Abstract
Increased criticism concerning the alleged misdiagnosis and overdiagnosis of deep vein thrombophlebitis (DVT) in the lower extremities, and of pulmo nary embolism, is being leveled at clinicians when unequivocal documentation by venography, lung scanning, and pulmonary angiography is lacking. The ex cessive adoption of this attitude by audit and utilization committees could prove dangerous for patients with these conditions, particularly when rigid cri teria intimidate the physician and override his clinical judgment and experi ence. The matter assumes added importance in view of the increasing magni tude of DVT and pulmonary embolism.
The following pertinent issues will be discussed:
The combination of these insights, greater confidence in clinical skills, and newer noninvasive diagnostic methods promise to help resolve this heated con troversy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
