XieYCenHWangL, et al. Relationships between inflammatory parameters derived from complete blood count and quantitative flow ratio in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Angiology. 2025;76:51-7.
2.
GuaricciAIPontoneGFusiniL, et al. Additional value of inflammatory biomarkers and carotid artery disease in prediction of significant coronary artery disease as assessed by coronary computed tomography angiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;18:1049-56.
3.
AslanANÖzcanANAyhanH, et al. Evaluation of local carotid stiffness and inflammatory biomarkers in stable angina pectoris. Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2017;13:122-9.
4.
AydınCUyanUKaradenizMDemirkıranA. Role of simple inflammatory parameters in predicting the severity of coronary artery disease. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2023;9:e20230518.
5.
VerdoiaMBarbieriLDi GiovineG, et al. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and the extent of coronary artery disease: results from a large cohort study. Angiology. 2016;67:75-82.
6.
DiamantisEKyriakosGQuiles-SanchezLVFarmakiPTroupisT.The anti-inflammatory effects of statins on coronary artery disease: an updated review of the literature. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2017;13:209-16.
7.
AndersenBKSejr-HansenMWestraJ, et al. Quantitative flow ratio versus fractional flow reserve for guiding percutaneouscoronary intervention: design and rationale of the randomised FAVOR III Europe Japan trial. EuroIntervention. 2023;18:e1358-64.
