Outcomes of Preperitoneal Packing and Angioembolization for Hemorrhage Control in Hemodynamically Unstable Pelvic Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Background

Hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures are often life-threatening injuries; however, the optimal management remains uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the most appropriate primary management of hemorrhage in adult patients with hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures by comparing outcomes following the initial use of preperitoneal packing (PPP) vs angioembolization (AE).

Methods

A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and ProQuest databases was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Studies assessing hemorrhage management in trauma patients with hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures were included. The data extracted from selected articles included patient demographics, study design, and outcomes such as 24-hour PRBC transfusions, in-hospital mortality, and DVT rate.

Results

Eight articles were included in the systematic review. Among the included studies, 2040 patients with hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures were analyzed. Meta-analyses revealed that treatment with PPP was associated with fewer 24-hour PRBC transfusions (mean difference = −1.0, 95% CI: −1.8 to −.2) than AE. However, no significant differences were noted in in-hospital mortality (RR: .91, 95% CI: .80-1.05) and the rate of deep vein thrombosis (RR: .89, 95% CI: .62-1.28) between groups.

Conclusion

The findings of this study suggest that primary management with PPP was associated with fewer 24-hour PRBC transfusions compared to AE. The choice of primary management with PPP or AE did not significantly impact in-hospital mortality. Future studies should address clinical outcomes and the factors that affect them to better understand the impact of different management strategies and direct the creation of practice management guidelines.

Keywords

pelvic fracture preperitoneal packing angioembolization hemorrhage trauma

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Yoshihara

Yoneoka

. Demographic epidemiology of unstable pelvic fracture in the United States from 2000 to 2009: trends and in-hospital mortality. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76(2):380-385. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e3182ab0cde

Heetveld

Harris

Schlaphoff

Sugrue

. Guidelines for the management of haemodynamically unstable pelvic fracture patients. ANZ J Surg. 2004;74(7):520-529. doi:10.1111/j.1445-2197.2004.03074.x

Dalal

Burgess

Siegel

, et al. Pelvic fracture in multiple trauma: classification by mechanism is key to pattern of organ injury, resuscitative requirements, and outcome. J Trauma. 1989;29(7):981-1000. discussion 1000-1002. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2746708

Grotz

MRW

Allami

Harwood

Pape

Krettek

Giannoudis

. Open pelvic fractures: epidemiology, current concepts of management and outcome. Injury. 2005;36(1):1-13. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2004.05.029

Wijffels

Verbeek

Ponsen

Carel Goslings

van Delden

. Imaging and endovascular treatment of bleeding pelvic fractures: review article. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2019;42(1):10-18. doi:10.1007/s00270-018-2071-4

Croce

Magnotti

Savage

Wood

2nd Fabian

. Emergent pelvic fixation in patients with exsanguinating pelvic fractures. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204(5):935-939. ; discussion 940-942. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.01.059

Costantini

Coimbra

Holcomb

, et al. Current management of hemorrhage from severe pelvic fractures: results of an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma multi-institutional trial. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;80(5):717-723. discussion 723-725. doi:10.1097/TA.0000000000001034

Aoki

Matsushima

Matsumoto

. Angioembolization versus preperitoneal packing for severe pelvic fractures: a propensity matched analysis. Am J Surg. 2023;225(2):408-413. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.09.003

McDonogh

Lewis

Tarrant

Balogh

. Preperitoneal packing versus angioembolization for the initial management of hemodynamically unstable pelvic fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022;92(5):931-939. doi:10.1097/TA.0000000000003528

10.

Coccolini

Stahel

Montori

, et al. Pelvic trauma: WSES classification and guidelines. World J Emerg Surg. 2017;12:5. doi:10.1186/s13017-017-0117-6

11.

Marmor

El Naga

Barker

Matz

Stergiadou

Miclau

. Management of pelvic ring injury patients with hemodynamic instability. Front Surg. 2020;7:588845. doi:10.3389/fsurg.2020.588845

12.

Jang

Bae

Chang

Jung

Kim

Kang

. Current management and clinical outcomes for patients with haemorrhagic shock due to pelvic fracture in Korean regional trauma centres: a multi-institutional trial. Injury. 2022;53(2):488-495. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2021.12.015

13.

Dong

Yang

, et al. Retroperitoneal packing or angioembolization for haemorrhage control of pelvic fractures--Quasi-randomized clinical trial of 56 haemodynamically unstable patients with Injury Severity Score ≥33. Injury. 2016;47(2):395-401. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.008

14.

Tai

DKC

Lee

, et al. Retroperitoneal pelvic packing in the management of hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures: a level I trauma center experience. J Trauma. 2011;71(4):E79-E86. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e31820cede0

15.

Hsu

Yadev

Faraj

. Controlling hemorrhage in exsanguinating pelvic fractures: utility of extraperitoneal pelvic packing as a damage control procedure. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2016;6(3):148-152. doi:10.4103/2229-5151.190655

16.

Kim

Lee

Jang

Lee

. Comparison of mortality according to hemorrhage control methods performed for hemodynamically unstable patients with traumatic pelvic fractures: a multi-center study. Asian J Surg. 2022;46:444-450. doi:10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.05.085

17.

Anand

El-Qawaqzeh

Nelson

, et al. Association between hemorrhage control interventions and mortality in US trauma patients with hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures. JAMA Surg. 2022;158:63-71. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2022.5772

18.

Osborn

Smith

Moore

, et al. Direct retroperitoneal pelvic packing versus pelvic angiography: a comparison of two management protocols for haemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures. Injury. 2009;40(1):54-60. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2008.08.038

19.

Patterson

Wier

Gary

. Preperitoneal pelvic packing for hypotension has a greater risk of venous thromboembolism than angioembolization: management of refractory hypotension in closed pelvic ring injury. JBJS. 2022;104(20):1821-1829. https://journals.lww.com/jbjsjournal/Fulltext/2022/10190/Preperitoneal_Pelvic_Packing_for_Hypotension_Has_a.7.aspx?casa_token=pLDLjFruVpMAAAAA:r8RPjp_R4E7Ahq7OUG6DGJtU3_VVhCVTMmD4V-r7Pv5k8ZobzMqwPJmapdRhrjl2J--CEIZ7eucOU8ooHWPt

20.

Cullinane

Schiller

Zielinski

, et al. Eastern association for the surgery of trauma practice management guidelines for hemorrhage in pelvic fracture--update and systematic review. J Trauma. 2011;71(6):1850-1868. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e31823dca9a

21.

Tran

TLN

Brasel

Karmy-Jones

, et al. Western trauma association critical decisions in trauma: management of pelvic fracture with hemodynamic instability—2016 updates. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;81(6):1171. doi:10.1097/TA.0000000000001230

22.

Gong

Park

Kang

, et al. Preperitoneal pelvic packing versus angioembolization for patients with hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures with pelvic bleeding: a single-centered retrospective study. Healthcare (Basel). 2023;11(12). doi:10.3390/healthcare11121784

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.07 MB