JinCXuYQiaoS. Comparison of transradial and transfemoral approaches in women undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in China: a retrospective observational study. Angiology. 2017;68(9):799–806.
2.
BianchiRD’AciernoLCrisciM. From femoral to radial approach in coronary intervention: review of literature and 6 years single center experience. Angiology. 2016. doi:0003319716656714. Published July 19, 2016.
3.
JollySSYusufSCairnsJ; RIVAL Trial Group. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography end intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomized parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2011;377(9775):1409–1420.
4.
ValgimigliM; MATRIX Investigators. Design and rationale for the Minimizing Adverse haemorrhagic events by TRansradial access site and systemic Implementation of angioX program. Am Heart J. 2014;168(6):838–845.
5.
AlnasserSMBagaiAJollySS. Transradial approach for coronary angiography and intervention in the elderly: a meta-analysis of 777841 patients. Int J Cardiol. 2017;228:45–51.
6.
MelloniCBergerJSWangTY. Representation of women in randomized clinical trials of cardiovascular disease prevention. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010;3(2):135–142.
7.
SaitoSIkeiHHosokawaGTanakaS. Influence of the ratio between radial artery inner diameter and sheath outer diameter on radial artery flow after transradial coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 1999;46(2):173–178.
8.
DehghaniPMohammadABajajR. Mechanism and predictors of failed transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2(11):1057–1064.
9.
RaoSVHessCNBarhamB. A registry-based randomized trial comparing radial and femoral approaches in women undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: the SAFE-PCI for women (Study of Access Site for Enhancement of PCI for Women) trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7(8):857–867.
10.
HessCMKrucoffMWShengS. Comparison of quality of life measures after radial versus femoral artery access for cardiac catheterization for women: results of the study of access site enhancement of percutaneous coronary intervention for women quality of life substudy. Am Heart J. 2015;170(2):371–379.
11.
ValgimigliMGagbnorACalabroP; Matrix Investigators. Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9986):2465–2476.
