A rise in knot-related complications in the 1970s due to the growing number of synthetic sutures available to surgeons led to the experimental study of the security of tied surgical knots. Great progress in the understanding of the effect of knot configuration on knot security has been made since that time, but the findings have had uneven penetration both among and within the various surgical specialties. The emergence of multiple different knot-tying lexicons as well as inconsistencies between the verbal descriptions and illustrations of some of these lexicons presents a challenge to surgeons interested in learning about the subject. This has contributed to the lack of dissemination of knowledge on sliding knots, which in turn almost certainly contributes to the many complications reported in the literature related to knot slippage that can be as devastating as patient mortality. Disentangling the divergent nomenclatures and understanding the reasons for their emergence allow for the critical appraisal of the existing landscape of knot-tying literature.
CalhounTRKittenCM. Polypropylene suture—Is it safe?J Vasc Surg. 1986;4:98-100. doi:10.1016/0741-5214(86)90328-9
4.
ChuCC. Materials for absorbable and nonabsorbable surgical sutures. Biotextiles As Medical Implants. 2013;11:275-334. doi:10.1533/9780857095602.2.275
5.
MufflyTMTizzanoAPWaltersMD. The history and evolution of sutures in pelvic surgery. J R Soc Med. 2011;104:107-112. doi:10.1258/jrsm.2010.100243
6.
PostlethwaitR. Tissue Reaction to Surgical Sutures. Repair and Regeneration. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1969:263-285.
7.
AlverydAJacobssonS. Dexon for sutures and ligatures. Acta Chir Scand. 1975;141:256-258.
8.
ClarkCGHarrisTElmasriSWyllieJHDowJ. Polyglycolic-ACID sutures and catgut in colonic anastomoses: a controlled clinical trial. Lancet. 1972;300:1006-1007. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(72)92411-7
9.
HansenB. Medical History’s Moment in Art Photography (1920 to 1950): how Lejaren à Hiller and Valentino Sarra Created a Fashion for Scenes of Early Surgery. J Hist Med Allied Sci. 2017;72:381-421. doi:10.1093/jhmas/jrx037
10.
TurnerD. Lejaren à Hiller and the Cinema. Film History. Int J. 2007;19:302-318. doi:10.1353/fih.2007.0033
11.
HolmlundDE. Knot properties of surgical suture materials. A model study. Acta Chir Scand. 1974;140:355-362.
12.
TaylorFW. Surgical knots. Ann Surg. 1938;107:458-468. doi:10.1097/00000658-193803000-00011
13.
DinsmoreRC. Understanding surgical knot security: a proposal to standardize the literature. J Am Coll Surg. 1995;180:689-699.
14.
HerrmannJB. Tensile strength and knot security of surgical suture materials. Am Surg. 1971;37:209-217.
15.
TeraHAbergC. Relaparotomy. A ten-year series. Acta Chir Scand. 1975;141:637-644.
16.
TeraHAbergC. Tensile strengths of twelve types of knot employed in surgery, using different suture materials. Acta Chir Scand. 1976;142:1-7.
17.
LueckeL. SCAN 335, Monograph, Kim West. Columbia: University of British Columbia; 2019.
18.
LjungqvistFCSeimA. The spatiotemporal distribution of late viking age Swedish runestones: a reflection of the christianisation process and its speed. J Archaeol Sci: Reports. 2018;21:849-861. doi:10.1016/j.jasrep.2018.08.044
19.
HaxtonH. Surgical Techniques. Bristol: John Wright Bristol; 1970.
20.
TrimbosJB. Security of various knots commonly used in surgical practice. Obstet Gynecol. 1984;64:274-280.
21.
LoutzenheiserTDHarrymanDTZieglerDWYungSW. Optimizing arthroscopic knots using braided or monofilament suture. Arthroscopy. 1998;14:57-65. doi:10.1016/s0749-8063(98)70121-5
22.
RomeoARochaCLFernandesLF, et al.What is the best surgeon’s knot? Evaluation of the security of the different laparoscopic knot combinations. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25:902-911. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2018.01.032
23.
RomeoAFernandesLFCervantesGV, et al.Which knots are recommended in laparoscopic surgery and how to avoid insecure knots. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020;27:1395-1404. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2019.09.782
24.
TrimbosJB. Security of various knots commonly used in surgical practice. Obstet Gynecol. 1984;64:274-280.
25.
DinsmoreRC. Understanding surgical knot security: a proposal to standardize the literature. J Am Coll Surg. 1995;180:689-699.
RomeoARochaCLFernandesLF, et al.What is the best surgeon’s knot? Evaluation of the security of the different laparoscopic knot combinations. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25:902-911. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2018.01.032
O’KeefeTJLakeCPerkinsLA, et al.“the gordian knot of it He will unloose”: lessons learned from studies of half-hitch surgical knots and implications for practicing surgeons: a systematic review. Surgery. Online ahead of print. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2024.10.023
30.
IlahiOAYounasSAAlexanderJNoblePC. Cyclic testing of arthroscopic knot security. Arthroscopy. 2004;20:62-68. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2003.11.002
31.
ElkousyHHammermanSMEdwardsTB, et al.The arthroscopic square knot: a biomechanical comparison with open and arthroscopic knots. Arthroscopy. 2006;22:736-741. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2006.04.075
32.
GundersonPE. The half-hitch knot: a rational alternative to the square knot. Am J Surg. 1987;154:538-540. doi:10.1016/0002-9610(87)90273-X
33.
WuVSykesEAMercerDHopmanWMTangE. Comparing the tensile strength of square and reversing half-hitch alternating post knots. Can J Surg. 2017;60:179-185. doi:10.1503/cjs.009716
34.
IlahiOAYounasSAHoDMNoblePC. Security of knots tied with ethibond, fiberwire, orthocord, or ultrabraid. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:2407-2414. doi:10.1177/0363546508323745
35.
WuVYeungCSykesEAZevinB. Comparison of knot-tying proficiency and knot characteristics for square and reversing half hitch alternating-post surgical knots in a simulated deep body cavity among notice medical students. Can J Surg. 2018;61:385-391. doi:10.1503/cjs.014217
36.
SchubertDCUngerJBMukherjeeDPerroneJF. Mechanical performance of knots using braided and monofilament absorbable sutures. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:1438-1440. doi:10.1067/mob.2002.129156
37.
CortezRLazcanoEMillerT, et al.Barbed sutures and wound complications in plastic surgery: an analysis of outcomes. Aesthet Surg J. 2015;35:178-188. doi:10.1093/asj/sju012
38.
WangLMaejimaTFukahoriSNishiharaSYoshikawaDKonoT. Bowel obstruction and perforation secondary to barbed suture after minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair: report of two cases and literature review. Surg Case Rep. 2021;7:161. doi:10.1186/s40792-021-01249-w
39.
HoodMRoweTMValenzeulaMMMcBrideBOdumSFehringTK. Arthrotomy dehiscence after total knee arthroplasty with a barbed suture. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2023;31:300-304.
