SianosGMorelMAKappeteinAP. The SYNTAX Score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease. Eurointervention. 2005;1
(2):219–227.
2.
SerruysPWMoriceMCKappeteinAP. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;360
(10):961–972.
3.
MohrFWMoriceMCKappeteinAP. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel disease and left main coronary disease: 5-year follow-up of the randomised, clinical SYNTAX trial. Lancet. 2013;381
(9867):629–638.
4.
CapodannoD. Beyond the SYNTAX score--advantages and limitations of other risk assessment systems in left main percutaneous coronary intervention. Circ J. 2013;77
(5):1131–1138.
5.
SerruysPWOnumaYGargS. Assessment of the SYNTAX score in the Syntax study. EuroIntervention. 2009;5
(1):50–56.
6.
MohrFWRastanAJSerruysPW. Complex coronary anatomy in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: impact of complex coronary anatomy in modern bypass surgery? Lessons learned from the SYNTAX trial after two years. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;141
(1):130–140.
7.
CapodannoDCaggegiAMianoM. Global risk classification and clinical SYNTAX (synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXUS and cardiac surgery) score in patients undergoing percutaneous or surgical left main revascularization. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4
(3):287–297.
8.
SerruysPWFarooqVVranckxPGirasisCBrugalettaSGarcia-GarciaHM. A global risk approach to identify patients with left main or 3-vessel disease who could safely and efficaciously be treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: the SYNTAX Trial at 3 years. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5
(6):606–617.
9.
GargSSarnoGGarcia-GarciaHM. A new tool for the risk stratification of patients with complex coronary artery disease: the Clinical SYNTAX Score. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3
(4):317–326.
10.
FarooqVVergouweYRaberL. Combined anatomical and clinical factors for the long-term risk stratification of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the Logistic Clinical SYNTAX score. Eur Heart J. 2012;33
(24):3098–3104.
11.
FarooqVvan KlaverenDSteyerbergEW. Anatomical and clinical characteristics to guide decision making between coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention for individual patients: development and validation of SYNTAX score II. Lancet. 2013;381
(9867):639–650.
12.
IqbalJVergouweYBourantasCVKlaverenDVZhangYJCamposCM. Predicting 3-year mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention: updated logistic clinical SYNTAX score based on patient-level data from 7 contemporary stent trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7
(5):464–470.
13.
OzturkDCelikOCakmakHA. Usefulness of the logistic clinical SYNTAX score in prediction saphenous vein graft failure in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Angiology. 2015;66
(8):714–720.
14.
KatsikiNAthyrosVGKaragiannisAWierzbickiASMikhailidisDP. Should we expand the concept of coronary heart disease equivalents?Curr Opin Cardiol. 2014;29
(4):389–395.
15.
HessCNLopesRDGibsonCM. Saphenous Vein Graft Failure After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Insights From PREVENT IV. Circulation. 2014;130(17):1445–1451.
