Kolkenbeck-RuhAWoodiwissAJMonarengT, et al.Complementary impact of carotid intima-media thickness with plaque in associations with noncardiac arterial vascular events. Angiology. 2019;71(2):122–130. doi:10.1177/0003319719862681
2.
BondMGWilmothSKGardinJFBarnesRWSawyerJK. Noninvasive assessment of atherosclerosis in nonhuman primates. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1985;183:189–95.
3.
PignoliPTremoliEPoliAOrestePPaolettiR. Intimal plus medial thickness of the arterial wall: a direct measurement with ultrasound imaging. Circulation. 1986;74(6):1399–406.
4.
SpenceJD. Measurement of intima-media thickness vs. carotid plaque: uses in patient care, genetic research and evaluation of new therapies. Int J Stroke. 2006;1(4):216–21.
5.
SpenceJDYoichiIJenniferAStevenR. Carotid plaque measurement is superior to IMT: invited editorial comment on: carotid plaque, compared with carotid intima-media thickness, more accurately predicts coronary artery disease events: a meta-analysis. Atherosclerosis. 2012;220(1):34–5.
6.
ManciaGDe BackerGDominiczakA, et al.The task force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2007;28:1462–536.
7.
GrahamIAtarDBorch-JohnsenK, et al.European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation (EACPR). European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: executive summary. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2007;14(suppl 2):E1–40.
RundekTGardenerHDella-MorteD, et al.The relationship between carotid intima-media thickness and carotid plaque in the Northern Manhattan Study. Atherosclerosis. 2015;241(2):364–70.
10.
TouboulPJHennericiMGMeairsS, et al.Mannheim carotid intima-media thickness consensus and plaque consensus (2004-2006-2011). An update on behalf of the advisory board of the 3rd, 4th and 5th watching the risk symposia at the 13th, 15th and 20th European Stroke Conferences, Mannheim, Germany, 2004, Brussels, Belgium, 2006 and Hamburg, Germany, 2011. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012;34(4):290–6.
11.
RundekTArifHBoden-AlbalaB, et al.Carotid plaque, a subclinical precursor of vascular events: the Northern Manhattan study. Neurology. 2008;70(14):1200–7.
MathiesenEBJohnsenSHWilsgaardTBønaaKHLøchenMLNjølstadI. Carotid plaque area and intima-media thickness in prediction of first-ever ischemic stroke: a 10-year follow-up of 6584 men and women: the Tromsø study. Stroke. 2011;42(4):972–8.
14.
HerderMJohnsenSHArntzenKAMathiesenEB. Risk factors for progression of carotid intima-media thickness and total plaque area: a 13-year follow-up study: the Tromsø study. Stroke. 2012;43(7):1818–23.
15.
InabaYChenJABergmannSR. Carotid plaque, compared with carotid intima-media thickness, more accurately predicts coronary artery disease events: a meta-analysis. Atherosclerosis. 2012;220(1):128–33.
16.
BarnettPASpenceJDManuckSBJenningsJR. Psychological stress and the progression of carotid artery disease. J Hypertens. 1997;15(1):49–55.
17.
SpenceJDEliasziwMDiCiccoMHackamDGGalilRLohmannT. Carotid plaque area: a tool for targeting and evaluating vascular preventive therapy. Stroke. 2002;33(12):2916–22.
18.
KhannaNNJamthikarADGuptaD, et al.Effect of carotid image-based phenotypes on cardiovascular risk calculator: AECRS1.0. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2019;57(7):1553–6.
19.
JohnsenSHMathiesenEBJoakimsenO, et al.Carotid atherosclerosis is a stronger predictor of myocardial infarction in women than in men: a 6-year follow-up study of 6226 persons: the Tromsø study. Stroke. 2007;38(11):2873–80.
20.
ZhangYFangXHuaY, et al.Carotid artery plaques, carotid intima-media thickness, and risk of cardiovascular events and all-cause death in older adults: a 5-year prospective, community-based study. Angiology. 2018;69(2):120–9.
21.
SillesenHMuntendamPAdourianA, et al.Carotid plaque burden as a measure of subclinical atherosclerosis: comparison with other tests for subclinical arterial disease in the High Risk Plaque BioImage Study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5(7):681–9.
22.
BaberUMehranRSartoriS, et al.Prevalence, impact, and predictive value of detecting subclinical coronary and carotid atherosclerosis in asymptomatic adults: the BioImage Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(11):1065–74.
23.
WannarongTParragaGBuchananD, et al.Progression of carotid plaque volume predicts cardiovascular events. Stroke. 2013;44(7):1859–65.
24.
LorenzMWPolakJFKavousiM, et al.Carotid intima-media thickness progression to predict cardiovascular events in the general population (the PROG-IMT collaborative project): a meta-analysis of individual participant data. Lancet. 2012;379(0931):2053–62.
25.
SpenceJD. The importance of distinguishing between diffuse carotid intima medial thickening and focal plaque. Can J Cardiol. 2008;24(C):61C–4C.
26.
BotsMLEvansGWRileyWAGrobbeeDE. Carotid intima-media thickness measurements in intervention studies: design options, progression rates, and sample size considerations: a point of view. Stroke. 2003;34(12):2985–94.
27.
NoyesAMThompsonPD. A systematic review of the time course of atherosclerotic plaque regression. Atherosclerosis. 2014;234(1):75–84.
28.
AinsworthCDBlakeCCTamayoABeletskyVFensterA, Spence JD. 3D ultrasound measurement of change in carotid plaque volume: a tool for rapid evaluation of new therapies. Stroke. 2005;36(9):1904–9.
29.
SpenceJD.Coronary calcium is not all we need: carotid plaque burden measured by ultrasound is better. Atherosclerosis. 2019;287:179–80.
30.
SpenceJDHackamDG. Treating arteries instead of risk factors. a paradigm change in management of atherosclerosis. Stroke. 2010;41(6):1193–9.
31.
SpenceJDCoatesVLiHTamayoA, et al.Effects of intensive medical therapy on microemboli and cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Arch Neurol. 2010;67(2):180–6.
32.
GoffDCJrLloyd-JonesDMBennettG, et al.2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(25 pt B):2935–59.
33.
PiepoliMFHoesAWAgewallS, et al.; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2016 European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: the Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in clinical practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR). Eur Heart J. 2016;37(29):2315–81.
34.
MachFBaigentCCatapanoAL, et al.Task force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS). 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk [published online ahead of print 31 August 2019]. Eur Heart J. 2019. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz455.
35.
EggerMSpenceJDFensterAParragaG. Validation of 3d ultrasound vessel wall volume: an imaging phenotype of carotid atherosclerosis. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007;33(6):905–14.
36.
ShaiISpenceJDSchwarzfuchsD, et al.Dietary intervention to reverse carotid atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2010;121(10):1200–8.
37.
SpenceJD. Approaching automated 3-dimensional measurement of atherosclerotic plaque volume. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(3):314–7.
