North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 1991;352(7):445–453.
2.
MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0-29%) carotid stenosis. European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Lancet. 1991;337(8752):1235–1243.
3.
BillerJFeinbergWMCastaldoJE. Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy: a statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association. Stroke. 1998;29(2):554–562.
4.
NaylorAR. Delay may reduce procedural risk, but at what price to the patient?Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008;35(4):383–391.
5.
RothwellPMEliasziwMGutnikovSAWarlowCPBarnettHJ; Carotid Endarterectomy Trialists Collaboration. Endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis in relation to clinical subgroups and timing of surgery. Lancet. 2004;363(9413):915–924.
6.
GaseckiAPFergusonGGEliasziwM. Early endarterectomy for severe carotid artery stenosis after a nondisabling stroke: results from the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. J Vasc Surg. 1994;20(2):288–295.
FurieKLKasnerSEAdamsRJ; American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and Interdisciplinary Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2011;42(1):227–276.
9.
KarkosCDHernandez-LahozINaylorAR. Urgent carotid surgery in patients with crescendo transient ischaemic attacks and stroke-in-evolution: a systematic review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;37(3):279–288.
10.
RerkasemKRothwellPM. Systematic review of the operative risks of carotid endarterectomy for recently symptomatic stenosis in relation to the timing of surgery. Stroke. 2009;40(10):e564–e572.
11.
PattersonBOHoltPJHinchliffeRJThompsonMMLoftusIM. Urgent carotid endarterectomy for patients with unstable symptoms: systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes. Vascular. 2009;17(5): 243–252.
StrombergSGelinJOsterbergTBergstromGMKarlstromLOsterbergK; Swedish Vascular Registry (Swedvasc) Steering Committee. Very urgent carotid endarterectomy confers increased procedural risk. Stroke. 2012;43(5):1331–1335.
14.
NaylorAR. Letter by Naylor regarding article, “Very urgent carotid endarterectomy confers increased procedural risk”. Stroke. 2012;43(9):e94.
15.
TsivgoulisGKrogiasCGeorgiadisGS. Safety of early endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis: an international multicenter study. Eur J Neurol. 2014;21(10):1251–1257.
16.
RantnerBSchmidauerCKnoflachMFraedrichG. Very urgent carotid endarterectomy does not increase the procedural risk. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015;49(2):129–136.
17.
MaybergMRWilsonSEYatsuF. Carotid endarterectomy and prevention of cerebral ischemia in symptomatic carotid stenosis. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program 309 Trialist Group. JAMA. 1991;266(23):3289–3294.
18.
NaylorAR. Time is brain!Surgeon. 2007;5(1):23–30.
19.
LoftusIMParaskevasKIJohalA. Delays to surgery and procedural risks following carotid endarterectomy in the UK National Vascular Registry [published online June 27, 2016]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. pii:S1078-5884(16)30166-6. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.05.31.
20.
ParaskevasKIMikhailidisDPMooreWSVeithFJ. Optimal contemporary management of symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Vascular. 2011;19(3):117–120.
