Commentary on ‘‘Microbial Spectrum and Primary Resistance to Rifampicin in Infectious Complications in Vascular Surgery: Limits to the Use of Rifampicin-Bonded Prosthetic Grafts’’
Restricted accessEditorialFirst published online July, 2010
Commentary on ‘‘Microbial Spectrum and Primary Resistance to Rifampicin in Infectious Complications in Vascular Surgery: Limits to the Use of Rifampicin-Bonded Prosthetic Grafts’’
Topel I., Audebert F., Betz T., Steinbauer MGMicrobial spectrum and primary resistance to rifampicin in infectious complications in vascular surgery: limits to the use of rifampicin bonded prosthetic grafts . Angiology. In press.
2.
Torsello G., Sandmann W., Gehrt A., Jungblut RMIn-situ replacement of infected vascular prostheses with rifampicin soaked vascular grafts: early results. J Vasc Surg. 1993;17(4): 768-773.
3.
Hayes P., Nasim A., Sayers RD, et al. In-situ replacement of infected aortic grafts with rifampicin bonded prostheses: the Leicester experience (1992-1998). J Vasc Surg. 1999;30(1): 92-98.
4.
Young RM, Cherry KJ, Davis PM, et al. The results of in-situ prosthetic replacement for infected aortic grafts. Am J Surg. 1999;178(2):136-140.
5.
Bandyk DF, Novotney ML, Back MR, Johnson BL, Schmacht DCExpanded application of in-situ replacement for prosthetic graft infection . J Vasc Surg. 2001;34(3):411-420.
6.
Naylor ARCommentary on: Koshiko S, Sasajima T, Muraki S, Azuma N, Yamazaki K, Chiba K et al. Limitations in the use of rifampicin-gelatin graft against virulent organisms. J Vasc Surg. 2002:35(4):823-824.
7.
Koshiko S., Sasajima T., Muraki S., et al. Limitations in the use of rifampicin-gelatin graft against virulent organisms. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35(4):779-785.