Endovascular repair for aortic aneurysm (EVAR) is rapidly increasing in popularity. The nature of this intervention requires significant exposure to ionizing radiation both during the procedure and for postoperative surveillance, generally in the form of computed tomography. Here the authors review the literature for radiation exposure during EVAR, both for the patient and the physician.
Edison Fears Hidden Perils of the X-Rays. New York World. Aug3, 1903:1.
2.
SinghSKalraMKThrallJHMaheshM. Pointers for optimizing radiation dose in pediatric CT protocols. J Am Coll Radiol. 2012;9
(1):77–79.
3.
EntrikinDWLeipsicJACarrJJ. Optimization of radiation dose reduction in cardiac computed tomographic angiography. Cardiol Rev. 2011;19
(4):163–176.
4.
MoonJHParkE-ALeeW. The diagnostic accuracy, image quality and radiation dose of 64-slice dual-source CT in daily practice: a single institution’s experience. Korean J Radiol. 2011;12
(3):308–318.
5.
BrennerDJ. Should we be concerned about the rapid increase in CT usage?Rev Environ Health. 2010;25
(1):63–68.
6.
BrennerDJ. Slowing the increase in the population dose resulting from CT scans. Radiat Res. 2010;174
(6):809–815.
7.
EisenbergRLBankierAABoisellePM. Compliance with Fleischner Society guidelines for management of small lung nodules: a survey of 834 radiologists. Radiology. 2010;255
(1):218–224.
8.
BrennerDJHallEJ. Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357
(22):2277–2284.
9.
ProkopM. New challenges in MDCT. Eur Radiol. 2005;15
(suppl 5):E35–E45.
10.
BrennerDJHricakH. Radiation exposure from medical imaging: time to regulate?JAMA. 2010;304
(2):208–209.
11.
Smith-BindmanR. Is computed tomography safe?N Engl J Med. 2010;363
(1):1–4.
BaerlocherMODetskyAS. Discussing radiation risks associated with CT scans with patients. JAMA. 2010;304
(19):2170–2171.
14.
LeeCIHaimsAHMonicoEPBrinkJAFormanHP. Diagnostic CT scans: assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks. Radiology. 2004;231
(2):393–398.
15.
HartshorneT. Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair and the role of ultrasound surveillance. Ultrasound. 2006;14
(1):34–42.
HowellsPEatonRPatelASTaylorPModaraiB. Risk of radiation exposure during endovascular aortic repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012;43
(4):393–397.
18.
MotaganahalliRMartinAFelicianoBMurphyMPSlavenJDalsingMC. Estimating the risk of solid organ malignancy in patients undergoing routine computed tomography scans after endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2012;56
(4):929–937.
19.
Smith-BindmanRLipsonJMarcusR. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169
(22):2078–2086.
BajoghliMBajoghliFTayariNRouzbahaniR. Children, CT scan and radiation. Int J Prev Med. 2010;1
(4):220–222.
22.
BannazadehMAltinelOKashyapVSSunZClairDSaracTP. Patterns of procedure-specific radiation exposure in the endovascular era: impetus for further innovation. J Vasc Surg. 2009;49
(6):1520–1524.
23.
HoPChengSWKWuPM. Ionizing radiation absorption of vascular surgeons during endovascular procedures. J Vasc Surg. 2007;46
(3):455–459.
24.
KocinajDCioppaAAmbrosiniG. Radiation dose exposure during cardiac and peripheral arteries catheterisation. Int J Cardiol. 2006;113
(2):283–284.
25.
YiinJHSchubauer-BeriganMKSilverSR. Risk of lung cancer and leukemia from exposure to ionizing radiation and potential confounders among workers at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard. Radiat Res. 2005;163
(6):603–613.
26.
PrestonDLShimizuYPierceDASuyamaAMabuchiK. Studies of mortality of atomic bomb survivors. Report 13: solid cancer and noncancer disease mortality: 1950-1997. Radiat Res. 2003;160
(4):381–407.
27.
ShopeT. Radiation-induced skin injuries from fluoroscopy. Radiology. 1995;197(5):449.
28.
WagnerLKEifelPJGeiseRA. Potential biological effects following high X-ray dose interventional procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1994;5
(1):71–84.
29.
FossacecaRBrambillaMGuzzardiG. The impact of radiological equipment on patient radiation exposure during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Eur Radiol. 2012;22
(11):2424–2431.
30.
Manstad-HulaasFTangenGADahlTHernesTANAadahlP. Three-dimensional electromagnetic navigation vs. fluoroscopy for endovascular aneurysm repair: a prospective feasibility study in patients. J Endovasc Ther. 2012;19
(1):70–78.
31.
MaurelBSobocinskiJPeriniP. Evaluation of radiation during EVAR performed on a mobile C-arm. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012;43
(1):16–21.
LaksSMacariMChandaranaH. Dual-energy computed tomography imaging of the aorta after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2010;31
(4):292–300.
AldrichJEBilawichA-MMayoJR. Radiation doses to patients receiving computed tomography examinations in British Columbia. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2006;57
(2):79–85.
36.
AlricPHinchliffeRJWenhamPWWhitakerSCChuterTAMHopkinsonBR. Lessons learned from the long-term follow-up of a first-generation aortic stent graft. J Vasc Surg. 2003;37
(2):367–373.
37.
BrennerDJDollRGoodheadDT. Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100
(24):13761–13766.
38.
MajewskaNBlaszakMAJuszkatRFrankiewiczMMakalowskiMMajewskiW. Patients’ radiation doses during the implantation of stents in carotid, renal, iliac, femoral and popliteal arteries. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;41
(3):372–377.
39.
GreenhalghRBrownLKwongGPowellJThompsonS, EVAR trial participants. Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;364
(9437):843–848.
40.
ThakorASWinterbottomAMercuriMCousinsCGauntME. The radiation burden from increasingly complex endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Insights Imaging. 2011;2
(6):699–704.
GeijerHLarzonTPopekRBeckmanK-W. Radiation exposure in stent-grafting of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Br J Radiol. 2005;78
(934):906–912.
43.
JonesCBadgerSABoydCSSoongCV. The impact of radiation dose exposure during endovascular aneurysm repair on patient safety. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52
(2):298–302.
44.
BadgerSAJonesCBoydCSSoongCV. Determinants of radiation exposure during EVAR. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;40
(3):320–325.
45.
BadgerSAO’donnellMEMakarRRLoanWLeeBSoongCV. Aortic necks of ruptured abdominal aneurysms dilate more than asymptomatic aneurysms after endovascular repair. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44
(2):244–249.
WalshCO’CallaghanAMooreD. Measurement and optimization of patient radiation doses in endovascular aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012;43
(5):534–539.
48.
WhiteHAMacdonaldS. Estimating risk associated with radiation exposure during follow-up after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2010;51
(1):95–104.
49.
AmisESButlerPFApplegateKE. American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine. J Am Coll Radiol. 2007;4
(5):272–284.
50.
SchinderaSTDiedrichsenLMüllerHC. Iterative reconstruction algorithm for abdominal multidetector CT at different tube voltages: assessment of diagnostic accuracy, image quality, and radiation dose in a phantom study. Radiology. 2011;260
(2):454–462.
51.
SchinderaSTTockIMarinD. Effect of beam hardening on arterial enhancement in thoracoabdominal CT angiography with increasing patient size: an in vitro and in vivo study. Radiology. 2010;256
(2):528–535.
52.
Szucs-FarkasZKaelinIFlachPM. Detection of chest trauma with whole-body low-dose linear slit digital radiography: a multireader study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194
(5):W388–W395.
53.
SchinderaSTNelsonRCYoshizumiT. Effect of automatic tube current modulation on radiation dose and image quality for low tube voltage multidetector row CT angiography: phantom study. Acad Radiol. 2009;16
(8):997–1002.
54.
SchinderaSTGracaPPatakMA. Thoracoabdominal-aortoiliac multidetector-row CT angiography at 80 and 100 kVp: assessment of image quality and radiation dose. Invest Radiol. 2009;44
(10):650–655.
55.
Szucs-FarkasZSemadeniMBenslerS. Endoleak detection with CT angiography in an abdominal aortic aneurysm phantom: effect of tube energy, simulated patient size, and physical properties of endoleaks. Radiology. 2009;251
(2):590–598.
56.
WaaijerAProkopMVelthuisBKBakkerCJGde KortGAPvan LeeuwenMS. Circle of Willis at CT angiography: dose reduction and image quality—reducing tube voltage and increasing tube current settings. Radiology. 2007;242
(3):832–839.
57.
KalvaSPSahaniDVHahnPFSainiS. Using the K-edge to improve contrast conspicuity and to lower radiation dose with a 16-MDCT: a phantom and human study. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2006;30
(3):391–397.
58.
BischoffBHeinFMeyerT. Impact of a reduced tube voltage on CT angiography and radiation dose: results of the PROTECTION I study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2
(8):940–946.
59.
HausleiterJMartinoffSHadamitzkyM. Image quality and radiation exposure with a low tube voltage protocol for coronary CT angiography results of the PROTECTION II trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3
(11):1113–1123.
60.
HalliburtonS. Options for reducing patient radiation dose with cardiovascular computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;25:253–264.
61.
AbadaHTLarchezCDaoudBSigal-CinqualbreAPaulJ-F. MDCT of the coronary arteries: feasibility of low-dose CT with ECG-pulsed tube current modulation to reduce radiation dose. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186
(6 suppl 2):S387–S390.
62.
ZhouW. Radiation exposure of vascular surgery patients beyond endovascular procedures. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53(1 suppl):39S–43S.
63.
StanleyBMSemmensJBLawrence-BrownMMGoodmanMAHartleyDE. Fenestration in endovascular grafts for aortic aneurysm repair: new horizons for preserving blood flow in branch vessels. J Endovasc Ther. 2001;8
(1):16–24.
64.
Berrington de GonzálezADarbyS. Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries. Lancet. 2004;363
(9406):345–351.
65.
Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. Healthcare Spending and the Medicare Program: A Data Book. Washington, DC: Medicare Payment Advisory Commission; 2009.
66.
Board of Radiation Effects Research, Division on Earth and Life Sciences. Health Risks From Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase2. Washington DC: Board of Radiation Effects Research, Division on Earth and Life Sciences; 2006.
67.
Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. Impact of physician self-referral on use of imaging services within an episode. In: Report to the Congress—Improving Incentives in the Medicare Program. Washington, DC: MedPAC; 2009.
68.
BakerLCAtlasSWAfendulisCC. Expanded use of imaging technology and the challenge of measuring value. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008;27
(6):1467–1478.
69.
Massachusetts Medical Society. Investigation of Defensive Medicine in Massachusetts. Informational report 1-08. Waltham, MA: Massachusetts Medical Society; 2008.
70.
US Food and Drug Administration. White Paper: Initiative to Reduce Unnecessary Radiation Exposure from Medical Imaging. Silver Spring, MD: US Food and Drug Administration; 2010.
71.
HillmanBJGoldsmithJC. The uncritical use of high-tech medical imaging. N Engl J Med. 2010;363
(1):4–6.
72.
Government Accountability Office. Medicare Part B Imaging Services: Rapid Spending Growth and Shift to Physician Offices Indicate Need for CMS to Consider Additional Management Practices(GAO-08-452). Washington DC: Government Accountability Office; 2008.
73.
Government Accountability Office. Medicare: Trends in Fees, Utilization, and Expenditures for Imaging Services Before and After Implementation of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005(GAO-08-1102R). Washington DC: Government Accountability Office; 2008.
74.
International Commission on Radiation Protection. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiation Protection. ICRP Publication 60. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press; 1991.
75.
LipsitzECVeithFJOhkiT. Does the endovascular repair of aortoiliac aneurysms pose a radiation safety hazard to vascular surgeons?J Vasc Surg. 2000;32
(4):704–710.
76.
StoeckelhuberBMSchulzEMelchertUH. Procedures, spectrum and radiation exposure in CT-fluoroscopy [in German]. Rontgenpraxis. 2003;55
(2):51–57.
77.
AscherEMarksNASchutzerRWHingoraniAP. Duplex-guided balloon angioplasty and stenting for femoropopliteal arterial occlusive disease: an alternative in patients with renal insufficiency. J Vasc Surg. 2005;42
(6):1108–1113.
78.
RamanVKKarmarkarPVGuttmanMA. Real-time magnetic resonance-guided endovascular repair of experimental abdominal aortic aneurysm in swine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45
(12):2069–2077.
79.
HeWMarzolfSATipnisSHudaW. Scan region and organ doses in computed tomography. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012;148
(4):444–451.
KoenigTRWolffDMettlerFAWagnerLK. Skin injuries from fluoroscopically guided procedures: part 1, characteristics of radiation injury. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177(1):3–11.
