Real-Time Ultrasound for Diagnosis of Symptomatic Venous Thrombosis and for Screening of Patients at Risk: Correlation with Ascending Conventional Venography

Abstract

This is a prospective study of 108 patients in two distinct groups undergoing real-time ultrasonography (US) and ascending conventional venography within the same day. The two patient groups consisted of the following: Those patients evaluated because of suspicion of deep venous thrombosis of lower limbs (69 patients) and those at high risk for venous thrombosis (19 patients with a recent hip fracture, 20 with a suspected pulmonary embolism). In the diagnosis group 48 patients had venographic evidence of thrombosis. The predictive value of abnormal findings from real-time US was 97%, and that of a negative study was 75%. Thus, real-time US may have a role as a diagnostic procedure, to be fol lowed by x-ray venography in patients with negative US results.

By contrast, real-time US is far less sensitive as a screening test in patients without clinical evidence of thrombosis. Only 3 of 9 patients with thrombosis were detected, with a 50% sensitivity for proximal vein thrombosis. Therefore, the use of real-time US for screening high-risk patients must be limited to very high risk patients in whom other tests are ineffective (as in hip surgery).

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Effeney DJ , Friedman MB , Gooding Gaw : Iliofemoral venous thrombosis: Real-time ultrasound diagnosis, normal criteria, and clinical application. Radiology 150:787-792, 1984.

Dauzat MM , Laroche JP , Charras CH , et al: Real-time B-mode ultrasonography for better specificity in the noninvasive diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis. J Ultrasound Med 5:625-631, 1986.

Cronan JJ , Dorfman GS , Scola FH , et al: Deep venous thrombosis: US assessment using vein compression . Radiology 162:191-194, 1987

Vogel P. , Laing FC , Jeffrey RB , et al: Deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremity: US evaluation . Radiology 163:747-751, 1987.

Appelman PT, De Jong TE, Lampmann LE: Deep venous thrombosis of the leg: US findings. Radiology 163:743-746, 1987.

Raghavendra BN , Horii SC , Hilton S. , et al: Deep venous thrombosis: Detection by probe compression of veins. J Ultrasound Med 5:89-95, 1986.

Polak JF , O'Leary DH: Deep venous thrombosis in pregnancy: Noninvasive diagnosis . Radiology 66:377-379, 1988.

Flanigan DP , Goodreau JJ , Burnham SJ , et al: Vascular-laboratory diagnosis of clinicaly suspected acute deep-vein thrombosis. Lancet II:331-334, 1978.

Hull R. , Hirsh J. , Sackett DL , et al: Cost-effectiveness of clinical diagnosis, venography, and noninvasive testing for diagnosis and surveillance of deep vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med 304:561-1567, 1981.

10.

Holden RW , Klatte EC , Park HM , et al: Efficacy of noninvasive modalities for diagnosis of thrombophlebitis . Radiology 141:63-66, 1981.

11.

Sandler DA , Martin JF , Duncan JS , et al: Diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis: Comparison of clinical evaluation, ultrasound, plethysmography, and venoscan with X-ray venogram. Lancet II:716-719, 1984.

12.

Ramchandi PR , Soulen RL , Fedullo LM , et al: Deep vein thrombosis: Significant limitations of noninvasive tests. Radiology 156:47-49, 1985.

13.

Vaccaro P. , Van Aman M. , Miller S. , et al: Shortcomings of physical examination and impedance plethysmography in the diagnosis of lower extremity deep venous thrombosis. Angiology 3:232-235, 1987.

14.

Comerota AJ , Katz ML , Grossi RJ , et al: The comparative value of noninvasive testing for diagnosis and surveillance of deep vein thrombosis . J Vasc Surp 7:40-49, 1988.

15.

Rosner NG , Doris PE : Diagnosis of femoropopliteal venous thrombosis: Comparison of Duplex sonography and plethysmography. AJR 150:623-627, 1988.

16.

Sumner DS : Doppler ultrasound. In; Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism. Diagnostic Methods, ed. by Hirsh J. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1987 , pp 54-76.

17.

Whitehouse G. : Radiological diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis . Br Med J 295:801-802, 1987.

18.

Sevitt S. , Gallagher N. : Venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Br J Surg 48:475-489, 1961.

19.

Kakkar VV , Corrigan TP : Efficacy of low-dose heparin in preventing fatal pulmonary embolism: Results of an international multicentre trial. In: Heparin: Chemistry and Clinical Usage, ed. by Kakkar VV , Thomas DP. London: Academic Press, pp 229-245.

20.

Barnes RW : Current status of noninvasive tests in the diagnosis of venous disease . Surg Clin North Am 62:489-500, 1982.

21.

Bergqvist D. : Frequency of thromboembolic complications . In: Postoperative Thromboembolism. Frequency, Etiology, Prophylaxis . Berlin : Springer-Verlag, 1983, pp 6-34.

22.

Harris WH , Salzman E. , Athanasoulis C. , et al: Comparison of 125I-fibrinogen count scanning with phlebography for detection of venous thrombi after elective hip surgery. N Engl J Med 292:665-670, 1975.

23.

Turpie Agg , Levine MN , Hirsh J. , et al: A randomized controlled trial of a low-molecular-weight heparin (Enoxaparin) to prevent deep-vein thrombosis in patients undergoing elective hip surgery. N Engl J Med 315:925-929, 1986.