall thickening to luminal narrowing during coronary arterial constriction. Circulation 61:296-301, 1980.

28.

Parodi O. , Severi S. , Uthurralt N. , et al: Angina pectoris at rest: Regional myocardial perfusion during ST segment elevation and depression (abstract). Circulation 56 (suppl III):III-229, 1979.

29.

Maseri A. , Parodi O. , Severi S. , et al: Transient transmural reduction of myocardial blood flow, demonstrated by thallium-201 scintigraphy, as a cause of variant angina. Circulation 54:280-288, 1976.

30.

Pomerantsev E. , Savchenko A. , Zharov I. , et al: Total and segmental contractile function of the left ventricle in acute myocardial infarction studied by angiography . Kardiologiia 28:20-24, 1988.

31.

Willich S. , Stone P. , Muller J. , et al: High risk subgroups of patients with non-Q wave myocardial infarction based on direction and severity of ST segment deviation. Am Heart J 114:1110-1118, 1987.

32.

Ogawa H. , Hiramori K. , Haze K. , et al: Classification of non-Q wave MI according to electrocardiographic changes. Br Heart J 54:473-478, 1985.

33.

Hollander G. , Ozick H. , Greengart A. , et al: High mortality early reinfarction with first nontransmural myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 108:1412-1416, 1984.