DuYYangBZhangJet al.Optimal revascularization threshold of fractional flow reserve and its effect on outcomes: perspective from a high-volume center in China. Angiology. 2019;70(5):423–30
2.
BechGJDe BruyneBPijlsNHet al.Fractional flow reserve to determine the appropriateness of angioplasty in moderate coronary stenosis: a randomized trial. Circulation. 2001;103(24):2928–34.
3.
De BruyneBPijlsNHBartunekJet al.Fractional flow reserve in patients with prior myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2001;104(2):157–62.
4.
De BruyneBBartunekJSysSUHeyndrickxGR. Relation between myocardial fractional flow reserve calculated from coronary pressure measurements and exercise-induced myocardial ischemia. Circulation. 1995;92(1):39–46.
5.
SamadyHLepperWPowersERet al.Fractional flow reserve of infarct-related arteries identifies reversible defects on noninvasive myocardial perfusion imaging early after myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47(11):2187–93.
6.
AbeMTomiyamaHYoshidaHDobaN. Diastolic fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of moderate coronary artery stenoses: comparison with fractional flow reserve and coronary flow velocity reserve. Circulation. 2000;102(19):2365–70.
7.
BartunekJVan SchuerbeeckEde BruyneB. Comparison of exercise electrocardiography and dobutamine echocardiography with invasively assessed myocardial fractional flow reserve in evaluation of severity of coronary arterial narrowing. Am J Cardiol. 1997;79(4):478–81.
8.
PijlsNHDe BruyneBPeelsKet al.Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(26):1703–8.
9.
De BruyneBBaudhuinTMelinJAet al.Coronary flow reserve calculated from pressure measurements in humans. Validation with positron emission tomography. Circulation. 1994;89(3):1013–22.
10.
ColletCOnumaYSonckJet al.Diagnostic performance of angiography-derived fractional flow reserve: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(35):3314–21.
11.
ChuMDaiNYangJWestraJTuS. A systematic review of imaging anatomy in predicting functional significance of coronary stenoses determined by fractional flow reserve. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;33(7):975–90.
12.
GarciaSSandovalYRoukozHet al.Outcomes after complete versus incomplete revascularization of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of 89,883 patients enrolled in randomized clinical trials and observational studies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(16):1421–31.
13.
EnezateTOmranJAl-DadahASet al.Fractional flow reserve versus angiography guided percutaneous coronary intervention: An updated systematic review. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;92(1):18–27.
14.
BundhunPKYanamalaCMHuangF. Comparing the adverse clinical outcomes associated with fraction flow reserve-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016;16(1):249.
15.
XiuJChenGZhengHet al.Comparing treatment outcomes of fractional flow reserve-guided and angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Invest Med. 2016;39(1):E25–36.
16.
NascimentoBRBelfortAFMacedoFAet al.Meta-analysis of deferral versus performance of coronary intervention based on coronary pressure-derived fractional flow reserve. Am J Cardiol. 2015;115(3):385–91.
17.
RimacGFearonWFDe BruyneBet al.Clinical value of post-percutaneous coronary intervention fractional flow reserve value: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am Heart J. 2017;183:1–9.
18.
WolfrumMFahrniGde MariaGLet al.Impact of impaired fractional flow reserve after coronary interventions on outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016;16(1):177.
19.
DengSBJingXDWangJet al.Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2015;184:703–9.
20.
WuWPanDRFoinNet al.Noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography for identification of ischemic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2016;6:29409.
21.
CookCMPetracoRShun-ShinMJet al.Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve: a systematic review. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2(7):803–10.
22.
GabrielJKlimachSLangPHildick-SmithD. Should computed tomography angiography supersede invasive coronary angiography for the evaluation of graft patency following coronary artery bypass graft surgery?Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015;21(2):231–9.
23.
LeeJZSinghNNyotowidjojoIet al.Comparison of regadenoson and nitroprusside to adenosine for measurement of fractional flow reserve: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018;19(2):168–74.
24.
GiliSBarberoUErrigoDet al.Intracoronary versus intravenous adenosine to assess fractional flow reserve: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2018;19(6):274–83.
25.
MartinsJLAfreixoVSantosJGonçalvesL. Fractional flow reserve-guided strategy in acute coronary syndrome. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2018;111(4):542–50.
26.
LiouKPOoiSMHooleSPWestNEJ. Fractional flow reserve in acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Open Heart. 2019;6(1):e000934.
27.
Hideo-KajitaAGarcia-GarciaHMKukuKOet al.Clinical outcomes of complete revascularization using either angiography-guided or fractional flow reserve-guided drug-eluting stent implantation in non-culprit vessels in ST elevation myocardial infarction patients: insights from a study based on a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;34(9):1349–64.
28.
GuptaABajajNSAroraPet al.FFR-guided multivessel stenting reduces urgent revascularization compared with infarct-related artery only stenting in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Cardiol. 2018;252:63–7.
29.
WangLJHanSZhangXHJinYZ. Fractional flow reserve-guided complete revascularization versus culprit-only revascularization in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multi-vessel disease patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019;19(1):49.
30.
FindlayINCunninghamAD. Definition of acute coronary syndrome. Heart. 2005;91:857–9.
31.
CerratoEEchavarria-PintoMD’AscenzoFet al.Safety of intermediate left main stenosis revascularization deferral based on fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound: A systematic review and meta-regression including 908 deferred left main stenosis from 12 studies. Int J Cardiol. 2018;271:42–8.
32.
Bairey MerzCNPepineCJWalshMNFlegJL. Ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA): developing evidence-based therapies and research agenda for the next decade. Circulation. 2017;135(11):1075–92.
33.
DeMariaANLeeGAmsterdamEALowRMasonDT. The anginal syndrome with normal coronary arteries. Etiologic and prognostic considerations. JAMA. 1980;244(8):826–8.
34.
LeeBKLimHSFearonWFet al.Invasive evaluation of patients with angina in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2015;131(12):1054–60.
35.
PatelMRPetersonEDDaiDet al.Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(10):886–985.
36.
ShahSJLamCSPSvedlundSet al.Prevalence and correlates of coronary microvascular dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: PROMIS-HFpEF. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(37):3439–50.
37.
Bairey MerzCNPepineCJ. Syndrome X and microvascular coronary dysfunction. Circulation. 2011;124(13):1477–80.
38.
FearonWFBalsamLBFarouqueHMet al.Novel index for invasively assessing the coronary microcirculation. Circulation. 2003;107(25):3129–32.
39.
NgMKYeungACFearonWF. Invasive assessment of the coronary microcirculation: superior reproducibility and less hemodynamic dependence of index of microcirculatory resistance compared with coronary flow reserve. Circulation. 2006;113(17):2054–61.
40.
KoudstaalSJansen Of LorkeersSJvan SlochterenFJet al.Assessment of coronary microvascular resistance in the chronic infarcted pig heart. J Cell Mol Med. 2013;17(9):1128–35.
