FeldmanDNSwaminathanRVKaltenbachLA. Adoption of radial access and comparison of outcomes to femoral access in percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated report from the national cardiovascular data registry (2007-2012). Circulation. 2013;127(23):2295–2306.
2.
LeeMSWolfeMStoneGW. Transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes: re-evaluation of the current body of evidence. J Am Coll Cardiol Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6(11):1149–1152.
3.
AndòGCapodannoD. Radial versus femoral access in invasively managed patients with acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163(12):932–940.
4.
HuangFYHuangBTWangPJ. Gender disparity in the safety and efficacy of radial and femoral access for coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Angiology. 2016;67(9):810–819.
5.
Abdul JabbarAMuftiOSabolAMarkertRWhiteBBroderickG. Arterial access in patients with de novo acute coronary syndrome undergoing coronary angiography. Angiology. 2017;68(4):360–365.
6.
BalciKBalciMAkbogaM. Transradial or transfemoral access for patients with de novo acute coronary syndrome? Choosing the best approach. Angiology. 2017;68(4):374.
7.
PlourdeGPancholySBNolanJ. Radiation exposure in relation to the arterial access site used for diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2015;386(10009):2192–2203.
8.
MounseyCAMawhinneyJAWernerRSTaggartDP. Does previous transradial catheterization preclude use of the radial artery as a conduit in coronary artery bypass surgery?Circulation. 2016;134:681–688.