The vascular resistance of stenoses in series has been studied in vitro by use of fiber optic laser Doppler anemometry to measure the cross-sectional areas of the stenoses. Pressure gradients across each of the stenoses were measured while both the severity and the separation of the stenoses were altered. The individual resistances were compared with the combined resistance.
Resistance at a stenosis is a nonlinear function of the severity of the stenosis. The resistance is a complex function of the perfusion pressure and the cross-sectional area of the stenosis and cannot be accurately predicted from a single plane angiographic image. With multiple stenoses an approximate assessment of the combined effect can be obtained by summing the value of the resistance for each stenosis but not the degree of the stenoses. The nonlinear relationship of resistance to stenosis severity means that if one stenosis is more severe than the other, the combined effect can be regarded as the same as the effect of the more severe stenosis acting by itself. The distance between the stenoses does not change their combined effect.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Karayannacos PE, Talukder N., Nerem RM, et al: The role of multiple noncritical arterial stenosis in the pathogenesis of ischemia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg73:458-469, 1977.
2.
Talukder N., Karayannacos PE, Nerem RM, et al: An experimental study of the fluid dynamics of multiple noncritical stenoses. J Biomech EngTrans ASME5:74-82, 1977.
3.
Feldman RL, Nichols WW, Pepine CJ, et al: Hemodynamic effects of long and multiple coronary arterial narrowings . Chest74:280-285, 1978.
4.
Feldman RL, Nichols WW, Pepine CJ, et al: The coronary hemodynamics of left main and branch coronary stenoses. The effects of reduction in stenosis diameter, stenosis length, and number of stenoses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg77:377-388, 1979.
5.
Kilpatrick D. , Tyberg JV, Parmley WW: Blood velocity measurement by fibre optic laser Doppler anemometry. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng29:142-145, 1982.
6.
Kilpatrick D.: Laser fibre optic Doppler anemometry in the measurement of blood velocities in vivo. In: Computers in Cardiology, ed KL Ripley, IEEE Computer Society, Washington DC, 1980, pp. 467-470.
7.
Kilpatrick D. , Webber SD: Intravascular blood velocity in simulated coronary artery stenoses. Cathet Cardiovasc Diag12:317-323, 1986.
8.
Santamore WP , Bove AA, Carey RA, et al: Synergistic relation between vasoconstriction and fixed epicardial vessel stenosis in coronary artery disease. Am Heart J101:428-434, 1981.
9.
Logan S.: On the fluid mechanics of human coronary artery stenosis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng22:327-334, 1975.
10.
Byar D., Fiddian R., Querean M., et al: The fallacy of applying the Poiseuille equation to segmental arterial stenosis. Am Heart J70:216-224, 1965.
11.
Young D., Tsai F.: Flow characteristics in models of arterial stenosis I.Stead flow. J Biomechanics6:395-410, 1973.
12.
Young D., Tsai F.: Flow characteristics in models of arterial stenosis II. Unsteady flow. J Biomechanics6:547-559, 1973.
13.
Deshpande M. , Giddens D., Mabon R.: Steady laminar flow through modelled vacular stenoses. J Biomechanics9:165-174, 1976.
14.
Mates R., Gupta R., Bell A., et al: Fluid dynamics of coronary artery stenosis. Circ Res42:152-162, 1978.
15.
Abrams HL: Coronary Arteriography: A Practical Approach. Boston: Little Brown and Co, 1983.
