We evaluated the frequency and outcomes of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in Qatar. Data were collected retrospectively between 2004 and 2008 for all adult patients who underwent abdominal computed tomographic scanning for any reason. Patients with AAA were followed up for 3 years for aneurysmal rupture and mortality. Of the 13 115 patients screened, 61 (0.5%) patients had abdominal aneurysms. Most (82%) patients with AAA were male with mean age of 67 ± 12 years. The incidence of AAA substantially increased with age. Cardiovascular risk factors were prevalent among patients with AAA. The main location of AAA was infrarenal (67%), followed by thoracoabdominal (23%). The mean AAA diameter was 5.3 ± 2.5 cm. The rate of AAA rupture was 8% with a mortality rate of 60%; 80% of these were infrarenal, and 80% of them had a diameter of ≥5.5 cm. Overall mortality was 33%. This large study addressed the impact of screening for AAA in a population with high cardiovascular burden.
MessersmithWABrownDFBarryMJ. The prevalence and implications of incidental findings on ED abdominal CT scans. Am J Emerg Med. 2001;19(6):479–481.
2.
MunkMDPeitzmanABHostlerDPWolfsonAB. Frequency and follow-up of incidental findings on trauma computed tomography scans: experience at a level one trauma center. J Emerg Med. 2010;38(3):346–350.
3.
WestbrookJIBraithwaiteJMcIntoshJH. The outcomes for patients with incidental lesions: serendipitous or iatrogenic?Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171(5):1193–1196.
4.
BradyARThompsonSGFowkesFGGreenhalghRMPowellJT;TheUKSmall Aneurysm Trial Participants. Abdominal aortic aneurysm expansion: risk factors and time intervals for surveillance. Circulation. 2004;110(1):16–21.
5.
MollFLPowellJTFraedrichG. Management of abdominal aortic aneurysms clinical practice guidelines of the European society for vascular surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;41(suppl 1):S1–S58
6.
SantilliSMLittooyFNCambriaRA. Expansion rates and outcomes for the 3.0-cm to the 3.9-cm infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35(4):666–671.
7.
van WalravenCWongJMorantK.The influence of incidental abdominal aortic aneurysm monitoring on patient outcomes. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54(5):1290–1297.e2.
8.
GordonJRSWahlsTCarlosRCPipinosIIRosenthalGECramP. Failure to recognize newly identified aortic dilations in a health care system with an advanced electronic medical record. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(1):21–27.
9.
van WalravenCWongJMorantKJenningsAJettyPForsterAJ. Incidence, follow-up, and outcomes of incidental abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52(2):282–289.
10.
El-MenyarAZubaidMShehabA. Prevalence and impact of cardiovascular risk factors among patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome in the middle East. Clin Cardiol. 2011;34(1):51–58
11.
El-MenyarAAminHRashdanI. Ankle-brachial index and extent of atherosclerosis in patients from the Middle East (the AGATHA-ME study): a cross-sectional multicenter study. Angiology. 2009;60(3):329–334.
12.
AshtonHABuxtonMJDayNE. The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;360(9345):1531–1539.
13.
NormanPEJamrozikKLawrence-BrownMM. Population based randomised controlled trial on impact of screening on mortality from abdominal aortic aneurysm. BMJ. 2004;329(7477):1259–1264.
14.
GolledgeJMullerJDaughertyANormanP. Abdominal aortic aneurysm: pathogenesis and implications for management. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006;26(12):2605–2613.
15.
VardulakiKAWalkerNMDayNEDuffySWAshtonHAScottRA. Quantifying the risks of hypertension, age, sex and smoking in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg. 2000;87(2):195–200.
16.
FlemingCWhitlockEPBeilTLLederleFA. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a best evidence systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(3):203–211.
17.
LederleFAJohnsonGRWilsonSE; Aneurysm Detection and Management Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study. Abdominal aortic aneurysm in women. J Vasc Surg. 2001;34(1):122–126.
18.
ScottRAWilsonNMAshtonHAKayDN. Influence of screening on the incidence of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: 5-year results of a randomized controlled study. Br J Surg. 1995;82(8):1066–1070.
19.
MoxonJVParrAEmetoTIWalkerPNormanPEGolledgeJ. Diagnosis and monitoring of abdominal aortic aneurysm: current status and future prospects. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2010;35(10):512–548.
20.
McFarlaneMJ. The epidemiologic necropsy for abdominal aortic aneurysm. JAMA. 1991;265(16):2085–2088.
21.
NormanPEPowellJT. Abdominal aortic aneurysm: the prognosis in women is worse than in men. Circulation. 2007;115(22):2865–2869.
22.
Chichester Aneurysm Screening Group; Viborg Aneurysm Screening Study; Western Australian Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Program; Mulicentre Aneurysm Screening Study. A comparative study of the prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms in the United Kingdom, Denmark, and Australia. J Med Screen. 2001;8(1):46–50.
23.
HarthunNL. Current issues in the treatment of women with abdominal aortic aneurysm. Gend Med. 2008;5(1):36–43.
24.
BrownLCPowellJT. Risk factors for aneurysm rupture in patients kept under ultrasound surveillance. UK Small Aneurysm Trial Participants. Ann Surg. 1999;230(3):289–296.
25.
BrownPMZeltDTSobolevB. The risk of rupture in untreated aneurysms: the impact of size, gender, and expansion rate. J Vasc Surg. 2003;37(2):280–284.
26.
SinghKBonaaKHJacobsenBKBjorkLSolbergS. Prevalence of and risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysms in a population-based study: the Tromsø Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;154(3):236–244.
27.
AggarwalSQamarASharmaVSharmaA.Abdominal aortic aneurysm: A comprehensive review. Exp Clin Cardiol. 2011;16(1):11–15.
28.
PowellJTGreenhalghRM. Clinical practice. Small abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(19):1895–1901.
29.
KentKCZwolakRMEgorovaNN. Analysis of risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysm in a cohort of more than 3 million individuals. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52(3):539–548.
30.
HirschATHaskalZJHertzerNR. ACC/AHA 2005 Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): a collaborative report from the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease): endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Society for Vascular Nursing; TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus; and Vascular Disease Foundation. Circulation2006;113(11):e463–e654.
31.
BrewsterDCCronenwettJLHallettJWJrJohnstonKWKrupskiWCMatsumuraJS; Joint Council of the American Association for Vascular Surgery and Society for Vascular Surgery. Guidelines for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Report of a subcommittee of the Joint Council of the American Association for Vascular Surgery and Society for Vascular Surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2003;37(5):1106–1117.
32.
LeeAJFowkesFGCarsonMNLengGCAllanPL. Smoking, atherosclerosis and risk of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur Heart J. 1997;18(4):671–676.
WilminkTBQuickCRHubbardCSDayNE. The influence of screening on the incidence of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 1999;30(2):203–208.
35.
PowellJTBrownLCForbesJF. Final 12-year follow-up of surgery versus surveillance in the UK Small Aneurysm Trial. Br J Surg. 2007;94(6):702–708.
36.
ThompsonARCooperJAAshtonHAHafezH.Growth rates of small abdominal aortic aneurysms correlate with clinical events. Br J Surg. 2010;97(1):37–44
37.
BradyARThompsonSGFowkesFGGreenhalghRMPowellJTUKSmall Aneurysm Trial Participants. Abdominal aortic aneurysm expansion: risk factors and time intervals for surveillance. Circulation. 2004;110(1):16–21.
38.
LederleFAJohnsonGRWilsonSE. The aneurysm detection and management study screening program: validation cohort and final results. Aneurysm Detection and Management Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Investigators. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(10):1425–1430.
39.
BobadillaJLKentKC.Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Adv Surg. 2012;46(1):101–109.
40.
LederleFAJohnsonGRWilsonSE. Prevalence and associations of abdominal aortic aneurysm detected through screening. Aneurysm Detection and Management (ADAM) Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group. Ann Int Med. 1997;126(6):441–449.
41.
The UK Small Aneurysm Trial Participants: Mortality results for randomized controlled trial of early elective surgery or ultrasonographic surveillance for small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Lancet. 1998;352(9141):1649–1655.
42.
EcksteinHHBöcklerDFlessenkämperISchmitz-RixenTDebusSLangW. Ultrasonographic screening for the detection of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2009;106(41):657–663.
43.
SimoniGPastorinoCPerroneR. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms and associated risk factors in a general population. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1995;10(2):207–210.
44.
IribarrenCDarbinianJAGoASFiremanBHLeeCDGreyDP. Traditional and novel risk factors for clinically diagnosed abdominal aortic aneurysm: the Kaiser multiphasic health checkup cohort study. Ann Epidemiol. 2007;17(9):669–678.
45.
ForsdahlSHSinghKSolbergSJacobsenBK. Risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysms: a 7-year prospective study: the Tromsø Study, 1994-2001. Circulation. 2009;119(16):2202–2208.
46.
BlanchardJFArmenianHKFriesenPP. Risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysm: results of a case-control study. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151(6):575–583.
47.
CornuzJPintoCSTevaearaiHEggerM.Risk factors for asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm. Systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based screening studies. Eur J Public Health. 2004;14(4):343–349.
48.
The UK Small Aneurysm Trial Participants. Long-term outcomes of immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(19):1445–1452.
49.
LindholtJSHeegaardNHVammenSFastingHHennebergEWHeickendorffL. Smoking, but not lipids, lipoprotein(a) and antibodies against oxidised LDL, is correlated to the expansion of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2001;21(1):51–56.
50.
LeMTJamrozikKDavisTMNormanPE. Negative association between infra-renal aortic diameter and glycaemia: the Health in Men Study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007;33(5):599–604.
51.
PleumeekersHJHoesAWvan der DoesE. Aneurysms of the abdominal aorta in older adults. The Rotterdam Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;142(12):1291–1299.
52.
GolledgeJKaranMMoranCS. Reduced expansion rate of abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients with diabetes may be related to aberrant monocyte–matrix interactions. Eur Heart J. 2008;29(5):665–672.
53.
Vega de CenigaMGomezREstalloLRodriguezLBaquerMBarbaA. Growth rate and associated factors in small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006;31(3):231–236.
54.
BenerAZirieMJanahiIMAl-HamaqAOMusallamMWarehamNJ. Prevalence of diagnosed and undiagnosed diabetes mellitus and its risk factors in a population-based study of Qatar. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2009;84(1):99–106.
55.
WildSRoglicGGreenASicreeRKingH. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(5):1047–1053.
56.
SvensjöSBjörckMGürtelschmidM. Low prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm among 65-year-old Swedish men indicates a change in the epidemiology of the disease. Circulation. 2011;124(10):1118–1123.
57.
CabellonSJrMoncriefCLPierreDR. Incidence of abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients with atheromatous arterial disease. Am J Surg. 1983;146(5):575–576.
58.
GolledgeJNormanPE. Atherosclerosis and abdominal aortic aneurysm: cause, response, or common risk factors?Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010;30(6):1075–1077.
59.
SchurinkGWvan BaalenJMVisserMJvan BockelJH. Thrombus within an aortic aneurysm does not reduce pressure on the aneurysmal wall. J Vasc Surg. 2000;31(3):501–506.
LederleFAJohnsonGRWilsonSE. Rupture rate of large abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients refusing or unfit for elective repair. JAMA. 2002;287(22):2968–2972.
62.
SiegelCLCohanRHKorobkinMAlpernMBCourneyaDLLederRA. Abdominal aortic aneurysm morphology: CT features in patients with ruptured and nonruptured aneurysms. Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163(5):1123–1129.
63.
NevittMPBallardDJHallettJWJr. Prognosis of abdominal aortic aneurysms. A population-based study. N Engl J Med. 1989;321(15):1009–1014.
64.
LederleFAWilsonSEJohnsonGR. Immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(19):1437–1444.
65.
JohanssonGNydahlSOlofssonPSwedenborgJ.Survival in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms. Comparison between operative and nonoperative management. Eur J Vasc Surg. 1990;4(5):497–502.
66.
LimetRSakalihassanNAlbertA. Determination of the expansion rate and incidence of rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 1991;14(4):540–548.
67.
HatakeyamaTShigematsuHMutoT. Risk factors for rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm based on three-dimensional study. J Vasc Surg. 2001;33(3):453–461.
68.
ChangJBSteinTALiuJPDunnME. Risk factors associated with rapid growth of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Surgery. 1997;121(2):117–122.
EarnshawJJ.Doubts and dilemmas over abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg. 2011;98(5):607–608
71.
TagakiHGotoSNMatsuiMManabeHUmemotoT. A further meta-analysis of population-based screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52(4):1103–1108.
72.
LawMRMorrisJWaldNJ. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Med Screen. 1994;1(2):110–115.
73.
WalkerTGKalvaSPYeddulaK. Clinical practice guidelines for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: written by the Standards of Practice Committee for the Society of Interventional Radiology and Endorsed by the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe and the Canadian Interventional Radiology Association. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21(11):1632–1655.
74.
FilardoGPowellJTMartinezMABallardDJ.Surgery for small asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;3:CD001835.
75.
AssarANZarinsCK. Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: a surgical emergency with many clinical presentations. Postgrad Med J. 2009;85(1003):268–273.
ArkoFRLeeWAHillBB. Aneurysm-related death: primary endpoint analysis for comparison of open and endovascular repair. J Vasc Surg. 2002;36(2):297–304.
78.
GreenhalghRMBrownLCKwongGPPowellJTThompsonSG;EVARtrial participants. Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;364(9437):843–848.
79.
PrinssenMVerhoevenELButhJ. A randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(16):1607–1618.
80.
TimaranCHVeithFJRoseroEB. Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in patients with the highest risk and in-hospital mortality in the United States. Arch Surg. 2007;142(6):520–524.
81.
BlankensteijnJDde JongSEPrinssenM. Two-year outcomes after conventional or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(23):2398–2405.
82.
EVAR trial participants. Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1): randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365(9478):2179–2186.
83.
ParaskevasKIWierzbickiASMikhailidisDP. Statins and noncardiac vascular disease. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2012;27(4):392–397.
