Abstract
Background
Driving pressure (ΔP), the difference between peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) or plateau pressure (Pplat) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), has been proposed as a better target for avoiding ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) in mechanically ventilated patients. This study aimed to determine if lower dynamic ΔP would correlate with reduced mortality and lower incidences of VILI.
Methods
A single-center retrospective analysis identified 237 trauma patients admitted in 2020 who underwent ≥48 hours of mechanical ventilation and survived ≥72 hours. The primary outcomes were 30-day hospital mortality and development of acute hypoxic VILI. Univariate and multivariate analyses assessed variables associated with 30-day mortality and VILI incidence.
Results
The cohort had a median age of 45 years, predominantly male (83.1%), with most admitted for blunt trauma (62.4%). The median ventilation duration was 6 days. Mortality was 20% for patients with ΔP ≤ 15 cm H2O and 32% for those with higher ΔP (P = 0.04). Ventilator-induced lung injury incidence was higher in patients with ΔP ≥ 15 cm H2O (34% vs 19%; P = 0.01). Multivariate analysis, adjusting for age, Injury Severity Score (ISS), and presence of intracranial bleed, indicated that an average ΔP ≥ 15 cm H2O was associated with an increased risk of 30-day mortality (OR 2.4; 95% CI 1.2-4.8, P = 0.02) and higher VILI incidence (OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.2-4.0, P = 0.01).
Conclusions
Among trauma patients requiring at least 48 hours of mechanical ventilation, employing strategies to limit dynamic ΔP to less than 15 cm H2O may reduce 30-day mortality and the incidence of acute VILI.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
