Of 1330 outpatients with suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT), a normal enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) d-dimer (VIDAS) of <500 ng/mL was true negative in 382 of 384 and false negative in compression ultrasonography (CUS) in 2, indicating a sensitivity of 99.52% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.48%, with a specificity of 36% irrespective of clinical score. In 1059 outpatients with no DVT, the CUS was positive for the alternative diagnoses (AD): Bakers cyst, muscle hematoma, or old DVT in 62 (5.8%); superficial vein thrombosis without DVT in 78 (7.4%), and leg edema or varices in 17%. A second CUS in 641 patients was positive in 26 (4.0%), indicating an NPV of 96% after a first negative CUS. The NPV of the combination of a negative first CUS and a ELISA d-dimer test <1000 ng/mL was 99.1% at a specificity of 66.9%. As this strategy is cost effective by reduction in the need to repeat CUS by 67%, we designed a novel algorithm for the safe exclusion and diagnosis of DVT and AD for subsequent evaluation in a large prospective study.
LensingAWAPrandoniPBrandjesD. Detection of deep vein thrombosis by real timeB-mode ultrosonography. N Eng J Med. 1989;320:342–345.
2.
CogoALensingAWPrandoniPGirolamiAten CateJW. Comparison of real time B-mode ultrasonography and Doppler ultrasound with contrast venography in the diagnosis of venous thrombosis in symptomatic outpatient. Thromb Haemost. 1993;70(3):404–407.
3.
CogoALensingAWAKoopmanMMW. Compression ultrasonography for diagnostic management of patients with clinicaly suspected deep vein thrombosis. Prospective cohort study. BMJ. 1998;316(7143):17–20.
4.
BirdwellNGRaskob GE WhitsettTL. The clinical validity of normal compression ultrasonography in outpatients suspected of having deep vein thrombosis. Ann Intern Med. 1998;128(1):1–7.
5.
KearonCJulianJAMathMNewmanTEGinsbergJS. Non-invasive diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis. Ann Intern Med. 1998;128(8):663–677.
6.
MichielsJJ. Rational diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (RADIA DVT) in symptomatic outpatients with suspected DVT. Semin Thromb Hemost. 1998;24(4):401–407.
7.
MichielsJJFreyburgerGVan Der GraafFJanssenMOortwijnWVan BeekEJR. Strategies for the safe and effective exclusion and diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis by the sequential use of clinical score, D-dimer testing and compression ultrasonography. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2000;26(6):657–667.
8.
MichielsJJGadisseurAVan Der PlankenM. Different accuracies of rapid enzyme-linked immunosorbent, turbidimetric and agglutination D-dimer assays for thrombosis exclusion. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2006;32(7):678–693.
9.
FreyburgerGTrillaudHLabroucheS. D-dimer strategy in thrombosis exclusion. A gold standard in 100 patients suspected of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism: 8 D-dimer methods compared. Thromb Haemost. 1998;79(1):32–37.
10.
JanssenMCHWollersheimHVerbruggenHNovakovaIRO. Rapid D-dimer assays to exclude deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Semin Thromb Hemost. 1998;24(4):393–400.
11.
WellsPAndersonDRBormanisJ. Value of assessment of pretest probability of deep vein thrombosis in clinical management. Lancet. 2007;350(9094):1795–1798.
12.
OudegaRHoesAWMoonsKGM. The Wells score does not rule out dep vein thrombosis in the primary care setting. Ann Int Med. 2005;143(2):100–107.
13.
OudegaRMoonsKGMHoesAW. Ruling out deep vein thrombosis in the primary care setting. Thromb Haemost. 2005;94:200–205.
14.
OudegaRTollDBBultenRJHoesAWMoonsKGM. Different cut-off values fort wo D-dimer assays to exclude deep vein thrombosis in primary care. Thromb Haemost. 2006;95(4):744–746.
15.
TollDBGeersingGJOudegaRWijlandRBlikmanMJCMoonsKGMHoesAW. The diagnostic accuracy & user-friendness of five point of care D-dimer assays forthe exclusion of deep vein thrombosis. In Diane Toll. Excluding deep vein thrombosis in primary care. Thesis 2008 University Medical Center Utrecht. Chapter8:87–98.
16.
De MoerloosePDesmarraisSBounameauxH. Contribution of a new rapid, individual and quantitative automated VIDAS D-dimer ELISA to exclude pulmonary embolism. Thromb Haemost. 1996;75(1):11–13.
17.
PerrierADesmarraisSMironMJ. Non-invasive diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in outpatients. Lancet. 1999;353(9148):190–195.
18.
MichelsJJPerrierABounameauxH. Should a normal D-dimer rule out angiographic pulmonary embolism or unfavorable outcome in patients left untreated?Thromb Haemost. 2001;85(4):753–754.
19.
MichielsJJSchroyensWDe BackerWVan Der PlankenMHoogstedenHPattynamaPMT. Non-invasive exclusion and diagnosis of pulmonary embolism by sequential use of the rapid ELISA D-dimer assay, clinical score and spiral CT. Int Angiol. 2003;22(1):1–14.
20.
MichielsJJGadisseurAVan Der PlankenM. Screening for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in outpatients with suspected deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism by the sequential use of clinical score, a sensitive D-dimer and non-invasive diagnostic tools. Sem Vasc Med. 2005;5(4):351–370.
