Ensnarement of inferior vena cava filters with central line guide wires is an infrequent complication that has been sporadically reported. The authors present 4 patients who experienced this complication. They review the literature, make recommendations to avoid this preventable complication, and recommend what to do once the complication occurs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson FA, Wheeler HB, Goldberg RJ, et al: A population-based perspective of the hospital incidence and case-fatality rates of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. The Worchester OUT study. Arch Intern Med151:933-938, 1991.
2.
Aswad MA, Sandanger GP, Pais SO, et al: Early duplex scan evaluation of four inferior vena caval interruption devices. J Vasc Surg24:809-818, 1996.
3.
Ferris EF, McCowan TC, Carver DK, et al: Percutaneous inferior vena cava filters: Follow-up of seven designs in 320 patients. Radiology188:851-856, 1993.
4.
LaPlante JS, Contractor FM, Kiproff PM, et al: Migration of the Simon nitnol vena cava filter to the chest. Am J Roentgenol160:385-386, 1993.
5.
Gelbfish GA, Ascer E: Intracardiac and intrapulmonary Greenfield filters: A long-term follow-up. J Vasc Surg14:614-617, 1991.
6.
Kupferschmid JP, Dickson CS, Townsend RN, et al: Small bowel obstruction from an extruded Greenfield filter strut: An unusual late complication. J Vasc Surg16:113-115, 1992.
7.
Granke K, Abraham FM, McDowell DE: Vena cava filter disruption and central migration due to accidental guidewire manipulation: A case report. Ann Vasc Surg10:49-53, 1996.
8.
Dardik A, Campbell KA, Yeo CJ, et al: Vena cava filter ensnarement and delayed migration: An unusual series of cases. J Vasc Surg26:869-874, 1997.
9.
Ellis PK, Deutsch LS, Kidney DD: Interventional radiological retrieval of a guide wire entrapped in a Greenfield filter—treatment of an avoidable complication of central venous access procedure. Clin Radiol55:238-239, 2000.
10.
Marelich GP, Tharratt RS: Greenfield inferior vena cava filter dislodged during central venous catheter placement. Chest106:957-959, 1994.
11.
Loesberg A, Taylor FC, Awh MH: Dislodgement of inferior vena caval filters during blind insertion of central venous catheters. Am J Roentgenol161:637-638, 1993.
12.
Rosenblum JD, Boyle CM: Percutaneous retrieval of a vena-tech filter displaced during central line placement. Am J Roentgenol166:994-995, 1996.
13.
Uppot RN, Garcia M, Gheyi V, et al: Entanglement of guide wires by vena cava filters during central venous catheter insertion: Report of three cases and a review of the literature. Del Med J72:69-73, 2000.
14.
Amesbury S, Vargish T, Hall J: An unusual complication of central venous catheterization. Chest105:905-906, 1994.
15.
Kaufman JA, Thomas JW, Geller SC, et al: Guide wire entrapment by inferior vena caval filters: In vitro evaluation. Radiology198:7176, 1996.
16.
Morgan J, Sussman SK: “Monorail technique” for removal of entrapped exchange wire in a greenfield filter. J Intervent Radiol9:469-470, 1998.
17.
Giaturco C, Anderson JH, Wallace S: A new vena cava filter: Experimental animal evaluation. Radiology137:835-837, 1980.
18.
Teitelvaum GP, McGurrin M, Davies BL, et al: Insertion and recovery of a new retrievable vena caval filter: Work in progress. Radiology23:527-533, 1988.
