According to current international guidelines, patients with infrarenal or juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) measuring ≥ 5.5 cm should undergo repair to reduce the risk of rupture. The 5.5-cm-diameter threshold is the size when the AAA rupture rate balances the mortality rates of elective open surgical AAA repair (3%). Endovascular AAA repair (EVAR) is associated with lower perioperative mortality and complication rates compared with open surgical repair. This debate addresses the issue whether the current size threshold for elective AAA repair needs to be lowered in the endovascular era. This paper supports the position that the size threshold for AAA repair should be lowered in the endovascular era.
Bengtsson H. , Bergqvist D.Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: a population-based study. J Vasc Surg. 1993;18(1):74-80.
2.
Hirsch AT, Haskal ZJ, Hertzer NR, et al. American Association for Vascular Surgery; Society for Vascular Surgery; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions; Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology; Society of Interventional Radiology; ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease; American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Society for Vascular Nursing; TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus; Vascular Disease Foundation. ACC/AHA 2005 Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): a collaborative report from the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease): endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Society for Vascular Nursing; TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus; and Vascular Disease Foundation. Circulation. 2006;113(11):e463-e654.
3.
Lederle FA, Wilson SE, Johnson GR, et al. Aneurysm Detection and Management Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group. Immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(19):1437-1444.
4.
The UK Small Aneurysm Trial Participants.Mortality results for randomised controlled trial of early elective surgery or ultrasonographic surveillance for small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Lancet. 1998;352(9141):1649-1655.
5.
United Kingdom SmallAneurysm Trial Participants.Long-term outcomes of immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms . N Engl J Med. 2002; 346(19):1445-1552.
6.
Schermerhorn ML, O’Malley AJ, Jhaveri A., et al. Endovascular vs. open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in the Medicare population. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(5):464-474.
7.
Cao P.CAESAR Trial Collaborators.Comparison of surveillance vs Aortic Endografting for Small Aneurysm Repair (CAESAR) trial: study design and progress. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg . 2005;30(3):245-251.
8.
Ouriel K.Treating smaller AAAs.Does the availability of endovascular grafts change the size threshold for repair?Endovascular Today. 2005;3(4):39-42. http://www.evtoday.com/PDFarticles/0305/F1_Ouriel.html, accessed on April 2, 2010.
9.
Paraskevas KIThe size threshold for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair should be lowered in the endovascular era. J Endovasc Ther.2009;16(4):524-526.
10.
Lederle FA, Freischlag JA, Kyriakides TC, et al. Open Versus Endovascular Repair (OVER) Veterans Affairs Cooperative Group. Outcomes following endovascular vs open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a randomized trial. JAMA.2009; 302(14):1535-1542.
11.
Welborn MB, Yau FS, Modrall JG, et al. Endovascular repair of small abdominal aortic aneurysms: a paradigm shift? Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2005;39(5):381-391.
12.
Zarins CKEndovascular aneurysm repair at 5 years: does aneurysm diameter predict outcome ? J Vasc Surg. 2006;44(5): 920-930.
13.
Reed WW, Hallett JW Jr, Damiano MA, Ballard DJLearning from the last ultrasound. A population-based study of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm. Arch Intern Med. 1997; 157(18):2064-2068.
14.
Scott RA, Tisi PV, Ashton HA, Allen DRAbdominal aortic aneurysm rupture rates: a 7-year follow-up of the entire abdominal aortic aneurysm population detected by screening. J Vasc Surg. 1998;28(1):124-128.
15.
Brown LC, Power JTRisk factors for aneurysm rupture in patients kept under ultrasound surveillance . UK Small Aneurysm Trial Participants. Ann Surg. 1999;230(3):289-296.
16.
Prinssen M. , Buskens E., de Jong SE, et al. DREAM trial participants. Cost-effectiveness of conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: results of a randomized trial. J Vasc Surg. 2007;46(5):883-890.
17.
Jonk YC, Kane RL, Lederle FA, MacDonald R., Cutting AH, Wilt TJCost-effectiveness of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a systematic review . Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007; 23(2):205-215.
