Abstract
Background
Decompression of the intestine with a long tube or nasogastric tube is the first-choice treatment for adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO). Scheduling surgery while weighing the risks of surgery against conservative care is a crucial factor in clinical decision-making. Whenever feasible, unnecessary surgeries should be avoided, and it is essential to provide clinical markers for this. This study aimed to obtain evidence regarding the optimal timing of ASBO and when conservative treatment options are not successful.
Methods
The data of patients diagnosed with ASBO and receiving long tube insertion for more than 7 days were reviewed. We investigated transit ileal drainage volume and recurrence. The primary outcomes were the change in the drainage volume from the long tube over time and the percentage of patients who required surgery. We evaluated some cutoff values to determine the indication for surgery based on the insertion duration and volume of long tube drainage.
Results
Ninety-nine patients were enrolled in this study. Fifty-one patients showed improvement with conservative treatment, whereas 48 ultimately required surgery. When a daily drainage volume of ≥500 mL was considered an indication for surgery, 13-37 cases (25%-72%) would be judged unnecessary within 6 days of long tube insertion, while 5 cases (9.8%) would be judged unnecessary on day 7.
Discussion
Unnecessary surgical interventions for ASBO might be avoided by assessing the drainage volume on day 7 after inserting a long tube.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.