We compared the efficacy and complication rates of quantitative radiofrequency ablation guided by ablation index (RFCA-AI) with those of second-generation cryoballoon ablation (CBA-2). Consecutive patients (n = 230) with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing a first ablation CBA-2 (92 patients) or RFCA-AI (138 patients) procedure were enrolled in this study. The late recurrence rate in the CBA-2 group was higher than that in the RFCA-AI group (P = .012). Subgroup analysis showed the same result in patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF) (P = .039), but no difference was found in patients with persistent AF (P = .21). The average operation duration in the CBA-2 group (85 [75-99.5] minutes) was shorter than that in the RFCA-AI group (100 [84.5-120] minutes) (P < .0001), but the average exposure time (17.36(13.87-22.49) vs 5.49(4.00-8.24) minutes) in the CBA-2 group and X-ray dose (223.25(149.15-336.95) vs 109.15(80.75-168.7) mGym) were significantly longer than those in RFCA-AI group (P < .0001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that left atrial diameter (LAD), early recurrence, and methods of ablation (cryoballoon ablation) were independent risk factors for late recurrence after AF ablation. Early recurrence of AF and LAD were independent risk factors for predicting late recurrence after AF ablation.
KuckKHHoffmannBAErnstS, et al.Impact of complete versus incomplete circumferential lines around the pulmonary veins during catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: results from the gap-atrial fibrillation-german atrial fibrillation competence network 1 trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol2016;9:e003337.
2.
McLellanAJALingLHAzzopardiS, et al.A minimal or maximal ablation strategy to achieve pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a prospective multi-centre randomized controlled trial (the minimax study). Eur Heart J2015;36:1812-1821.
3.
NakagawaHScherlagBJPattersonE, et al.Pathophysiologic basis of autonomic ganglionated plexus ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm2009;6(12 Suppl):S26-S34.
4.
HaissaguerreMJaisPShahDC, et al.Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. N Engl J Med1998;339:659-666.
5.
SquaraFZhaoAMarijonE, et al.Comparison between radiofrequency with contact force-sensing and second-generation cryoballoon for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: a multicentre European evaluation. Europace2015;17:718-724.
6.
SolimeneFSchillaciVShopovaG, et al.Safety and efficacy of atrial fibrillation ablation guided by ablation index module. J Intervent Card Electrophysiol2019;54:9-15.
7.
PranataRVaniaRHuangI. Ablation-index guided versus conventional contact-force guided ablation in pulmonary vein isolation - Systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J2019;19:155–160.
8.
HusseinADasMRivaS, et al.Use of ablation index-guided ablation results in high rates of durable pulmonary vein isolation and freedom from arrhythmia in persistent atrial fibrillation patients: the PRAISE study results. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol2018;11:e006576.
9.
TanakaNInoueKTanakaK, et al.Automated ablation annotation algorithm reduces re-conduction of isolated pulmonary vein and improves outcome after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Circ J2017;81:1596-1602.
10.
HusseinADasMChaturvediV, et al.Prospective use of ablation index targets improves clinical outcomes following ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol2017;28:1037-1047.
11.
GuptaDPotterTDDisherT, et al.Comparative effectiveness of catheter ablation devices in the treatment of atrial fibrillation: a network meta-analysis. J Comp Eff Res2020;9:115-126.
12.
KirchhofPBenussiSKotechaD, et al.ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Rev Esp Cardiol2017;70:2893-2962.
13.
CalkinsHHindricksGCappatoR, et al.HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Europace2018;20:e1-e160.
14.
ContiSMoltrasioMFassiniG, et al.Comparison between first- and second-generation cryoballoon for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation. Cardiol Res Pract2016;2016:5106127.
15.
StraubeFDorwarthUSchmidtM, et al.Comparison of the first and second cryoballoon: high-volume single-center safety and efficacy analysis. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol2014;7:293-299.
16.
FurnkranzABordignonSDugoD, et al.Improved 1-year clinical success rate of pulmonary vein isolation with the second-generation cryoballoon in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol2014;25:840-844.
17.
KühneMSchaerBAmmannP, et al.Cryoballoon ablation for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Swiss Med Wkly2010;140(15-16):214-221.
18.
ItohTKimuraMTomitaH, et al.Reduced residual conduction gaps and favourable outcome in contact force-guided circumferential pulmonary vein isolation. Europace2016;18:531-537.
19.
SalasJCastellanosEPeinadoR, et al.Atrial mapping during pulmonary vein pacing: a novel maneuver to detect and close residual conduction gaps in an ablation line. J Intervent Card Electrophysiol2016;47:299-307.
20.
SandorfiGRodriguez-MañeroMSaenenJ, et al.Less pulmonary vein reconnection at redo procedures following radiofrequency point-by-point antral pulmonary vein isolation with the use of contemporary catheter ablation technologies. JACC Clin Electrophysiol2018;4:1556-1565.
21.
DasMLovedayJJWynnGJ, et al.Ablation index, a novel marker of ablation lesion quality: prediction of pulmonary vein reconnection at repeat electrophysiology study and regional differences in target values. Europace2017;19:775-783.
22.
TaghjiPEl HaddadMPhlipsT, et al.Evaluation of a strategy aiming to enclose the pulmonary veins with contiguous and optimized radiofrequency lesions in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a pilot study. JACC Clin Electrophysiol2018;4:99-108.
23.
ChenCFGaoXFDuanX, et al.Comparison of catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation between cryoballoon and radiofrequency: a meta-analysis. J Intervent Card Electrophysiol2017;48:351-366.
24.
StraubeFDorwarthUAmmar-BuschS, et al.First-line catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: outcome of radiofrequency vs. cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation. Europace2016;18:368-375.
25.
AndradeJGKhairyPGuerraPG, et al.Efficacy and safety of cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review of published studies. Heart Rhythm2011;88:18281444-18281451.
26.
YuLScherlagBJLiS, et al.Low-level transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the auricular branch of the vagus nerve: a noninvasive approach to treat the initial phase of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm2013;10:428-435.
27.
AryanaASinghSMKowalskiM, et al.Acute and long-term outcomes of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using the second-generation cryoballoon versus open-irrigated radiofrequency: a multicenter experience. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol2015;26:832-839.
28.
LuikARadzewitzAKieserM, et al.Cryoballoon versus open irrigated radiofrequency ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: the prospective, randomized, controlled, noninferiority FreezeAF study. Circulation2015;132:1311-1319.
29.
LiangJJElafrosMAChikWW, et al.Early recurrence of atrial arrhythmias following pulmonary vein antral isolation: Timing and frequency of early recurrences predicts long-term ablation success. Heart Rhythm2015;12:2461-2468.
30.
VizzardiECurnisALatiniMG, et al.Risk factors for atrial fibrillation recurrence: a literature review. J Cardiovasc Med2014;15:235-253.
31.
ZhaoLJiangWZhouL, et al.Why atrial fibrillation recurs in patients who obtained current ablation endpoints with longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation. J Intervent Card Electrophysiol2013;37:283-290.
32.
ZacàVGalderisiMMondilloS, et al.Left atrial enlargement as a predictor of recurrences in lone paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Can J Cardiol2007;23:869-872.
